Identifying key topics and network structures: A case in Korean AI value chain

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Hyo Jung Jang, Hyoung Ryul Ma
{"title":"Identifying key topics and network structures: A case in Korean AI value chain","authors":"Hyo Jung Jang,&nbsp;Hyoung Ryul Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2026.100737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides results of key topics and actor relationships in the Korea AI value chain using news articles. We build a dataset of 5200 news articles (2021–2024). Using LDA topic modeling, we identify 14 key topics and track yearly changes in the number of news articles in four value chain domains: the Hardware, Data, Model, and Solution domains. The results show a surge in the Hardware domain, a majority of articles in the Solution domain, gradual growth in the Model domain, and a small, stagnant Data domain. We then conduct a network analysis of actors within each domain. The Data domain has a policy driven structure with a relatively high share of government actors. The Hardware, Model, and Solution domains exhibit market driven structures dominated by big-tech firms. University and research institutes play a peripheral role across domains. Connections between domains also change over time. In the early years of the period, the strongest connection is between Solution-Data. By 2024, the strongest connection is between Solution-Hardware. Taken together, these findings suggest that the Korean AI value chain is dominated by large firms that mainly practice closed open innovation. The ecosystem remains in a transformation stage and shows weak integration in and around the Data and Model domains and a limited role for academic actors. Based on this, we argue that Korean AI policy should promote market open innovation through SMEs and start-ups, social open innovation, and closer links across domains and between universities, research institutes, and industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"12 1","pages":"Article 100737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853126000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides results of key topics and actor relationships in the Korea AI value chain using news articles. We build a dataset of 5200 news articles (2021–2024). Using LDA topic modeling, we identify 14 key topics and track yearly changes in the number of news articles in four value chain domains: the Hardware, Data, Model, and Solution domains. The results show a surge in the Hardware domain, a majority of articles in the Solution domain, gradual growth in the Model domain, and a small, stagnant Data domain. We then conduct a network analysis of actors within each domain. The Data domain has a policy driven structure with a relatively high share of government actors. The Hardware, Model, and Solution domains exhibit market driven structures dominated by big-tech firms. University and research institutes play a peripheral role across domains. Connections between domains also change over time. In the early years of the period, the strongest connection is between Solution-Data. By 2024, the strongest connection is between Solution-Hardware. Taken together, these findings suggest that the Korean AI value chain is dominated by large firms that mainly practice closed open innovation. The ecosystem remains in a transformation stage and shows weak integration in and around the Data and Model domains and a limited role for academic actors. Based on this, we argue that Korean AI policy should promote market open innovation through SMEs and start-ups, social open innovation, and closer links across domains and between universities, research institutes, and industry.
识别关键主题和网络结构:以韩国人工智能价值链为例
本研究利用新闻文章提供了韩国人工智能价值链中的关键话题和行动者关系的结果。我们建立了一个5200篇新闻文章(2021-2024)的数据集。使用LDA主题建模,我们确定了14个关键主题,并跟踪了四个价值链领域(硬件、数据、模型和解决方案领域)中新闻文章数量的年度变化。结果显示,硬件领域的文章激增,解决方案领域的文章占大多数,模型领域的文章逐渐增长,而数据领域的文章很少,却停滞不前。然后,我们对每个域中的参与者进行网络分析。数据领域是一个政策驱动的结构,政府参与者的比例相对较高。硬件、模型和解决方案领域表现出由大型科技公司主导的市场驱动结构。大学和研究机构在跨领域发挥外围作用。域之间的连接也会随时间变化。在这一时期的最初几年,最强的联系是在解决方案-数据之间。到2024年,解决方案与硬件之间的联系最为紧密。综上所述,这些发现表明,韩国人工智能价值链由主要实行封闭式开放式创新的大公司主导。生态系统仍处于转型阶段,在数据和模型领域及其周围表现出较弱的整合,学术参与者的作用有限。基于此,我们认为韩国的人工智能政策应该通过中小企业和初创企业、社会开放式创新以及跨领域、大学、研究机构和产业之间更紧密的联系来促进市场开放式创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书