A Comparison of Oral Sedation-Related Events of Three Multi-Agent Regimens in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.7
Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2026-01-15
Mariam Alkheder, Jung-Wei Chen, Meena Adami, Samah Omar
{"title":"A Comparison of Oral Sedation-Related Events of Three Multi-Agent Regimens in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mariam Alkheder, Jung-Wei Chen, Meena Adami, Samah Omar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare the effectiveness and report on oral sedation-related events using three different multiagent regimens in pediatric patients up to 24 hours post-discharge. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty healthy 3- to 7-year-old patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups. Group 1 received midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine (MZ/M/H; n equals 20). Group 2 received meperidine and hydroxyzine (M/H; n equals 20). Group 3 received midazolam and hydroxyzine (MZ/H; n equals 20). Nitrous oxide inhalation was concurrently used in all groups. After completion of sedation, the treating dentist answered survey 1 regarding the preoperative period until discharge. Parents completed 2 phone interviews at 8 and 24 hours post-discharge (surveys 2 and 3). Data analysis included chi-square, 1-way analysis of variance, and post-hoc tests (P<0.05). <b>Results:</b> Over-all, the 3 regimes were effective (90%). Group 1 showed a significant increase in slurring/difficulty speaking post-operatively and up to discharge (P=0.04). Groups 1 and 3 exhibited significantly greater difficulty walking on their own at discharge (P=0.02). Groups 1 and 2 experienced significantly increased lethargy (P=0.02) within 8 hours post-discharge. Overall musculoskeletal effects were significantly less prior to discharge in Group 2 (P=0.02), while gastrointestinal upset was significantly more in Group 1 at 24 hours post-discharge (P=0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that oral sedation regimens containing different combinations of midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine are effective and relatively safe. Postoperative monitoring remains essential up to 24 hours. Longer postoperative monitoring may be required when a 3-medication regimen is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":101357,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"48 1","pages":"23-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and report on oral sedation-related events using three different multiagent regimens in pediatric patients up to 24 hours post-discharge. Methods: Sixty healthy 3- to 7-year-old patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups. Group 1 received midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine (MZ/M/H; n equals 20). Group 2 received meperidine and hydroxyzine (M/H; n equals 20). Group 3 received midazolam and hydroxyzine (MZ/H; n equals 20). Nitrous oxide inhalation was concurrently used in all groups. After completion of sedation, the treating dentist answered survey 1 regarding the preoperative period until discharge. Parents completed 2 phone interviews at 8 and 24 hours post-discharge (surveys 2 and 3). Data analysis included chi-square, 1-way analysis of variance, and post-hoc tests (P<0.05). Results: Over-all, the 3 regimes were effective (90%). Group 1 showed a significant increase in slurring/difficulty speaking post-operatively and up to discharge (P=0.04). Groups 1 and 3 exhibited significantly greater difficulty walking on their own at discharge (P=0.02). Groups 1 and 2 experienced significantly increased lethargy (P=0.02) within 8 hours post-discharge. Overall musculoskeletal effects were significantly less prior to discharge in Group 2 (P=0.02), while gastrointestinal upset was significantly more in Group 1 at 24 hours post-discharge (P=0.01). Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that oral sedation regimens containing different combinations of midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine are effective and relatively safe. Postoperative monitoring remains essential up to 24 hours. Longer postoperative monitoring may be required when a 3-medication regimen is used.

儿科患者口服镇静相关事件的三种多药方案的比较:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较三种不同的多药方案在儿科患者出院后24小时内口服镇静相关事件的有效性和报告。方法:60例3 ~ 7岁健康儿童,随机分为3组。组1给予咪达唑仑、哌替啶、羟嗪(MZ/M/H, n = 20)。2组给予哌替啶和羟嗪(M/H, n = 20)。3组给予咪达唑仑和羟嗪(MZ/H, n = 20)。两组同时吸入氧化亚氮。镇静结束后,治疗牙医回答关于术前至出院期间的调查1。家长分别在出院后8小时和24小时完成2次电话访谈(调查2和3)。数据分析包括卡方分析、单因素方差分析和事后检验(结果:总体而言,3种方案有效(90%)。组1术后及出院前口齿不清/说话困难明显增加(P=0.04)。1组和3组出院时自主行走困难显著增加(P=0.02)。1组和2组在出院后8小时内嗜睡明显增加(P=0.02)。在出院前,组2的整体肌肉骨骼效应明显减少(P=0.02),而在出院后24小时,组1的胃肠道不适明显增加(P=0.01)。结论:该随机临床试验表明,咪达唑仑、哌哌啶和羟嗪的不同组合口服镇静方案有效且相对安全。术后24小时内仍需监测。当使用三种药物治疗方案时,可能需要更长的术后监测时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书