Outcomes following varicocele treatment: a comparative study of microsurgical and angioembolization approaches.

IF 2.7
Asian journal of andrology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.4103/aja202590
Ammar Al Homsi, Omar Almidani, Fadi Youness, Rashed Rowaiee, Ali Alabdullah, Omar Aljasmi, Ayman Moussa, Kashif Siddiqi, Alaeddin Barham, Omer Raheem
{"title":"Outcomes following varicocele treatment: a comparative study of microsurgical and angioembolization approaches.","authors":"Ammar Al Homsi, Omar Almidani, Fadi Youness, Rashed Rowaiee, Ali Alabdullah, Omar Aljasmi, Ayman Moussa, Kashif Siddiqi, Alaeddin Barham, Omer Raheem","doi":"10.4103/aja202590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of microsurgical varicocelectomy (MV) versus percutaneous angioembolization (AE) in men with varicoceles causing infertility or scrotal pain. Endpoints included postoperative changes in semen parameters, complication rates, pain relief, need for additional interventions, and the influence of body mass index (BMI). We retrospectively reviewed 264 male patients treated for varicocele from July 2015 to July 2024 (MV: 214 patients, and AE: 50 patients). Only patients older than 18 years were included. Indications were infertility or chronic varicocele-related scrotal pain. Pre- and post-treatment semen analyses were compared in infertile men, and pain outcomes were assessed in those treated for pain. Complications and secondary interventions were recorded, and outcomes were stratified by BMI. MV significantly improved sperm concentration, motility, and total motile count within 3-6 months, while AE showed no significant change. Complications occurred only in the MV group (8.9%), including hydrocele, hematoma, and surgical site infection, while no complications were reported in the AE group. Persistent pain was observed in one-third of patients in both groups, and AE was associated with a higher rate of secondary intervention (14.0%) compared to MV (6.6%). BMI was not linked to complications or operative time but was associated with poorer baseline semen quality. Within 3-6 months post-treatment, varicocelectomy yielded greater improvement in semen quality, while AE offered a favorable safety profile but less reproductive benefit and a higher retreatment rate. Both approaches were safe across BMI categories, though longer-term studies are needed to clarify patient selection and delayed outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93889,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of andrology","volume":" ","pages":"556-560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13623315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of andrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of microsurgical varicocelectomy (MV) versus percutaneous angioembolization (AE) in men with varicoceles causing infertility or scrotal pain. Endpoints included postoperative changes in semen parameters, complication rates, pain relief, need for additional interventions, and the influence of body mass index (BMI). We retrospectively reviewed 264 male patients treated for varicocele from July 2015 to July 2024 (MV: 214 patients, and AE: 50 patients). Only patients older than 18 years were included. Indications were infertility or chronic varicocele-related scrotal pain. Pre- and post-treatment semen analyses were compared in infertile men, and pain outcomes were assessed in those treated for pain. Complications and secondary interventions were recorded, and outcomes were stratified by BMI. MV significantly improved sperm concentration, motility, and total motile count within 3-6 months, while AE showed no significant change. Complications occurred only in the MV group (8.9%), including hydrocele, hematoma, and surgical site infection, while no complications were reported in the AE group. Persistent pain was observed in one-third of patients in both groups, and AE was associated with a higher rate of secondary intervention (14.0%) compared to MV (6.6%). BMI was not linked to complications or operative time but was associated with poorer baseline semen quality. Within 3-6 months post-treatment, varicocelectomy yielded greater improvement in semen quality, while AE offered a favorable safety profile but less reproductive benefit and a higher retreatment rate. Both approaches were safe across BMI categories, though longer-term studies are needed to clarify patient selection and delayed outcomes.

精索静脉曲张治疗的结果:显微手术和血管栓塞方法的比较研究。
本研究的目的是比较显微外科精索静脉曲张切除术(MV)与经皮血管栓塞(AE)治疗精索静脉曲张导致不育或阴囊疼痛的男性的结果。终点包括术后精液参数的变化、并发症发生率、疼痛缓解、额外干预的需要以及体重指数(BMI)的影响。我们回顾性分析了2015年7月至2024年7月接受精索静脉曲张治疗的264例男性患者(MV 214例,AE 50例)。仅包括年龄大于18岁的患者。适应症为不孕症或慢性精索静脉曲张相关阴囊疼痛。对不育男性治疗前和治疗后的精液分析进行比较,并对治疗后的疼痛结果进行评估。记录并发症和二次干预措施,并根据BMI对结果进行分层。MV在3-6个月内显著提高了精子浓度、活动力和总活动力计数,而AE无显著变化。并发症仅发生在MV组(8.9%),包括鞘膜积液、血肿和手术部位感染,而AE组无并发症报告。两组中均有三分之一的患者出现持续疼痛,AE的二次干预率(14.0%)高于MV(6.6%)。BMI与并发症或手术时间无关,但与较差的基线精液质量有关。治疗后3-6个月内,精索静脉曲张切除术的精液质量改善较大,AE的安全性较好,但生殖效益较差,复复率较高。这两种方法在BMI类别中都是安全的,尽管需要更长期的研究来明确患者的选择和延迟的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书