Primary care education in Korean medical and nursing schools: current status, perceptions, and educational needs.

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2025.101
Songrim Kim, Yul Ha Min, Jun Yim, So Jung Yune, Kwi Hwa Park
{"title":"Primary care education in Korean medical and nursing schools: current status, perceptions, and educational needs.","authors":"Songrim Kim, Yul Ha Min, Jun Yim, So Jung Yune, Kwi Hwa Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2025.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the current status, perceptions, and educational needs of primary care education in medical and nursing schools to provide foundational data that can inform effective curriculum development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 40 medical and 64 nursing schools were eligible for this study. Data were collected through an online survey using Google Forms, developed by the research team, from November 2024 to January 2025. Frequency analysis and independent t-tests were performed to compare perceptions on primary care education between the two schools types. Borich Needs Assessment and Locus-for-Focus model were used to identify and prioritize educational needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 21 medical and 24 nursing schools were analyzed. All medical schools primarily offered education in primary care clinics (100%), whereas most nursing schools offered it in community healthcare institutions (87.5%). Visits and observations were the most common educational methods (>80%). Reports, presentations, and discussions were the most used assessment methods (>60%). Multidisciplinary team-based practicums were limited in both medical (9.5%) and nursing (25.0%) schools. Both groups rated the need to expand primary care education and multidisciplinary team approach highly (>4.4/5). \"Longitudinality\" and \"generalism\" were educational priority needs across both groups, whereas other elements showed variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the shared and distinct aspects of primary care education across schools. The findings highlight the importance of enhancing and tailoring primary care education to each school's specific context and needs, while fostering interprofessional collaboration to strengthen community-based healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"38 1","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12971148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the current status, perceptions, and educational needs of primary care education in medical and nursing schools to provide foundational data that can inform effective curriculum development.

Methods: In total, 40 medical and 64 nursing schools were eligible for this study. Data were collected through an online survey using Google Forms, developed by the research team, from November 2024 to January 2025. Frequency analysis and independent t-tests were performed to compare perceptions on primary care education between the two schools types. Borich Needs Assessment and Locus-for-Focus model were used to identify and prioritize educational needs.

Results: Responses from 21 medical and 24 nursing schools were analyzed. All medical schools primarily offered education in primary care clinics (100%), whereas most nursing schools offered it in community healthcare institutions (87.5%). Visits and observations were the most common educational methods (>80%). Reports, presentations, and discussions were the most used assessment methods (>60%). Multidisciplinary team-based practicums were limited in both medical (9.5%) and nursing (25.0%) schools. Both groups rated the need to expand primary care education and multidisciplinary team approach highly (>4.4/5). "Longitudinality" and "generalism" were educational priority needs across both groups, whereas other elements showed variations.

Conclusion: This study identified the shared and distinct aspects of primary care education across schools. The findings highlight the importance of enhancing and tailoring primary care education to each school's specific context and needs, while fostering interprofessional collaboration to strengthen community-based healthcare.

Abstract Image

韩国医学和护理学校的初级保健教育:现状、观念和教育需求。
目的:本研究调查了医学和护理学校初级保健教育的现状、观念和教育需求,为有效的课程开发提供基础数据。方法:共有40所医学院和64所护理学校入选本研究。从2024年11月到2025年1月,研究小组使用谷歌表格通过在线调查收集数据。采用频率分析和独立t检验比较两种学校类型对初级保健教育的认知。使用Borich需求评估和焦点定位模型来识别和优先考虑教育需求。结果:对21所医学院校和24所护理院校的反馈进行分析。所有医学院主要在初级保健诊所提供教育(100%),而大多数护理学校在社区保健机构提供教育(87.5%)。访问和观察是最常见的教育方法(bbb80 %)。报告、演讲和讨论是最常用的评估方法(bbb60 %)。多学科团队实习在医学院(9.5%)和护理学院(25.0%)均有限。两组均高度评价扩大初级保健教育和多学科团队方法的必要性(>4.4/5)。“纵向”和“通才”是两组的教育优先需求,而其他因素则表现出差异。结论:本研究确定了各学校初级保健教育的共同和不同方面。调查结果强调了根据每所学校的具体情况和需要加强和调整初级保健教育的重要性,同时促进跨专业合作,以加强社区保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书