Retesting reverse-reward performance in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) after 16 years: evidence of aging-related decline.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Yui Sugimoto, James R Anderson, Hika Kuroshima
{"title":"Retesting reverse-reward performance in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) after 16 years: evidence of aging-related decline.","authors":"Yui Sugimoto, James R Anderson, Hika Kuroshima","doi":"10.1007/s10329-026-01246-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In reverse-reward contingency tasks, the subject chooses between two potential rewards differing in value. To receive the higher-value reward, the subject must reach toward the lower-value reward; any reach toward the higher-value reward results in receiving the lower-value reward. In studies on animals, the rewards are usually food items differing in quantity or quality. Sixteen years after participating in reverse-reward tests, captive adult capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) were retested under the same conditions. We asked whether there would be evidence of memory of previous learning, or aging-related effects on performance. As previously, monkeys first experienced a \"quantity\" condition and then switched to a \"quality\" condition, or vice-versa. The two best-performing monkeys 16 years earlier showed significantly poorer performance in the present study, indicating possible age-related decline in reverse-reward competence. By contrast, a monkey not yet fully adult 16 years earlier but now 23 years old learned the R-R contingency in the quality condition, which suggests that inhibitory control ability in this species can be expressed at least into their 20s. Other individuals' performances were similar to those of 16 years ago, some associated with side preferences. Assessments of age-related changes in inhibitory control need to consider task characteristics and behavioral biases. Combining longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches may be optimal for clarifying the development and later decline of cognitive abilities across the lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":20468,"journal":{"name":"Primates","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primates","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-026-01246-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In reverse-reward contingency tasks, the subject chooses between two potential rewards differing in value. To receive the higher-value reward, the subject must reach toward the lower-value reward; any reach toward the higher-value reward results in receiving the lower-value reward. In studies on animals, the rewards are usually food items differing in quantity or quality. Sixteen years after participating in reverse-reward tests, captive adult capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella) were retested under the same conditions. We asked whether there would be evidence of memory of previous learning, or aging-related effects on performance. As previously, monkeys first experienced a "quantity" condition and then switched to a "quality" condition, or vice-versa. The two best-performing monkeys 16 years earlier showed significantly poorer performance in the present study, indicating possible age-related decline in reverse-reward competence. By contrast, a monkey not yet fully adult 16 years earlier but now 23 years old learned the R-R contingency in the quality condition, which suggests that inhibitory control ability in this species can be expressed at least into their 20s. Other individuals' performances were similar to those of 16 years ago, some associated with side preferences. Assessments of age-related changes in inhibitory control need to consider task characteristics and behavioral biases. Combining longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches may be optimal for clarifying the development and later decline of cognitive abilities across the lifespan.

16年后重新测试卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)的反向奖励表现:衰老相关衰退的证据。
在反向奖励偶然性任务中,受试者在两个价值不同的潜在奖励之间进行选择。为了获得高价值的奖励,被试必须向低价值的奖励伸手;任何追求高价值奖励的行为都会导致获得低价值奖励。在对动物的研究中,奖励通常是不同数量或质量的食物。在参与反向奖励测试16年后,圈养的成年卷尾猴(Sapajus apella)在相同的条件下再次接受测试。我们询问是否有证据表明,以前学习的记忆或与年龄有关的影响对表现有影响。和之前一样,猴子首先经历了“数量”条件,然后切换到“质量”条件,反之亦然。16年前表现最好的两只猴子在目前的研究中表现明显较差,表明可能与年龄有关的反向奖励能力下降。相比之下,一只猴子在16年前还没有完全成年,但现在已经23岁了,它在质量条件下学会了R-R偶然性,这表明这个物种的抑制控制能力至少可以表达到20多岁。其他个体的表现与16年前相似,其中一些与侧p有关。对抑制控制与年龄相关的变化的评估需要考虑任务特征和行为偏见。结合纵向和横断面的方法可能是最理想的,以阐明整个生命周期中认知能力的发展和后来的衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primates
Primates 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Primates is an international journal of primatology whose aim is to provide a forum for the elucidation of all aspects of primates. The oldest primatological journal, Primates publishes original papers that advance the scientific study of primates, and its scope embraces work in diverse fields covering biological bases of behavior, socio-ecology, learning and cognition, social processes, systematics, evolution, and medicine. Contributions relevant to conservation of natural populations and welfare of captive primates are welcome. Studies focusing on nonprimate species may be considered if their relevance to primatology is clear. Original Articles as well as Review Articles, News and Perspectives, and Book Reviews are included. All manuscripts received are initially screened for suitability by members of the Editorial Board, taking into account style and ethical issues, leading to a swift decision about whether to send the manuscript for external review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书