Analysis of academic stress factors in basic medical science courses among medical students: suggestions for curriculum improvement.

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-23 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2025.072
Gwanwook Bang, So-Youn Park
{"title":"Analysis of academic stress factors in basic medical science courses among medical students: suggestions for curriculum improvement.","authors":"Gwanwook Bang, So-Youn Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2025.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify the academic stress experienced by medical students in basic medical science courses and analyze its underlying factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among 228 students from a medical school in Seoul, South Korea, of whom 204 who had completed at least one basic science course were included in the final analysis. A modified stress scale for medical students and a newly developed subject-specific academic stress scale, validated through literature review, student feedback, and expert review, were employed. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 with descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall academic stress among students was relatively high. The highest stress levels were observed in cell biology (mean=7.15), followed by bioinformatics (mean=5.97), molecular biology (mean=5.47), and organic chemistry (mean=5.20). Key stress factors included a lack of connectivity with clinical subjects, excessive learning volume, and inappropriate difficulty levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic stress varied significantly across courses, underscoring the need for curriculum improvements in basic medical science education. Faculty should consider adjusting course difficulty, enhancing clinical integration, motivating students, and managing workloads to reduce stress and support learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"38 1","pages":"54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12971140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the academic stress experienced by medical students in basic medical science courses and analyze its underlying factors.

Methods: A survey was conducted among 228 students from a medical school in Seoul, South Korea, of whom 204 who had completed at least one basic science course were included in the final analysis. A modified stress scale for medical students and a newly developed subject-specific academic stress scale, validated through literature review, student feedback, and expert review, were employed. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS ver. 25.0 with descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and one-way analysis of variance.

Results: The overall academic stress among students was relatively high. The highest stress levels were observed in cell biology (mean=7.15), followed by bioinformatics (mean=5.97), molecular biology (mean=5.47), and organic chemistry (mean=5.20). Key stress factors included a lack of connectivity with clinical subjects, excessive learning volume, and inappropriate difficulty levels.

Conclusion: Academic stress varied significantly across courses, underscoring the need for curriculum improvements in basic medical science education. Faculty should consider adjusting course difficulty, enhancing clinical integration, motivating students, and managing workloads to reduce stress and support learning outcomes.

医学生基础医学课程学业压力因素分析:课程改进建议。
目的:了解医学生在基础医学课程中的学业压力,并分析其影响因素。方法:对韩国首尔某医学院228名学生进行调查,其中完成至少一门基础科学课程的学生204名被纳入最终分析。采用修订后的医学生压力量表和新编制的医学生学业压力量表,经文献查阅、学生反馈和专家评审验证。数据采用IBM SPSS ver进行分析。25.0采用描述性统计、t检验、卡方检验和单因素方差分析。结果:大学生学业压力总体较高。应激水平最高的学科是细胞生物学(平均为7.15),其次是生物信息学(平均为5.97)、分子生物学(平均为5.47)和有机化学(平均为5.20)。主要的压力因素包括缺乏与临床科目的联系,过多的学习量和不适当的难度水平。结论:不同课程的学习压力差异显著,强调了基础医学教育课程改进的必要性。教师应考虑调整课程难度、加强临床整合、激励学生和管理工作量,以减轻压力并支持学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书