Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Photometric and LC Assay Methods for Hydroxyanthracene Glycosides Determination in Senna Herbal Drugs and Dry Extracts.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Planta medica Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2828-2181
Samuel Peter, Alexander Schenk, Heidemarie Höwer-Fritzen, Anke Steuber, Evelyn Wolfram, Bruno Wagner, Barbara Steinhoff
{"title":"Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Photometric and LC Assay Methods for Hydroxyanthracene Glycosides Determination in Senna Herbal Drugs and Dry Extracts.","authors":"Samuel Peter, Alexander Schenk, Heidemarie Höwer-Fritzen, Anke Steuber, Evelyn Wolfram, Bruno Wagner, Barbara Steinhoff","doi":"10.1055/a-2828-2181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Herbal preparations of <i>Senna</i> leaves or fruits are commonly used as laxatives. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) sets a daily dose of 10 - 30 mg for the hydroxyanthracene glycosides (HAG) determined by spectrophotometry. A recent revision of the European Pharmacopoeia monographs on <i>Senna</i> replaced the photometric assay with HPLC. The new method offers improved reproducibility and specificity but results in lower content, while the dose recommendation in the EMA monograph still refers to the photometric determination.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The systematic difference between the photometric and the HPLC method has been studied in a collaborative inter-laboratory trial by seven participating quality control laboratories. The goal was to compare precision and reproducibility and ideally to derive a conversion factor. The HAG determination by spectrophotometry according to the method from Ph. Eur. Edition 8.3. was compared to the HPLC assay according to the new method for <i>Senna</i> leaves or pods (Ph. Eur. Ed. 10.1).</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The photometric method showed a low inter-laboratory reproducibility of about ± 28% (RSD) but an intra-laboratory precision of around 2%, while the HPLC method showed an inter-laboratory precision of around ± 10% and an intra-laboratory precision of 1.5%.</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Assay values obtained by HPLC were about 90% of the values of the photometric method, but this relation seems to be sample dependent. Because of its dependency on the raw material, a simple conversion factor between the two methods is not yet satisfying, but an additional method-specific dose recommendation for the EMA monographs is proposed by the authors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20127,"journal":{"name":"Planta medica","volume":" ","pages":"1041-1048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2828-2181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Herbal preparations of Senna leaves or fruits are commonly used as laxatives. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) sets a daily dose of 10 - 30 mg for the hydroxyanthracene glycosides (HAG) determined by spectrophotometry. A recent revision of the European Pharmacopoeia monographs on Senna replaced the photometric assay with HPLC. The new method offers improved reproducibility and specificity but results in lower content, while the dose recommendation in the EMA monograph still refers to the photometric determination.

Abstract: The systematic difference between the photometric and the HPLC method has been studied in a collaborative inter-laboratory trial by seven participating quality control laboratories. The goal was to compare precision and reproducibility and ideally to derive a conversion factor. The HAG determination by spectrophotometry according to the method from Ph. Eur. Edition 8.3. was compared to the HPLC assay according to the new method for Senna leaves or pods (Ph. Eur. Ed. 10.1).

Abstract: The photometric method showed a low inter-laboratory reproducibility of about ± 28% (RSD) but an intra-laboratory precision of around 2%, while the HPLC method showed an inter-laboratory precision of around ± 10% and an intra-laboratory precision of 1.5%.

Abstract: Assay values obtained by HPLC were about 90% of the values of the photometric method, but this relation seems to be sample dependent. Because of its dependency on the raw material, a simple conversion factor between the two methods is not yet satisfying, but an additional method-specific dose recommendation for the EMA monographs is proposed by the authors.

光度法和液相色谱法测定番泻中草药和干提取物中羟基蒽苷的实验室间比较。
由番泻叶或果实制成的草药制剂通常用作泻药。欧洲药品管理局(EMA)为分光光度法测定的羟基蒽糖苷(HAG)设定了10-30毫克的日剂量。最近修订的欧洲药典关于番泻草的专著用高效液相色谱法取代了光度法。新方法可提高重现性和特异性,但含量较低,而EMA各论中推荐的剂量仍然是光度测定法。光度法和高效液相色谱法之间的系统差异已经在7个参与质量控制实验室的合作实验室间试验中进行了研究。目标是比较精度和再现性,理想情况下推导出一个转换因子。采用分光光度法测定Ph. Eur。8.3版。采用HPLC法测定番泻叶或豆荚(Ph. Eur.)的含量。艾德。10.1)。光度法的实验室间重现性较低,RSD约为±28%,实验室内精密度约为2%;HPLC法的实验室间精密度约为±10%,实验室内精密度约为1.5%。HPLC法得到的测定值约为光度法的90%,但这种关系似乎与样品有关。由于其对原料的依赖性,两种方法之间的简单转换因子尚不能令人满意,但作者提出了针对EMA各论的额外方法特异性剂量推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Planta medica
Planta medica 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Planta Medica is one of the leading international journals in the field of natural products – including marine organisms, fungi as well as micro-organisms – and medicinal plants. Planta Medica accepts original research papers, reviews, minireviews and perspectives from researchers worldwide. The journal publishes 18 issues per year. The following areas of medicinal plants and natural product research are covered: -Biological and Pharmacological Activities -Natural Product Chemistry & Analytical Studies -Pharmacokinetic Investigations -Formulation and Delivery Systems of Natural Products. The journal explicitly encourages the submission of chemically characterized extracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书