How to choose cut-off points: statistical and clinical perspectives.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Boohwi Hong, Chahyun Oh, Sang Gyu Kwak
{"title":"How to choose cut-off points: statistical and clinical perspectives.","authors":"Boohwi Hong, Chahyun Oh, Sang Gyu Kwak","doi":"10.4097/kja.26031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous variables are often dichotomized or categorized in clinical research to improve interpretability or to align with clinical thresholds. However, arbitrary or poorly justified cut-off points can cause substantial information loss, reduced statistical power, and potentially misleading conclusions. In this article, we describe commonly used approaches for determining cut-off points, including guideline-based thresholds, median, or quantile splits, and statistically derived methods, such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-based approaches (e.g., Youden Index and related criteria). We also discuss the clinical and methodological implications of these approaches using illustrative examples and offer practical recommendations to support the transparent and appropriate use of cut-offs in anesthesia and perioperative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.26031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous variables are often dichotomized or categorized in clinical research to improve interpretability or to align with clinical thresholds. However, arbitrary or poorly justified cut-off points can cause substantial information loss, reduced statistical power, and potentially misleading conclusions. In this article, we describe commonly used approaches for determining cut-off points, including guideline-based thresholds, median, or quantile splits, and statistically derived methods, such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve-based approaches (e.g., Youden Index and related criteria). We also discuss the clinical and methodological implications of these approaches using illustrative examples and offer practical recommendations to support the transparent and appropriate use of cut-offs in anesthesia and perioperative research.

如何选择分界点:统计学和临床观点。
在临床研究中,连续变量经常被二分类或分类,以提高可解释性或与临床阈值保持一致。然而,武断的或不合理的分界点可能导致大量信息丢失,降低统计能力,并可能导致误导性结论。在本文中,我们描述了确定截止点的常用方法,包括基于指南的阈值、中位数或分位数分割,以及统计衍生方法,如基于受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的方法(例如,约登指数和相关标准)。我们还通过举例讨论了这些方法的临床和方法学意义,并提供了实用的建议,以支持在麻醉和围手术期研究中透明和适当地使用切口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书