Evaluating tact instruction in two languages for bilingual children with autism spectrum disorder

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xuehua Zhao, Mirela Cengher, Tianjiao Li, Mariéle Diniz Cortez, Caio F. Miguel
{"title":"Evaluating tact instruction in two languages for bilingual children with autism spectrum disorder","authors":"Xuehua Zhao,&nbsp;Mirela Cengher,&nbsp;Tianjiao Li,&nbsp;Mariéle Diniz Cortez,&nbsp;Caio F. Miguel","doi":"10.1002/jaba.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bilingual individuals can acquire two languages simultaneously or sequentially. Study 1 examined the effects of simultaneous instruction (introducing tacts in both languages at the same time) and sequential instruction (introducing tacts in English, followed by a second language after mastery) with four children with autism. Both instructional procedures were effective, but simultaneous instruction promoted better conditional discriminations between the two languages than sequential instruction. Study 2 compared monolingual with bilingual (sequential) instruction with three participants. Teaching tacts in a single language was substantially more efficient than teaching tacts in two languages for all participants. As in Study 1, participants required additional simultaneous teaching after mastering sequentially taught targets to establish conditional discriminations, whereas monolingual instruction required no additional teaching. These results indicate that monolingual instruction is more efficient than sequential bilingual instruction, although sequential bilingual teaching can still be effective. The findings have important implications for designing bilingual instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bilingual individuals can acquire two languages simultaneously or sequentially. Study 1 examined the effects of simultaneous instruction (introducing tacts in both languages at the same time) and sequential instruction (introducing tacts in English, followed by a second language after mastery) with four children with autism. Both instructional procedures were effective, but simultaneous instruction promoted better conditional discriminations between the two languages than sequential instruction. Study 2 compared monolingual with bilingual (sequential) instruction with three participants. Teaching tacts in a single language was substantially more efficient than teaching tacts in two languages for all participants. As in Study 1, participants required additional simultaneous teaching after mastering sequentially taught targets to establish conditional discriminations, whereas monolingual instruction required no additional teaching. These results indicate that monolingual instruction is more efficient than sequential bilingual instruction, although sequential bilingual teaching can still be effective. The findings have important implications for designing bilingual instruction.

评估双语儿童自闭症谱系障碍的两种语言机智教学。
双语者可以同时或依次习得两种语言。研究1考察了同时教学(同时用两种语言介绍词性)和顺序教学(用英语介绍词性,掌握后再学习第二语言)对四个自闭症儿童的影响。两种教学程序都是有效的,但同时教学比顺序教学更能促进两种语言之间的条件歧视。研究2比较了三名参与者的单语和双语(顺序)教学。对所有参与者来说,用一种语言教学的技巧比用两种语言教学的技巧要有效得多。在研究1中,参与者在掌握顺序教学目标后需要额外的同步教学来建立条件辨别,而单语教学不需要额外的教学。这些结果表明,单语教学比顺序双语教学更有效,尽管顺序双语教学仍然有效。研究结果对设计双语教学具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书