A scoping review to examine the function, safety, effectiveness, efficacy and acceptability of the female condom used during anal sex.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1177/09564624261430245
Mags Beksinska, Yolandie Kriel, Tammany Cavanagh, Bidia Deperthes, Tim Sladden
{"title":"A scoping review to examine the function, safety, effectiveness, efficacy and acceptability of the female condom used during anal sex.","authors":"Mags Beksinska, Yolandie Kriel, Tammany Cavanagh, Bidia Deperthes, Tim Sladden","doi":"10.1177/09564624261430245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLimited guidance exists when female condoms are used for anal sex. We evaluated the available evidence regarding the effectiveness, efficacy, function, safety, and acceptability of the female condom for use during anal sex.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review with narrative analysis. We searched PubMed, Ovid (EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Ovid Medline), Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, HMSS database, Elsevier/Science Direct, Cochrane, EBSCO Host, and JSTOR. Eligible studies were included if they reported on the use of the female condom during anal sex. There was no restriction on the type of studies.ResultsTwelve studies were identified: seven cross-sectional surveys, three randomised cross-over trials, and two qualitative studies. Function outcomes mainly included slippage and breakage and aside from one study were reported per participant and not by numbers of condoms used. Definitions of female condom failures varied across studies. Slippage was reported by 14.5%-52.5% of users, while breakage reports were under 5.0%. Acceptability outcomes included likeability, pleasure, usage ease, design issues, discomfort, and sensitivity. Participants found usage challenging in general especially difficulties in insertion and placement of the inner ring. Reporting of pleasure was mixed with differing opinions by insertive and receptive partners. Five studies included safety outcomes which included pain, bleeding, discomfort, and irritation. More than half of participants reported at least one safety outcome. No studies reported on female condom effectiveness or efficacy in prevention of STIs/HIV when used for anal sex. The assessment of the data quality overall was poor.ConclusionsDue to the data limitations, is not possible to determine any conclusive findings about the function, safety, acceptability or effectiveness/efficacy in STI/HIV prevention of the female condom use during anal sex. There is an urgent need for quality evidence to inform guidance on female condom use when used for anal sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"725-737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624261430245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionLimited guidance exists when female condoms are used for anal sex. We evaluated the available evidence regarding the effectiveness, efficacy, function, safety, and acceptability of the female condom for use during anal sex.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review with narrative analysis. We searched PubMed, Ovid (EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Ovid Medline), Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest, HMSS database, Elsevier/Science Direct, Cochrane, EBSCO Host, and JSTOR. Eligible studies were included if they reported on the use of the female condom during anal sex. There was no restriction on the type of studies.ResultsTwelve studies were identified: seven cross-sectional surveys, three randomised cross-over trials, and two qualitative studies. Function outcomes mainly included slippage and breakage and aside from one study were reported per participant and not by numbers of condoms used. Definitions of female condom failures varied across studies. Slippage was reported by 14.5%-52.5% of users, while breakage reports were under 5.0%. Acceptability outcomes included likeability, pleasure, usage ease, design issues, discomfort, and sensitivity. Participants found usage challenging in general especially difficulties in insertion and placement of the inner ring. Reporting of pleasure was mixed with differing opinions by insertive and receptive partners. Five studies included safety outcomes which included pain, bleeding, discomfort, and irritation. More than half of participants reported at least one safety outcome. No studies reported on female condom effectiveness or efficacy in prevention of STIs/HIV when used for anal sex. The assessment of the data quality overall was poor.ConclusionsDue to the data limitations, is not possible to determine any conclusive findings about the function, safety, acceptability or effectiveness/efficacy in STI/HIV prevention of the female condom use during anal sex. There is an urgent need for quality evidence to inform guidance on female condom use when used for anal sex.

一项范围审查,审查在肛交中使用的女用避孕套的功能,安全性,有效性,功效和可接受性。
在肛交时使用女用避孕套的指导是有限的。我们评估了关于在肛交中使用女用避孕套的有效性、功效、功能、安全性和可接受性的现有证据。方法采用叙事分析法进行范围综述。我们检索了PubMed、Ovid (EMBASE、PsycINFO、Global Health、Ovid Medline)、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar、ProQuest、HMSS数据库、Elsevier/Science Direct、Cochrane、EBSCO Host和JSTOR。符合条件的研究包括在肛交中使用女用避孕套的报告。对研究的类型没有限制。结果共纳入12项研究:7项横断面调查、3项随机交叉试验和2项定性研究。功能结果主要包括滑动和破裂,除了一项研究外,报告的是每个参与者,而不是使用避孕套的数量。不同研究对女用避孕套失效的定义各不相同。14.5%-52.5%的用户报告滑动,而破损报告低于5.0%。可接受性结果包括喜爱度、愉悦度、易用性、设计问题、不适和敏感性。参与者发现使用具有挑战性,特别是在插入和放置内环方面的困难。插入性伴侣和接受性伴侣对快乐的报告有不同的看法。五项研究包括了安全性结果,包括疼痛、出血、不适和刺激。超过一半的参与者报告了至少一项安全结果。没有研究报告说,在肛交时使用女用避孕套在预防性传播感染/艾滋病毒方面的有效性。对数据质量的总体评估较差。结论由于资料的限制,无法对肛交时使用女用避孕套的功能、安全性、可接受性或预防性病/艾滋病的有效性做出结论性结论。迫切需要高质量的证据来指导在肛交时使用女用避孕套。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书