Machine learning-based prognostic prediction for cutaneous malignant melanoma patient survival.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-15 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2026.2644385
Yuxin Wang, Jiajia Liu, Huawei Wu, Hui Zhai
{"title":"Machine learning-based prognostic prediction for cutaneous malignant melanoma patient survival.","authors":"Yuxin Wang, Jiajia Liu, Huawei Wu, Hui Zhai","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2026.2644385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is a highly malignant tumor that necessitates early diagnosis and precise survival prediction. The development of accurate prognostic models is essential for improving patient survival.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data from 5979 CMM patients in the SEER database (2004-2015), with external validation using the TCGA dataset. Patients were randomly allocated to training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. The SMOTE+DeepSurv (DeepSmote) model was compared against seven models, including DeepSurv, XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree (DT). Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DeepSmote model demonstrated superior prognostic performance across both SEER and TCGA datasets. On the SEER test set, it achieved an AUC of 0.96, accuracy of 0.95, and F1-score of 0.95 for 1-year prediction. This strong performance was maintained in the external TCGA cohort (AUC: 0.91, accuracy: 0.88, F1-score: 0.87), and consistent superiority was observed for 3- and 5-year predictions, confirming its robustness and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DeepSmote provides an accurate, generalizable prognostic tool for CMM survival prediction, outperforming other models across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"947-959"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2026.2644385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is a highly malignant tumor that necessitates early diagnosis and precise survival prediction. The development of accurate prognostic models is essential for improving patient survival.

Research design and methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 5979 CMM patients in the SEER database (2004-2015), with external validation using the TCGA dataset. Patients were randomly allocated to training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. The SMOTE+DeepSurv (DeepSmote) model was compared against seven models, including DeepSurv, XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Tree (DT). Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

Results: The DeepSmote model demonstrated superior prognostic performance across both SEER and TCGA datasets. On the SEER test set, it achieved an AUC of 0.96, accuracy of 0.95, and F1-score of 0.95 for 1-year prediction. This strong performance was maintained in the external TCGA cohort (AUC: 0.91, accuracy: 0.88, F1-score: 0.87), and consistent superiority was observed for 3- and 5-year predictions, confirming its robustness and generalizability.

Conclusion: DeepSmote provides an accurate, generalizable prognostic tool for CMM survival prediction, outperforming other models across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics.

基于机器学习的皮肤恶性黑色素瘤患者生存预测。
背景:皮肤恶性黑色素瘤(CMM)是一种高度恶性肿瘤,需要早期诊断和准确的生存预测。发展准确的预后模型对于提高患者生存率至关重要。研究设计和方法:本回顾性研究分析了SEER数据库(2004-2015)中5979例慢性mm患者的数据,并使用TCGA数据集进行了外部验证。患者按7:3的比例随机分配到训练组和测试组。将SMOTE+DeepSurv (DeepSmote)模型与DeepSurv、XGBoost、Logistic回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、k近邻(KNN)和决策树(DT)等7种模型进行了比较。使用曲线下面积(Area Under the Curve, AUC)、准确度、精密度、召回率和f1评分来评估模型的性能。结果:DeepSmote模型在SEER和TCGA数据集上均表现出优越的预后性能。在SEER测试集上,1年预测AUC为0.96,准确率为0.95,f1得分为0.95。在外部TCGA队列中(AUC: 0.91,准确度:0.88,f1评分:0.87)保持了这种强劲的表现,并且在3年和5年预测中观察到一致的优势,证实了其稳健性和普遍性。结论:DeepSmote为CMM生存预测提供了一个准确、通用的预测工具,在多个数据集和评估指标上优于其他模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书