Are dating and sexual Protective Behavioral Strategies (PBS) associated with alcohol-related consequences at all levels of alcohol use?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1037/pha0000838
Roselyn Peterson, Sthefani C Paitan, Olivia A Belitsos, Joliza C Maynard, Jennifer E Merrill, Robert Dvorak
{"title":"Are dating and sexual Protective Behavioral Strategies (PBS) associated with alcohol-related consequences at all levels of alcohol use?","authors":"Roselyn Peterson, Sthefani C Paitan, Olivia A Belitsos, Joliza C Maynard, Jennifer E Merrill, Robert Dvorak","doi":"10.1037/pha0000838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alcohol use is common among college students and often linked to negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) can reduce alcohol use and related harms. This study examined whether dating/sexual PBS provide unique protective effects beyond alcohol PBS. We tested three hypotheses: (1) dating/sexual PBS would predict fewer drinks at follow up, controlling for alcohol PBS; (2) dating/sexual PBS would predict fewer alcohol-related consequences at follow up, controlling for alcohol PBS; and (3) drinks per week would moderate the association between dating/sexual PBS and consequences, with stronger protection for heavier drinkers. Participants (<i>n</i> = 324; 78.1% female, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.2, <i>SD</i> = 2.2, 71.3% White) completed baseline and 1-month follow-up surveys measuring alcohol PBS, dating/sexual PBS, typical drinks per week, and alcohol-related consequences. Baseline dating/sexual PBS did not predict follow-up drinks per week after controlling for alcohol PBS, logistic regression χ²(7) = 100.59, Cragg-Uhler <i>R</i>² = .281. However, dating/sexual PBS predicted fewer follow-up alcohol-related consequences (incident rate ratios [IRR] = 0.73, <i>p</i> = .022), with drinks per week moderating this effect. Contrary to expectation, dating/sexual PBS were protective at low levels of drinking (IRR = 0.57, <i>p</i> = .002) but not at high levels (IRR = 0.88, <i>p</i> = .391). Dating/sexual PBS reduce alcohol-related consequences over 1-month, particularly among students with low to average drinking levels. These findings emphasize the importance of both alcohol-specific and dating/sexual PBS in college alcohol risk reduction interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"189-195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alcohol use is common among college students and often linked to negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) can reduce alcohol use and related harms. This study examined whether dating/sexual PBS provide unique protective effects beyond alcohol PBS. We tested three hypotheses: (1) dating/sexual PBS would predict fewer drinks at follow up, controlling for alcohol PBS; (2) dating/sexual PBS would predict fewer alcohol-related consequences at follow up, controlling for alcohol PBS; and (3) drinks per week would moderate the association between dating/sexual PBS and consequences, with stronger protection for heavier drinkers. Participants (n = 324; 78.1% female, Mage = 19.2, SD = 2.2, 71.3% White) completed baseline and 1-month follow-up surveys measuring alcohol PBS, dating/sexual PBS, typical drinks per week, and alcohol-related consequences. Baseline dating/sexual PBS did not predict follow-up drinks per week after controlling for alcohol PBS, logistic regression χ²(7) = 100.59, Cragg-Uhler R² = .281. However, dating/sexual PBS predicted fewer follow-up alcohol-related consequences (incident rate ratios [IRR] = 0.73, p = .022), with drinks per week moderating this effect. Contrary to expectation, dating/sexual PBS were protective at low levels of drinking (IRR = 0.57, p = .002) but not at high levels (IRR = 0.88, p = .391). Dating/sexual PBS reduce alcohol-related consequences over 1-month, particularly among students with low to average drinking levels. These findings emphasize the importance of both alcohol-specific and dating/sexual PBS in college alcohol risk reduction interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

约会和性保护行为策略(PBS)与所有饮酒水平的酒精相关后果有关吗?
饮酒在大学生中很常见,而且往往与负面后果有关。保护性行为策略(PBS)可以减少酒精使用和相关危害。这项研究调查了约会/性PBS是否提供比酒精PBS更独特的保护作用。我们检验了三个假设:(1)在控制酒精PBS的情况下,约会/性PBS预测随访时饮酒量减少;(2)在控制酒精PBS的情况下,约会/性PBS对随访中酒精相关后果的预测较少;(3)每周饮酒会缓和约会/性PBS与后果之间的关联,对重度饮酒者有更强的保护。参与者(n = 324; 78.1%女性,Mage = 19.2, SD = 2.2, 71.3%白人)完成了基线和1个月的随访调查,测量酒精PBS、约会/性PBS、每周典型饮酒量和酒精相关后果。控制酒精PBS后,基线约会/性PBS不能预测随访每周饮酒量,logistic回归χ²(7)= 100.59,Cragg-Uhler R²= 0.281。然而,约会/性PBS预测更少的后续酒精相关后果(发生率比[IRR] = 0.73, p = 0.022),每周饮酒会缓和这种影响。与预期相反,约会/性PBS在低水平饮酒时具有保护作用(IRR = 0.57, p = 0.002),但在高水平饮酒时则没有保护作用(IRR = 0.88, p = 0.391)。约会/性PBS在一个月内减少了与酒精有关的后果,特别是在饮酒量低至平均水平的学生中。这些发现强调了酒精特异性和约会/性PBS在大学酒精风险降低干预中的重要性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书