The impact of space closure versus space opening and prosthetic rehabilitation treatment on a young person's quality of life, aesthetics, and self-esteem in hypodontia: a longitudinal prospective study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ama Johal, Rabia Dean, Mandana Amin, Shakeel Shahdad, Ferranti Wong
{"title":"The impact of space closure versus space opening and prosthetic rehabilitation treatment on a young person's quality of life, aesthetics, and self-esteem in hypodontia: a longitudinal prospective study.","authors":"Ama Johal, Rabia Dean, Mandana Amin, Shakeel Shahdad, Ferranti Wong","doi":"10.1093/ejo/cjag003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present research study uniquely aimed to evaluate the impact of undergoing orthodontic and restorative treatment on a young person's oral health-related quality of life (QoL), self-esteem and aesthetics in relation to the management of hypodontia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal hospital-based study recruited 97 participants with hypodontia, aged 11-18 years. The following questionnaires were completed both prior (T0) and after the completion of treatment by either space closure or opening and restorative rehabilitation (T1) treatment: child perception questionnaire, Bristol condition specific questionnaire for hypodontia (BCS), child health questionnaire and the Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Scale. The outcome variables was the end of treatment measurements, all of which were continuous in nature. The analysis was performed using analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 participants were lost to follow up. At the completion of treatment (T1), 71 participants completed all four questionnaires. In this cohort, there were 31 participants in the space opening and 40 in the space closure group. For both groups, improvements were observed in both QoL, self-esteem and dental aesthetics. Whilst Overall, there was no statistically significant difference detected in a number of outcomes between the two groups differences were detected in the majority of domains of the BCS, favourable towards space closure (P < .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment in participants with a range of hypodontia severity appears to have a significant positive impact, both psychologically and in terms of aesthetics. Furthermore, with the exception of the BCS, no difference in the outcomes was detected irrespective of whether participants underwent either orthodontic space closure or space opening, with subsequent prosthetic replacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11989,"journal":{"name":"European journal of orthodontics","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13017484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjag003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present research study uniquely aimed to evaluate the impact of undergoing orthodontic and restorative treatment on a young person's oral health-related quality of life (QoL), self-esteem and aesthetics in relation to the management of hypodontia.

Materials and methods: A prospective longitudinal hospital-based study recruited 97 participants with hypodontia, aged 11-18 years. The following questionnaires were completed both prior (T0) and after the completion of treatment by either space closure or opening and restorative rehabilitation (T1) treatment: child perception questionnaire, Bristol condition specific questionnaire for hypodontia (BCS), child health questionnaire and the Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Scale. The outcome variables was the end of treatment measurements, all of which were continuous in nature. The analysis was performed using analysis of covariance.

Results: A total of 26 participants were lost to follow up. At the completion of treatment (T1), 71 participants completed all four questionnaires. In this cohort, there were 31 participants in the space opening and 40 in the space closure group. For both groups, improvements were observed in both QoL, self-esteem and dental aesthetics. Whilst Overall, there was no statistically significant difference detected in a number of outcomes between the two groups differences were detected in the majority of domains of the BCS, favourable towards space closure (P < .03).

Conclusions: Treatment in participants with a range of hypodontia severity appears to have a significant positive impact, both psychologically and in terms of aesthetics. Furthermore, with the exception of the BCS, no difference in the outcomes was detected irrespective of whether participants underwent either orthodontic space closure or space opening, with subsequent prosthetic replacement.

空间封闭与空间开放及假体康复治疗对下颌畸形青少年生活质量、美学和自尊的影响:一项纵向前瞻性研究。
背景:本研究旨在评估接受正畸和修复治疗对年轻人口腔健康相关生活质量(QoL)、自尊和美学的影响。材料和方法:一项以医院为基础的前瞻性纵向研究招募了97名年龄在11-18岁的下颌缺损患者。在空间闭合或开放和恢复性康复(T1)治疗结束前(T0)和结束后分别完成以下问卷:儿童知觉问卷、下颌缺损Bristol条件特异性问卷(BCS)、儿童健康问卷和口腔审美主观影响量表。结果变量是治疗测量的结束,所有这些测量本质上都是连续的。采用协方差分析进行分析。结果:共失访26例。在治疗结束时(T1), 71名参与者完成了所有四份问卷。在这个队列中,空间开放组有31人,空间关闭组有40人。两组患者在生活质量、自尊和牙齿美观方面均有改善。总的来说,在两组之间的一些结果中没有统计学上的显著差异,在BCS的大多数域中检测到差异,有利于空间闭合(P < .03)。结论:在不同程度的下颌缺损患者中,治疗在心理和美学方面都有显著的积极影响。此外,除BCS外,无论参与者是否进行正畸间隙关闭或间隙打开并随后更换义肢,结果都没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European journal of orthodontics
European journal of orthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthodontics publishes papers of excellence on all aspects of orthodontics including craniofacial development and growth. The emphasis of the journal is on full research papers. Succinct and carefully prepared papers are favoured in terms of impact as well as readability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书