Port-site hernia following laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1111/aogs.70176
Franciszek Ługowski, Zofia Włodarczyk, Anna Owczarek, Łucja Zaborowska, Artur Ludwin
{"title":"Port-site hernia following laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Franciszek Ługowski, Zofia Włodarczyk, Anna Owczarek, Łucja Zaborowska, Artur Ludwin","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Port-site hernia (PSH) is a rare but clinically relevant complication of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Despite the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques, no prior systematic review has comprehensively evaluated PSH incidence and risk factors in this population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025649280). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without language or date restrictions. Eligible studies included randomized or cohort designs reporting PSH incidence after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Pooled incidence was calculated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies comprising 70 346 patients were included. The overall pooled PSH incidence was 0.29% (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02), with significant heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.3%). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers reduced heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 83.1%) without altering direction or significance. Elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, and advanced age were consistent patient-related risk factors, while larger trocar size (≥10 mm), single-port access, and inadequate fascial closure were major surgical contributors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSH following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery remains a rare but clinically significant occurrence. Surgical technique, particularly trocar size selection and fascial closure, plays a decisive role in risk reduction. Attention to modifiable intraoperative factors is crucial for optimizing patient safety and preventing postoperative hernia formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"778-794"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Port-site hernia (PSH) is a rare but clinically relevant complication of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Despite the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques, no prior systematic review has comprehensively evaluated PSH incidence and risk factors in this population.

Material and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025649280). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without language or date restrictions. Eligible studies included randomized or cohort designs reporting PSH incidence after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. Pooled incidence was calculated using a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-two studies comprising 70 346 patients were included. The overall pooled PSH incidence was 0.29% (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.3%). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers reduced heterogeneity (I2 = 83.1%) without altering direction or significance. Elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, and advanced age were consistent patient-related risk factors, while larger trocar size (≥10 mm), single-port access, and inadequate fascial closure were major surgical contributors.

Conclusions: PSH following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery remains a rare but clinically significant occurrence. Surgical technique, particularly trocar size selection and fascial closure, plays a decisive role in risk reduction. Attention to modifiable intraoperative factors is crucial for optimizing patient safety and preventing postoperative hernia formation.

腹腔镜妇科手术后肝部位疝:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
摘要Port-site hernia (PSH)是腹腔镜妇科手术中一种罕见但临床相关的并发症。尽管微创技术已被广泛采用,但在此之前还没有系统的综述全面评估PSH在该人群中的发病率和危险因素。材料和方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO (CRD42025649280)注册。PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase的检索没有语言或日期限制。符合条件的研究包括报告腹腔镜妇科手术后PSH发病率的随机或队列设计。合并发生率采用随机效应模型计算。结果:纳入22项研究,共70346例患者。总合并PSH发生率为0.29% (95% CI: 0.00 ~ 0.02),异质性显著(I2 = 99.3%)。排除异常值的敏感性分析降低了异质性(I2 = 83.1%),但没有改变方向或显著性。体重指数(BMI)升高、糖尿病和高龄是一致的患者相关危险因素,而较大的套管针尺寸(≥10 mm)、单孔通路和筋膜闭合不充分是主要的手术因素。结论:腹腔镜妇科手术后PSH仍然是一种罕见但具有临床意义的发生。手术技术,特别是套管针大小的选择和筋膜闭合,在降低风险中起决定性作用。注意可改变的术中因素对于优化患者安全和预防术后疝形成至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书