Adéla Jiříčková , Anna-Marie Lauermannová , Ondřej Jankovský , Michal Lojka , Martina Záleská , Adam Pivák , Milena Pavlíková , Zbyšek Pavlík
{"title":"Graphene oxide as a nanoadditive in cementitious composites: A comparative study of portland and magnesium oxychloride cement binders","authors":"Adéla Jiříčková , Anna-Marie Lauermannová , Ondřej Jankovský , Michal Lojka , Martina Záleská , Adam Pivák , Milena Pavlíková , Zbyšek Pavlík","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The addition of graphene oxide (GO) to cement-based materials can improve their mechanical performance and durability. However, there are few direct comparisons between different binder systems. While GO has been widely studied in Portland cement (PC), its effect on alternative binders like magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has usually been explored separately and under different experimental conditions. This study offers a direct comparison of GO-modified PC and MOC composites, with both prepared and tested under the same conditions. Composites containing up to 1.0 wt% GO were assessed using XRD, SEM, EDS, XRF, MIP, and thermal analysis, as well as mechanical and hygric testing. The results indicate that GO does not change the basic phase structure of either binder system but leads to different responses based on the system. Flexural strength increased by as much as 17.6% in PC and 13.4% in MOC composites. Compressive strength showed an optimal level at moderate GO amounts but declined at higher levels. Water absorption and transport were slightly lower, especially with increased GO amounts. In MOC composites, water resistance improved, shown by higher softening coefficients and retained compressive strength. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity increased with more GO content. These findings show that GO's effect varies with the type of binder. In hydration-based PC systems, its impact mainly appears in microstructure and mechanical response. In crystallization-based MOC systems, changes in water performance are more noticeable. The study offers a controlled comparison that aids in designing GO-modified cement-based materials for specific engineering uses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 145870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826007749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The addition of graphene oxide (GO) to cement-based materials can improve their mechanical performance and durability. However, there are few direct comparisons between different binder systems. While GO has been widely studied in Portland cement (PC), its effect on alternative binders like magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has usually been explored separately and under different experimental conditions. This study offers a direct comparison of GO-modified PC and MOC composites, with both prepared and tested under the same conditions. Composites containing up to 1.0 wt% GO were assessed using XRD, SEM, EDS, XRF, MIP, and thermal analysis, as well as mechanical and hygric testing. The results indicate that GO does not change the basic phase structure of either binder system but leads to different responses based on the system. Flexural strength increased by as much as 17.6% in PC and 13.4% in MOC composites. Compressive strength showed an optimal level at moderate GO amounts but declined at higher levels. Water absorption and transport were slightly lower, especially with increased GO amounts. In MOC composites, water resistance improved, shown by higher softening coefficients and retained compressive strength. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity increased with more GO content. These findings show that GO's effect varies with the type of binder. In hydration-based PC systems, its impact mainly appears in microstructure and mechanical response. In crystallization-based MOC systems, changes in water performance are more noticeable. The study offers a controlled comparison that aids in designing GO-modified cement-based materials for specific engineering uses.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.