Graphene oxide as a nanoadditive in cementitious composites: A comparative study of portland and magnesium oxychloride cement binders

IF 8.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Adéla Jiříčková , Anna-Marie Lauermannová , Ondřej Jankovský , Michal Lojka , Martina Záleská , Adam Pivák , Milena Pavlíková , Zbyšek Pavlík
{"title":"Graphene oxide as a nanoadditive in cementitious composites: A comparative study of portland and magnesium oxychloride cement binders","authors":"Adéla Jiříčková ,&nbsp;Anna-Marie Lauermannová ,&nbsp;Ondřej Jankovský ,&nbsp;Michal Lojka ,&nbsp;Martina Záleská ,&nbsp;Adam Pivák ,&nbsp;Milena Pavlíková ,&nbsp;Zbyšek Pavlík","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The addition of graphene oxide (GO) to cement-based materials can improve their mechanical performance and durability. However, there are few direct comparisons between different binder systems. While GO has been widely studied in Portland cement (PC), its effect on alternative binders like magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has usually been explored separately and under different experimental conditions. This study offers a direct comparison of GO-modified PC and MOC composites, with both prepared and tested under the same conditions. Composites containing up to 1.0 wt% GO were assessed using XRD, SEM, EDS, XRF, MIP, and thermal analysis, as well as mechanical and hygric testing. The results indicate that GO does not change the basic phase structure of either binder system but leads to different responses based on the system. Flexural strength increased by as much as 17.6% in PC and 13.4% in MOC composites. Compressive strength showed an optimal level at moderate GO amounts but declined at higher levels. Water absorption and transport were slightly lower, especially with increased GO amounts. In MOC composites, water resistance improved, shown by higher softening coefficients and retained compressive strength. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity increased with more GO content. These findings show that GO's effect varies with the type of binder. In hydration-based PC systems, its impact mainly appears in microstructure and mechanical response. In crystallization-based MOC systems, changes in water performance are more noticeable. The study offers a controlled comparison that aids in designing GO-modified cement-based materials for specific engineering uses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 145870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826007749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The addition of graphene oxide (GO) to cement-based materials can improve their mechanical performance and durability. However, there are few direct comparisons between different binder systems. While GO has been widely studied in Portland cement (PC), its effect on alternative binders like magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) has usually been explored separately and under different experimental conditions. This study offers a direct comparison of GO-modified PC and MOC composites, with both prepared and tested under the same conditions. Composites containing up to 1.0 wt% GO were assessed using XRD, SEM, EDS, XRF, MIP, and thermal analysis, as well as mechanical and hygric testing. The results indicate that GO does not change the basic phase structure of either binder system but leads to different responses based on the system. Flexural strength increased by as much as 17.6% in PC and 13.4% in MOC composites. Compressive strength showed an optimal level at moderate GO amounts but declined at higher levels. Water absorption and transport were slightly lower, especially with increased GO amounts. In MOC composites, water resistance improved, shown by higher softening coefficients and retained compressive strength. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity increased with more GO content. These findings show that GO's effect varies with the type of binder. In hydration-based PC systems, its impact mainly appears in microstructure and mechanical response. In crystallization-based MOC systems, changes in water performance are more noticeable. The study offers a controlled comparison that aids in designing GO-modified cement-based materials for specific engineering uses.
在胶凝复合材料中作为纳米添加剂的氧化石墨烯:硅酸盐和氯氧镁水泥粘结剂的比较研究
在水泥基材料中加入氧化石墨烯(GO)可以提高水泥基材料的力学性能和耐久性。然而,很少有不同粘结剂体系之间的直接比较。虽然氧化石墨烯在硅酸盐水泥(PC)中的应用已经得到了广泛的研究,但其对氯氧镁水泥(MOC)等替代粘结剂的影响通常是在不同的实验条件下单独研究的。本研究直接比较了氧化石墨烯改性PC和MOC复合材料在相同条件下制备和测试的结果。通过XRD、SEM、EDS、XRF、MIP、热分析以及力学和水力学测试,对氧化石墨烯含量高达1.0 wt%的复合材料进行了评估。结果表明,氧化石墨烯不会改变两种粘结剂体系的基本相结构,但会引起不同体系的反应。PC和MOC复合材料的抗弯强度分别提高了17.6%和13.4%。抗压强度在氧化石墨烯含量适中时表现为最佳水平,而在氧化石墨烯含量较高时则有所下降。吸水率和输水性略低,特别是随着氧化石墨烯量的增加。MOC复合材料的耐水性得到了改善,表现为更高的软化系数和保持的抗压强度。导热系数和体积热容随氧化石墨烯含量的增加而增加。这些发现表明,氧化石墨烯的效果随粘合剂的类型而变化。在水化PC体系中,其影响主要表现在微观结构和力学响应方面。在基于结晶的MOC体系中,水性能的变化更为明显。该研究提供了一个可控的比较,有助于设计用于特定工程用途的go改性水泥基材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书