Experimental analysis and finite element simulation of the flexural performance of glued laminated bamboo beam string structures

IF 8.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mingmin Ding , Zhenliang Hua , Yu Lin , Xiancai Zhong , Jiyang Yi , Yang Wei
{"title":"Experimental analysis and finite element simulation of the flexural performance of glued laminated bamboo beam string structures","authors":"Mingmin Ding ,&nbsp;Zhenliang Hua ,&nbsp;Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Xiancai Zhong ,&nbsp;Jiyang Yi ,&nbsp;Yang Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the low flexural stiffness and limited deformation of glued laminated bamboo (GLB) beams, this study introduces the beam string structure (BSS) system, aiming to investigate the effects of strut configuration and rise height on their flexural performance. Static tests were conducted on eight full-scale specimens, which were explicitly categorized into two configurations: (a) Straight BSS, varying in strut number (single vs. double) and strut length (130 mm vs. 160 mm); and (b) Arched BSS, varying in rise height (50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm). Simultaneously, a numerical model incorporating tension-compression asymmetry and Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) damage mechanisms was established, and theoretical formulas covering the entire loading process were derived. Results indicate that the BSS system significantly improved the mechanical performance of GLB beams. Among the straight configurations, the double long-strut type (TLSSB2S) exhibited optimal performance, with ultimate load capacity and energy dissipation increasing by 52.9% and 64.6%, respectively, compared to the pure beam. Conversely, for the simply supported arched configurations, both load capacity and stiffness showed a degradation trend as rise height increased. Numerical and theoretical predictions agreed well with experimental data, validating the effectiveness of this system for engineering applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 145854"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826007567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the low flexural stiffness and limited deformation of glued laminated bamboo (GLB) beams, this study introduces the beam string structure (BSS) system, aiming to investigate the effects of strut configuration and rise height on their flexural performance. Static tests were conducted on eight full-scale specimens, which were explicitly categorized into two configurations: (a) Straight BSS, varying in strut number (single vs. double) and strut length (130 mm vs. 160 mm); and (b) Arched BSS, varying in rise height (50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm). Simultaneously, a numerical model incorporating tension-compression asymmetry and Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM) damage mechanisms was established, and theoretical formulas covering the entire loading process were derived. Results indicate that the BSS system significantly improved the mechanical performance of GLB beams. Among the straight configurations, the double long-strut type (TLSSB2S) exhibited optimal performance, with ultimate load capacity and energy dissipation increasing by 52.9% and 64.6%, respectively, compared to the pure beam. Conversely, for the simply supported arched configurations, both load capacity and stiffness showed a degradation trend as rise height increased. Numerical and theoretical predictions agreed well with experimental data, validating the effectiveness of this system for engineering applications.
胶合竹梁串结构抗弯性能的实验分析与有限元模拟
针对竹材胶合梁抗弯刚度低、变形有限的问题,引入梁串结构(BSS)体系,研究竹材胶合梁的支撑结构形式和上升高度对其抗弯性能的影响。在8个全尺寸试件上进行了静力测试,这些试件明确分为两种配置:(a)直线型BSS,不同的支柱数量(单支柱vs双支柱)和支柱长度(130 mm vs 160 mm);(b)拱形BSS,上升高度不同(50 mm、100 mm和150 mm)。同时,建立了考虑拉压不对称和扩展有限元法(XFEM)损伤机理的数值模型,推导了涵盖整个加载过程的理论公式。结果表明,BSS系统显著改善了GLB梁的受力性能。在直线型结构中,双长杆型(TLSSB2S)表现最佳,其极限承载能力和耗能分别比纯梁提高52.9%和64.6%。相反,对于简支拱结构,随着上升高度的增加,其承载能力和刚度均呈退化趋势。数值和理论预测与实验数据吻合良好,验证了该系统在工程应用中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书