Durability performance of natural rubber latex and high-volume fly ash incorporation in hybrid fibres concrete under aggressive environments

IF 8.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Hassaan Bin Tariq, Roszilah Hamid, A.B.M. Amrul Kaish, Shahrizan Baharom, Anis Azmi
{"title":"Durability performance of natural rubber latex and high-volume fly ash incorporation in hybrid fibres concrete under aggressive environments","authors":"Hassaan Bin Tariq,&nbsp;Roszilah Hamid,&nbsp;A.B.M. Amrul Kaish,&nbsp;Shahrizan Baharom,&nbsp;Anis Azmi","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the combined effect of natural rubber latex (NRL) and high-volume fly ash (HVFA) on the durability performance of hybrid fibres concrete. Previous study has shown that incorporating 2.5% NRL and HVFA as cement replacement produces optimum mechanical properties of hybrid fibres concrete mix at 28 days (52 MPa - coded OM), compared to the control mix (56 MPa - coded CM). The specimens were then exposed to sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 5%), sodium sulphate (Na₂SO₄, 5%) and sodium chloride (NaCl, 3%) solutions. Results show that under acidic conditions, both mixes deteriorated severely, from 52 MPa and 56 MPa to 8 MPa and 9 MPa (180 days exposure). However, OM samples showed superior residual compressive strength, that is, higher 18%, 28%, and 17% at 56, 90, and 180 days exposure, respectively, and lower mass loss, less 20.5%, 68%, and 51.2%, compared to CM, complementing FESEM results showing pore refinement due to latex incorporation. Under sulphate and chloride exposures, both mixes show high resistance, with OM samples outperformed CM up to 90 days sulphate exposure, demonstrated through increased strength compared to 28 days strength and mass gain (peak 2.24% at 90 days – sulphate and 3.1% at 56 days - chloride) instead of mass loss. However, at 180 days, OM started to deteriorate, with reasonable strength losses (21% and 19%) but insignificant mass loses (1% and 0.3%) under sulphate and chloride, respectively. Physical observations confirmed volume changes in acid-exposed specimens, whereas no deterioration or significant volume change under sulphate and chloride environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 145873"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826007774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the combined effect of natural rubber latex (NRL) and high-volume fly ash (HVFA) on the durability performance of hybrid fibres concrete. Previous study has shown that incorporating 2.5% NRL and HVFA as cement replacement produces optimum mechanical properties of hybrid fibres concrete mix at 28 days (52 MPa - coded OM), compared to the control mix (56 MPa - coded CM). The specimens were then exposed to sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 5%), sodium sulphate (Na₂SO₄, 5%) and sodium chloride (NaCl, 3%) solutions. Results show that under acidic conditions, both mixes deteriorated severely, from 52 MPa and 56 MPa to 8 MPa and 9 MPa (180 days exposure). However, OM samples showed superior residual compressive strength, that is, higher 18%, 28%, and 17% at 56, 90, and 180 days exposure, respectively, and lower mass loss, less 20.5%, 68%, and 51.2%, compared to CM, complementing FESEM results showing pore refinement due to latex incorporation. Under sulphate and chloride exposures, both mixes show high resistance, with OM samples outperformed CM up to 90 days sulphate exposure, demonstrated through increased strength compared to 28 days strength and mass gain (peak 2.24% at 90 days – sulphate and 3.1% at 56 days - chloride) instead of mass loss. However, at 180 days, OM started to deteriorate, with reasonable strength losses (21% and 19%) but insignificant mass loses (1% and 0.3%) under sulphate and chloride, respectively. Physical observations confirmed volume changes in acid-exposed specimens, whereas no deterioration or significant volume change under sulphate and chloride environments.
天然胶乳与高掺量粉煤灰掺入混合纤维混凝土在恶劣环境下的耐久性性能
研究了天然胶乳(NRL)和大掺量粉煤灰(HVFA)对混杂纤维混凝土耐久性的综合影响。先前的研究表明,与对照混合料(56 MPa -编码CM)相比,加入2.5% NRL和HVFA作为水泥替代品,混合纤维混凝土混合料在28天(52 MPa -编码OM)的力学性能最佳。然后将样品暴露于硫酸(H₂SO₄,5%)、硫酸钠(Na₂SO₄,5%)和氯化钠(NaCl, 3%)溶液中。结果表明,在酸性条件下,两种混合物均发生了严重的变质,从52 MPa和56 MPa到8 MPa和9 MPa (180 d)。然而,与CM相比,OM样品在56、90和180天的残余抗压强度分别高出18%、28%和17%,质量损失更低,分别低于20.5%、68%和51.2%,这与FESEM结果相补充,表明乳胶掺入导致孔隙细化。在硫酸盐和氯化物暴露下,这两种混合物都表现出很高的耐腐蚀性,OM样品在90天的硫酸盐暴露下表现优于CM,与28天的强度和质量增加(90天的峰值为2.24%,56天的峰值为3.1%)相比,质量损失有所增加。然而,在180 d时,OM开始变质,在硫酸盐和氯化物作用下,OM的强度损失(21%和19%)还算合理,但质量损失(1%和0.3%)并不明显。物理观察证实了酸暴露标本的体积变化,而在硫酸盐和氯化物环境下没有变质或显著的体积变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书