{"title":"Durability performance of natural rubber latex and high-volume fly ash incorporation in hybrid fibres concrete under aggressive environments","authors":"Hassaan Bin Tariq, Roszilah Hamid, A.B.M. Amrul Kaish, Shahrizan Baharom, Anis Azmi","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the combined effect of natural rubber latex (NRL) and high-volume fly ash (HVFA) on the durability performance of hybrid fibres concrete. Previous study has shown that incorporating 2.5% NRL and HVFA as cement replacement produces optimum mechanical properties of hybrid fibres concrete mix at 28 days (52 MPa - coded OM), compared to the control mix (56 MPa - coded CM). The specimens were then exposed to sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 5%), sodium sulphate (Na₂SO₄, 5%) and sodium chloride (NaCl, 3%) solutions. Results show that under acidic conditions, both mixes deteriorated severely, from 52 MPa and 56 MPa to 8 MPa and 9 MPa (180 days exposure). However, OM samples showed superior residual compressive strength, that is, higher 18%, 28%, and 17% at 56, 90, and 180 days exposure, respectively, and lower mass loss, less 20.5%, 68%, and 51.2%, compared to CM, complementing FESEM results showing pore refinement due to latex incorporation. Under sulphate and chloride exposures, both mixes show high resistance, with OM samples outperformed CM up to 90 days sulphate exposure, demonstrated through increased strength compared to 28 days strength and mass gain (peak 2.24% at 90 days – sulphate and 3.1% at 56 days - chloride) instead of mass loss. However, at 180 days, OM started to deteriorate, with reasonable strength losses (21% and 19%) but insignificant mass loses (1% and 0.3%) under sulphate and chloride, respectively. Physical observations confirmed volume changes in acid-exposed specimens, whereas no deterioration or significant volume change under sulphate and chloride environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"519 ","pages":"Article 145873"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826007774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the combined effect of natural rubber latex (NRL) and high-volume fly ash (HVFA) on the durability performance of hybrid fibres concrete. Previous study has shown that incorporating 2.5% NRL and HVFA as cement replacement produces optimum mechanical properties of hybrid fibres concrete mix at 28 days (52 MPa - coded OM), compared to the control mix (56 MPa - coded CM). The specimens were then exposed to sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 5%), sodium sulphate (Na₂SO₄, 5%) and sodium chloride (NaCl, 3%) solutions. Results show that under acidic conditions, both mixes deteriorated severely, from 52 MPa and 56 MPa to 8 MPa and 9 MPa (180 days exposure). However, OM samples showed superior residual compressive strength, that is, higher 18%, 28%, and 17% at 56, 90, and 180 days exposure, respectively, and lower mass loss, less 20.5%, 68%, and 51.2%, compared to CM, complementing FESEM results showing pore refinement due to latex incorporation. Under sulphate and chloride exposures, both mixes show high resistance, with OM samples outperformed CM up to 90 days sulphate exposure, demonstrated through increased strength compared to 28 days strength and mass gain (peak 2.24% at 90 days – sulphate and 3.1% at 56 days - chloride) instead of mass loss. However, at 180 days, OM started to deteriorate, with reasonable strength losses (21% and 19%) but insignificant mass loses (1% and 0.3%) under sulphate and chloride, respectively. Physical observations confirmed volume changes in acid-exposed specimens, whereas no deterioration or significant volume change under sulphate and chloride environments.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.