Profiles and transitions of bullying involvement among Chinese elementary school students: School-level predictors and well-being outcomes

IF 4.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101547
Qingna Du , E. Scott Huebner , Lili Tian
{"title":"Profiles and transitions of bullying involvement among Chinese elementary school students: School-level predictors and well-being outcomes","authors":"Qingna Du ,&nbsp;E. Scott Huebner ,&nbsp;Lili Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bullying is a complex social phenomenon and prevalent form of violence in school environments that encompasses various overlapping participant roles, including bullies, victims, and bystanders. The elementary school years are a critical period for the development of bullying involvement. Numerous studies have documented the adverse effects of bullying involvement on students' well-being. However, they have primarily focused on Western populations or adolescent samples, with limited attention given to Chinese elementary school students. Furthermore, due to a predominant reliance on cross-sectional designs, the relations between different profiles and transitions of bullying involvement and key antecedents and outcomes have not been explored fully. By combining person-centered and variable-centered approaches, this study examined the heterogeneous profiles and transitions of bullying involvement, including perpetration, victimization and three types of bystander behaviors (i.e., pro-bullying, passive bystanding, and defending) among Chinese elementary school students, along with their school-level predictors and well-being outcomes. A total of 2510 Chinese elementary school students (54.7% boys, <em>M</em>age = 9.47) participated in self-report assessments on four occasions employing six-month intervals. Five distinct profiles were identified: non-involved; moderate victimization; moderate pro-bullying and passive bystanding; low perpetration, victimization and bystanding; and high perpetration-moderate victimization and bystanding. The non-involved profile revealed the highest stability over time. Students experiencing more psychological maltreatment by teachers and peer relationship problems were at higher risk of bullying involvement. In addition, students who were not involved in bullying reported the highest levels of well-being. These findings underscore the complex and dynamic nature of bullying involvement, highlighting the need for school professionals to provide targeted prevention and intervention strategies in schools taking into account group differences as well as developmental and cultural considerations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 101547"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440526000014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bullying is a complex social phenomenon and prevalent form of violence in school environments that encompasses various overlapping participant roles, including bullies, victims, and bystanders. The elementary school years are a critical period for the development of bullying involvement. Numerous studies have documented the adverse effects of bullying involvement on students' well-being. However, they have primarily focused on Western populations or adolescent samples, with limited attention given to Chinese elementary school students. Furthermore, due to a predominant reliance on cross-sectional designs, the relations between different profiles and transitions of bullying involvement and key antecedents and outcomes have not been explored fully. By combining person-centered and variable-centered approaches, this study examined the heterogeneous profiles and transitions of bullying involvement, including perpetration, victimization and three types of bystander behaviors (i.e., pro-bullying, passive bystanding, and defending) among Chinese elementary school students, along with their school-level predictors and well-being outcomes. A total of 2510 Chinese elementary school students (54.7% boys, Mage = 9.47) participated in self-report assessments on four occasions employing six-month intervals. Five distinct profiles were identified: non-involved; moderate victimization; moderate pro-bullying and passive bystanding; low perpetration, victimization and bystanding; and high perpetration-moderate victimization and bystanding. The non-involved profile revealed the highest stability over time. Students experiencing more psychological maltreatment by teachers and peer relationship problems were at higher risk of bullying involvement. In addition, students who were not involved in bullying reported the highest levels of well-being. These findings underscore the complex and dynamic nature of bullying involvement, highlighting the need for school professionals to provide targeted prevention and intervention strategies in schools taking into account group differences as well as developmental and cultural considerations.
中国小学生恃强凌弱卷入的概况和转变:学校水平的预测因素和幸福感结果
欺凌是一种复杂的社会现象,也是学校环境中普遍存在的暴力形式,它包含了各种重叠的参与者角色,包括欺凌者、受害者和旁观者。小学阶段是霸凌卷入发展的关键时期。许多研究都证明了欺凌行为对学生健康的不利影响。然而,他们主要关注西方人群或青少年样本,对中国小学生的关注有限。此外,由于主要依赖于横截面设计,欺凌参与的不同侧面和转变与关键前因和结果之间的关系尚未得到充分探讨。本研究结合以人为中心和以变量为中心的研究方法,研究了中国小学生恃强凌弱卷入的异质性特征和转变,包括施暴者、受害者和三种旁观者行为(即支持欺凌、被动旁观和防御),以及他们的学校水平预测因素和幸福感结果。共有2510名中国小学生(男生54.7%,Mage = 9.47)参加了4次自述评估,每次评估间隔为6个月。确定了五种不同的概况:未参与;温和的受害;适度支持欺凌和被动旁观;犯罪率、受害率和袖手旁观率低;高犯罪率,中等程度的受害和袖手旁观。随着时间的推移,未涉及的轮廓显示出最高的稳定性。遭受教师心理虐待和同伴关系问题较多的学生参与欺凌的风险较高。此外,没有参与欺凌的学生报告的幸福感水平最高。这些发现强调了欺凌行为的复杂性和动态性,强调学校专业人员需要在考虑群体差异以及发展和文化因素的情况下,在学校提供有针对性的预防和干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书