Validation of Sentinel-2 simplified level 2 prototype (SL2P) processor in retrieving leaf chlorophyll concentration over dusty environment

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Advances in Space Research Pub Date : 2026-03-15 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2026.01.036
Avinash Kumar Ranjan , Bikash Ranjan Parida , Jadunandan Dash , Amit Kumar Gorai
{"title":"Validation of Sentinel-2 simplified level 2 prototype (SL2P) processor in retrieving leaf chlorophyll concentration over dusty environment","authors":"Avinash Kumar Ranjan ,&nbsp;Bikash Ranjan Parida ,&nbsp;Jadunandan Dash ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar Gorai","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2026.01.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reliable information on leaf chlorophyll concentration (LCC) in mining-impacted regions is critical for vegetation assessment and management. However, the presence of foliar dust (FD) significantly alters canopy reflectance, introducing uncertainty in satellite-based chlorophyll estimation. The present study, possibly for the first time, aims to evaluate the performance of the globally trained Sentinel-2 Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor (SL2P) against locally calibrated empirical models and in-situ measurements for estimating LCC in FD-affected mining landscape. Furthermore, this study explores the LCC-FD nexus based on in-situ observations. In-situ LCC measurements were collected using a handheld chlorophyll meter across 40 sites over an industrial region in India. Sentinel-2B spectral bands (surface reflectance) and vegetation indices (VIs) were used to develop empirical models, while SL2P-derived LCC estimates were validated against in-situ measurements. The findings of the study revealed a non-linear FD–LCC relationship, indicating distinct vegetation responses across low, intermediate, and high dust loads. Furthermore, the study evidenced that SL2P consistently underestimates LCC under both dusty and non-dusty conditions, exhibiting substantial negative bias (–8.18 to –14.61 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>) and high uncertainty (RMSE = 10.10–15.09 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>), indicating limited reliability for LCC retrieval. In contrast, several empirical models demonstrated improved performance, particularly under dusty conditions. Band-based models using the red-edge (RE2), red, and near-infrared (NIR) bands achieved low dispersion (MAD ≈ 2.1–3.2 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>) and low relative uncertainty (nRMSE ≈ 7–8%). Among VIs, the Transformed Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI) showed stable performance in dusty environments (MAD ≈ 2.0 µg/cm<sup>2</sup>; nRMSE ≈ 9%), while Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI) and Modified Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index (MCARI) exhibited lower transferability across conditions. These results highlight the limited accuracy of globally trained biophysical algorithms across diverse environments, and advocate for locally calibrated, adaptive models for improved LCC estimation accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"77 6","pages":"Pages 6791-6810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027311772600061X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable information on leaf chlorophyll concentration (LCC) in mining-impacted regions is critical for vegetation assessment and management. However, the presence of foliar dust (FD) significantly alters canopy reflectance, introducing uncertainty in satellite-based chlorophyll estimation. The present study, possibly for the first time, aims to evaluate the performance of the globally trained Sentinel-2 Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor (SL2P) against locally calibrated empirical models and in-situ measurements for estimating LCC in FD-affected mining landscape. Furthermore, this study explores the LCC-FD nexus based on in-situ observations. In-situ LCC measurements were collected using a handheld chlorophyll meter across 40 sites over an industrial region in India. Sentinel-2B spectral bands (surface reflectance) and vegetation indices (VIs) were used to develop empirical models, while SL2P-derived LCC estimates were validated against in-situ measurements. The findings of the study revealed a non-linear FD–LCC relationship, indicating distinct vegetation responses across low, intermediate, and high dust loads. Furthermore, the study evidenced that SL2P consistently underestimates LCC under both dusty and non-dusty conditions, exhibiting substantial negative bias (–8.18 to –14.61 µg/cm2) and high uncertainty (RMSE = 10.10–15.09 µg/cm2), indicating limited reliability for LCC retrieval. In contrast, several empirical models demonstrated improved performance, particularly under dusty conditions. Band-based models using the red-edge (RE2), red, and near-infrared (NIR) bands achieved low dispersion (MAD ≈ 2.1–3.2 µg/cm2) and low relative uncertainty (nRMSE ≈ 7–8%). Among VIs, the Transformed Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI) showed stable performance in dusty environments (MAD ≈ 2.0 µg/cm2; nRMSE ≈ 9%), while Global Environmental Monitoring Index (GEMI) and Modified Chlorophyll Absorption in Reflectance Index (MCARI) exhibited lower transferability across conditions. These results highlight the limited accuracy of globally trained biophysical algorithms across diverse environments, and advocate for locally calibrated, adaptive models for improved LCC estimation accuracy.
Sentinel-2简化2级原型(SL2P)处理器在含尘环境下提取叶片叶绿素浓度的验证
采动区叶片叶绿素浓度(LCC)的可靠信息对植被评价和管理至关重要。然而,叶面尘埃(FD)的存在显著改变了冠层反射率,给基于卫星的叶绿素估算带来了不确定性。本研究可能是第一次,旨在评估全球训练的Sentinel-2简化2级原型处理器(SL2P)与本地校准的经验模型和原位测量的性能,以估计fd影响采矿景观的LCC。此外,本研究还在原位观测的基础上探讨了lc - fd关系。使用手持式叶绿素计在印度一个工业区的40个地点收集了原位LCC测量数据。Sentinel-2B光谱带(地表反射率)和植被指数(VIs)用于建立经验模型,而sl2p衍生的LCC估算值通过现场测量进行验证。研究结果揭示了非线性FD-LCC关系,表明植被在低、中、高沙尘负荷下的响应是不同的。此外,研究表明,在有尘和无尘条件下,SL2P始终低估LCC,表现出显著的负偏差(-8.18至-14.61µg/cm2)和高不确定性(RMSE = 10.10-15.09µg/cm2),表明LCC检索的可靠性有限。相比之下,几个经验模型显示性能有所提高,特别是在多尘条件下。采用红边(RE2)、红光和近红外(NIR)波段的波段模型实现了低色散(MAD≈2.1-3.2µg/cm2)和低相对不确定度(nRMSE≈7-8%)。其中,转化土壤调整植被指数(TSAVI)在多尘环境下表现稳定(MAD≈2.0µg/cm2, nRMSE≈9%),而全球环境监测指数(GEMI)和改良叶绿素吸收反射率指数(MCARI)在不同条件下的可转移性较低。这些结果强调了全球训练的生物物理算法在不同环境下的有限准确性,并提倡使用局部校准的自适应模型来提高LCC估计精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc. NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR). All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书