Kristen Steudel , Nicos Haralabidis , Reed Gurchiek , Jennifer Hicks , Scott Delp
{"title":"Knee and hip joint dynamics differ between sprinting and Nordic hamstring exercises","authors":"Kristen Steudel , Nicos Haralabidis , Reed Gurchiek , Jennifer Hicks , Scott Delp","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2026.113236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sprinting and the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) are common training modalities used to reduce hamstring injury risk, but the differences in the biomechanical demands of sprinting and the NHE are unclear. We conducted an exploratory analysis comparing knee and hip joint kinematics and kinetics, and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) muscle–tendon unit length and velocity during the flight phase of sprinting and the NHE. We collected motion capture and force data from fourteen athletic participants (8 males, 6 females) running (4–8 m/s) and performing the NHE. We used this experimental data and musculoskeletal modeling to compute joint kinematics and kinetics and estimate the BFLH muscle–tendon unit length and velocity for all running speeds and the NHE. Sprinting, for all speeds, puts the BFLH at longer lengths (<em>p</em> < 0.001) and higher lengthening velocities (<em>p</em> < 0.001) than the NHE. The NHE requires participants to generate peak knee flexion moments that are smaller than for running at 6 m/s and above (<em>p</em> < 0.001), and peak negative knee flexion powers that are less than 5% of all running speeds (<em>p</em> < 0.001). However, the duration of each NHE repetition is approximately 60 times longer than the BFLH lengthening portion of the flight phase of running, resulting in greater negative knee work for running at 6 m/s and below (<em>p</em> < 0.001) but less at 7.5 m/s and above (<em>p</em> < 0.001). The results of this study provide necessary quantitative information to compare the biomechanical demands of sprinting and the NHE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 113236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929026000916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sprinting and the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) are common training modalities used to reduce hamstring injury risk, but the differences in the biomechanical demands of sprinting and the NHE are unclear. We conducted an exploratory analysis comparing knee and hip joint kinematics and kinetics, and biceps femoris long head (BFLH) muscle–tendon unit length and velocity during the flight phase of sprinting and the NHE. We collected motion capture and force data from fourteen athletic participants (8 males, 6 females) running (4–8 m/s) and performing the NHE. We used this experimental data and musculoskeletal modeling to compute joint kinematics and kinetics and estimate the BFLH muscle–tendon unit length and velocity for all running speeds and the NHE. Sprinting, for all speeds, puts the BFLH at longer lengths (p < 0.001) and higher lengthening velocities (p < 0.001) than the NHE. The NHE requires participants to generate peak knee flexion moments that are smaller than for running at 6 m/s and above (p < 0.001), and peak negative knee flexion powers that are less than 5% of all running speeds (p < 0.001). However, the duration of each NHE repetition is approximately 60 times longer than the BFLH lengthening portion of the flight phase of running, resulting in greater negative knee work for running at 6 m/s and below (p < 0.001) but less at 7.5 m/s and above (p < 0.001). The results of this study provide necessary quantitative information to compare the biomechanical demands of sprinting and the NHE.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.