Pathways to cost-effective electrochemical CO2 reduction: Role of energy mix, intermittency, and weather conditions in formic acid production

IF 8.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Journal of Power Sources Pub Date : 2026-05-15 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2026.239776
Mohamed B. El Ghrib , Youssef Elaouzy , Jaouad Eddouibi , Houssam Bouaboula , Dawid P. Hanak , Youssef Belmabkhout , Abdelghafour Zaabout
{"title":"Pathways to cost-effective electrochemical CO2 reduction: Role of energy mix, intermittency, and weather conditions in formic acid production","authors":"Mohamed B. El Ghrib ,&nbsp;Youssef Elaouzy ,&nbsp;Jaouad Eddouibi ,&nbsp;Houssam Bouaboula ,&nbsp;Dawid P. Hanak ,&nbsp;Youssef Belmabkhout ,&nbsp;Abdelghafour Zaabout","doi":"10.1016/j.jpowsour.2026.239776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The electrochemical reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to formic acid represents a promising avenue for renewable energy storage and carbon utilization. Its feasibility depends on electricity supply configuration, intermittency, and regional energy characteristics. This study introduces an intermittency-aware, system-level framework that explicitly addresses hourly renewable variability and modular electrolyzer load-following under dynamic power conditions, in contrast to conventional techno-economic assessments that assume a steady-state electricity input. A dynamic model incorporating a three-compartment electrolyzer, downstream separations, and renewable intermittency is developed across four locations with varying weather and grid profiles. Economic and environmental performance is evaluated, including levelized cost of formic acid, net present value, return on investment, CO<sub>2</sub> abatement cost, and global warming intensity under conservative, moderate, and optimistic scenarios across the period 2030-2050. Wind-rich locations enable renewable-only CO<sub>2</sub> electrolysis, achieving levelized formic acid costs of 0.46-0.50 $/kg by 2050, below current market prices, while reaching negative CO<sub>2</sub> abatement costs. Hybrid PV-wind systems approach competitiveness (0.53-0.57 $/kg) without storage, whereas battery integration becomes unfavorable beyond short durations (&gt;4 h). Grid electricity significantly degrades economic and environmental performance, especially under carbon pricing. Overall, CO<sub>2</sub> electrolysis viability is strongly location-dependent and governed by renewable quality, limited storage, and constrained grid use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Power Sources","volume":"674 ","pages":"Article 239776"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Power Sources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775326005264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid represents a promising avenue for renewable energy storage and carbon utilization. Its feasibility depends on electricity supply configuration, intermittency, and regional energy characteristics. This study introduces an intermittency-aware, system-level framework that explicitly addresses hourly renewable variability and modular electrolyzer load-following under dynamic power conditions, in contrast to conventional techno-economic assessments that assume a steady-state electricity input. A dynamic model incorporating a three-compartment electrolyzer, downstream separations, and renewable intermittency is developed across four locations with varying weather and grid profiles. Economic and environmental performance is evaluated, including levelized cost of formic acid, net present value, return on investment, CO2 abatement cost, and global warming intensity under conservative, moderate, and optimistic scenarios across the period 2030-2050. Wind-rich locations enable renewable-only CO2 electrolysis, achieving levelized formic acid costs of 0.46-0.50 $/kg by 2050, below current market prices, while reaching negative CO2 abatement costs. Hybrid PV-wind systems approach competitiveness (0.53-0.57 $/kg) without storage, whereas battery integration becomes unfavorable beyond short durations (>4 h). Grid electricity significantly degrades economic and environmental performance, especially under carbon pricing. Overall, CO2 electrolysis viability is strongly location-dependent and governed by renewable quality, limited storage, and constrained grid use.
具有成本效益的电化学CO2减排途径:能源组合、间歇性和天气条件在甲酸生产中的作用
电化学还原CO2为甲酸代表了可再生能源储存和碳利用的一个有前途的途径。其可行性取决于电力供应配置、间歇性和区域能源特性。本研究引入了一个间歇性感知的系统级框架,该框架明确解决了动态电力条件下每小时可再生能源的可变性和模块化电解槽负载跟踪问题,与传统的技术经济评估相反,该评估假设了稳态电力输入。一个包含三室电解槽、下游分离和可再生间歇性的动态模型在四个不同天气和电网剖面的地点开发。经济和环境绩效评估,包括甲酸平准化成本、净现值、投资回报、二氧化碳减排成本和全球变暖强度在保守、中等和乐观的情景下,从2030年到2050年。风能丰富的地区可以实现纯可再生二氧化碳电解,到2050年,甲酸成本将达到0.46-0.50美元/公斤,低于目前的市场价格,同时二氧化碳减排成本为负。混合光伏-风能系统在没有存储的情况下具有竞争力(0.53-0.57美元/公斤),而电池集成在短时间内(4小时)就变得不利。电网电力显著降低了经济和环境绩效,尤其是在碳定价的情况下。总的来说,二氧化碳电解的可行性与可再生能源的质量、有限的储存和有限的电网使用密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Power Sources
Journal of Power Sources 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1249
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Power Sources is a publication catering to researchers and technologists interested in various aspects of the science, technology, and applications of electrochemical power sources. It covers original research and reviews on primary and secondary batteries, fuel cells, supercapacitors, and photo-electrochemical cells. Topics considered include the research, development and applications of nanomaterials and novel componentry for these devices. Examples of applications of these electrochemical power sources include: • Portable electronics • Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles • Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems • Storage of renewable energy • Satellites and deep space probes • Boats and ships, drones and aircrafts • Wearable energy storage systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书