The state of modelling for evaluating health equity impacts of freight emissions

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2026-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-10-07 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2025.2566679
Zhengtao Qin , Anne Goodchild , Travis Fried , Sarah Dennis-Bauer , Quan Yuan
{"title":"The state of modelling for evaluating health equity impacts of freight emissions","authors":"Zhengtao Qin ,&nbsp;Anne Goodchild ,&nbsp;Travis Fried ,&nbsp;Sarah Dennis-Bauer ,&nbsp;Quan Yuan","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2025.2566679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating health equity impacts of freight emissions is crucial for developing a sustainable and just freight system. It is a complex process that requires interdisciplinary knowledge, including transportation, environment, and public health. Full-chain simulation is an important approach for forecasting freight planning outcomes. However, a systematic framework that integrates available models in full-chain and is specifically designed for the freight sector has not been developed. We review 36 empirical studies covering this interdisciplinary topic, and summarise the commonly used models. We find that EMission FACtor (EMFAC) and Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) models are commonly used to estimate freight vehicle emissions, with their outputs serving as inputs for air quality models, such as Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) or Intervention model for air pollution (InMAP). To estimate the health effects, concentration-response (C-R) functions, combined with static or dynamic demographic and socioeconomic data, are used to quantify the relationship between changes in pollutant concentrations and health outcomes. Then, disparity analysis relies on the assumption of age-specific C-R functions and examines statistical differences between demographic groups – including racial/ethnic groups, income levels, age groups, and other vulnerable communities. This study comprehensively outlines this state-of-the-art, integrated framework identified through the synthesis of this interdisciplinary literature. This framework can support future researchers in this field and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"46 2","pages":"Pages 223-247"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S014416472500042X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating health equity impacts of freight emissions is crucial for developing a sustainable and just freight system. It is a complex process that requires interdisciplinary knowledge, including transportation, environment, and public health. Full-chain simulation is an important approach for forecasting freight planning outcomes. However, a systematic framework that integrates available models in full-chain and is specifically designed for the freight sector has not been developed. We review 36 empirical studies covering this interdisciplinary topic, and summarise the commonly used models. We find that EMission FACtor (EMFAC) and Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) models are commonly used to estimate freight vehicle emissions, with their outputs serving as inputs for air quality models, such as Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) or Intervention model for air pollution (InMAP). To estimate the health effects, concentration-response (C-R) functions, combined with static or dynamic demographic and socioeconomic data, are used to quantify the relationship between changes in pollutant concentrations and health outcomes. Then, disparity analysis relies on the assumption of age-specific C-R functions and examines statistical differences between demographic groups – including racial/ethnic groups, income levels, age groups, and other vulnerable communities. This study comprehensively outlines this state-of-the-art, integrated framework identified through the synthesis of this interdisciplinary literature. This framework can support future researchers in this field and policymakers.
评估货运排放对健康公平影响的建模现状
评估货运排放对健康公平的影响对于发展可持续和公正的货运系统至关重要。这是一个复杂的过程,需要跨学科的知识,包括交通、环境和公共卫生。全链仿真是预测货运规划结果的重要手段。然而,目前还没有一个系统的框架,将现有的模型集成到全链中,并专门为货运部门设计。我们回顾了涵盖这一跨学科主题的36项实证研究,并总结了常用的模型。我们发现排放因子(EMFAC)和机动车排放模拟器(MOVES)模型通常用于估计货运车辆的排放,它们的输出作为空气质量模型的输入,如社区多尺度空气质量模型(CMAQ)或空气污染干预模型(InMAP)。为了估计对健康的影响,浓度-响应(C-R)函数结合静态或动态人口统计和社会经济数据,用于量化污染物浓度变化与健康结果之间的关系。然后,差异分析依赖于年龄特定C-R函数的假设,并检查人口群体之间的统计差异——包括种族/民族群体、收入水平、年龄群体和其他弱势群体。本研究通过跨学科文献的综合,全面概述了这一最先进的综合框架。这个框架可以支持未来该领域的研究人员和政策制定者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书