Steering through uncertainty: a systematic review of liability communication in autonomous vehicles

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2026-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-10-11 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2025.2571959
Tugra Akarsu , Paurav Shukla , Peter Winter , Daria Onitiu , Mohammad Naiseh , Elena Nichele , Justyna Lisinska , Richard Hyde
{"title":"Steering through uncertainty: a systematic review of liability communication in autonomous vehicles","authors":"Tugra Akarsu ,&nbsp;Paurav Shukla ,&nbsp;Peter Winter ,&nbsp;Daria Onitiu ,&nbsp;Mohammad Naiseh ,&nbsp;Elena Nichele ,&nbsp;Justyna Lisinska ,&nbsp;Richard Hyde","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2025.2571959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous vehicles (AVs) represent a potential technological transformation of transportation systems, however, incidents involving them have highlighted the complex challenge of assigning liability. While a growing body of literature addresses legal and technical liability, the <em>communication</em> of liability – how legal, moral, or financial responsibility for adverse outcomes is conveyed among stakeholders such as manufacturers, users, insurers and policymakers – remains a critical gap. This multidisciplinary systematic literature review analyzes 90 academic articles published between 2015 and 2024 across a range of disciplines to map the current state of liability communication. Specifically, it examines how liability is communicated: who or what is held accountable for potential harms, under what conditions and through what mechanisms. We find that liability communication is often reactive, inconsistent and poorly aligned with public understanding. Despite the development of expert legal and technical frameworks, communication practices frequently fail to bridge the gap between expert discourse and end-user comprehension. The analysis is organised across five key themes: governance challenges; safety concerns; ownership models; cross-country comparisons; and future AV deployment. Across all five, communication failures are consistently linked to ambiguous terminology and the absence of proactive, standardised protocols. Together, these themes contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how liability is communicated within the evolving AV ecosystem. They also highlight an urgent need for updated policies and more effective, stakeholder-oriented communication strategies. In response, this study offers a necessary reframing of the problem – calling for the development of stakeholder-centric communication practices capable of functioning even amid legal uncertainty. Addressing these challenges is essential not only for effective AV integration but also for ensuring that this transformation unfolds safely and equitably.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"46 2","pages":"Pages 270-296"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164725000443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) represent a potential technological transformation of transportation systems, however, incidents involving them have highlighted the complex challenge of assigning liability. While a growing body of literature addresses legal and technical liability, the communication of liability – how legal, moral, or financial responsibility for adverse outcomes is conveyed among stakeholders such as manufacturers, users, insurers and policymakers – remains a critical gap. This multidisciplinary systematic literature review analyzes 90 academic articles published between 2015 and 2024 across a range of disciplines to map the current state of liability communication. Specifically, it examines how liability is communicated: who or what is held accountable for potential harms, under what conditions and through what mechanisms. We find that liability communication is often reactive, inconsistent and poorly aligned with public understanding. Despite the development of expert legal and technical frameworks, communication practices frequently fail to bridge the gap between expert discourse and end-user comprehension. The analysis is organised across five key themes: governance challenges; safety concerns; ownership models; cross-country comparisons; and future AV deployment. Across all five, communication failures are consistently linked to ambiguous terminology and the absence of proactive, standardised protocols. Together, these themes contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how liability is communicated within the evolving AV ecosystem. They also highlight an urgent need for updated policies and more effective, stakeholder-oriented communication strategies. In response, this study offers a necessary reframing of the problem – calling for the development of stakeholder-centric communication practices capable of functioning even amid legal uncertainty. Addressing these challenges is essential not only for effective AV integration but also for ensuring that this transformation unfolds safely and equitably.
驾驭不确定性:对自动驾驶汽车责任沟通的系统回顾
自动驾驶汽车代表了交通运输系统的潜在技术变革,然而,涉及自动驾驶汽车的事故凸显了责任分配的复杂挑战。虽然越来越多的文献涉及法律和技术责任,但责任的沟通——不利后果的法律、道德或财务责任如何在制造商、用户、保险公司和政策制定者等利益相关者之间传达——仍然是一个关键的空白。这份多学科系统的文献综述分析了2015年至2024年间在一系列学科中发表的90篇学术文章,以描绘责任沟通的现状。具体来说,它审查了责任是如何传达的:谁或什么对潜在的危害负责,在什么条件下,通过什么机制。我们发现责任沟通往往是被动的,不一致的,与公众的理解不一致。尽管发展了专家法律和技术框架,但交流实践往往无法弥合专家话语与最终用户理解之间的差距。该分析围绕五个关键主题展开:治理挑战;安全问题;所有权模型;越野比较;以及未来的自动驾驶部署。在这五个国家中,通信失败始终与模棱两可的术语和缺乏主动的、标准化的协议有关。总之,这些主题有助于更细致地了解在不断发展的自动驾驶生态系统中责任是如何传达的。他们还强调迫切需要更新政策和更有效的、面向利益攸关方的传播战略。作为回应,本研究提供了一个必要的问题重构-呼吁发展以利益相关者为中心的沟通实践,即使在法律不确定的情况下也能发挥作用。解决这些挑战不仅对于自动驾驶汽车的有效整合至关重要,而且对于确保这种转变安全、公平地展开也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书