SDGs and living wages: Can global goals steer private sector sustainability?

IF 4.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2025.100308
Elizabeth A. Bennett
{"title":"SDGs and living wages: Can global goals steer private sector sustainability?","authors":"Elizabeth A. Bennett","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2025.100308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global goals are theorized to catalyze non-state actors' existing strategies and practices to promote sustainable development. This research examines whether and how the 2015 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) catalyzed the Global Movement for Voluntary Living Wages (GMVLW). The GMVLW encourages and empowers companies to voluntarily pay workers enough to meet their basic needs and save for emergencies. This “living wage” is, in most countries, above the legal minimum wage. The article first offers an original theoretical framework of seven types of steering effects: discursive, normative, institutional, relational, resource, problem-solving, and progress. This framework draws on, consolidates, and expands on existing research. It then draws on coded fieldnotes from 46 interviews and 54 events related to GMVLW to describe how the movement changed from 2004 to 2024, and to assess whether these changes correlate with the SDGs and how the SDGs may have steered them. This research finds that the SDGs quickly led several national development organizations and a few corporations to prioritize living wages. This support appears to have greatly accelerated the GMVLW. Most significantly, it seems to have enhanced the movement's capacity to solve problems related to living wage implementation, such as developing widely accepted methodologies and freely available estimates. At the same time, the SDGs do not appear to have steered the movement toward significant <em>progress</em>, as defined by the number of workers currently earning a living wage. New due diligence legislation and emerging ESG (environmental, social, governance) norms also appear to have supported progress in the GMVLW.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811625000746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global goals are theorized to catalyze non-state actors' existing strategies and practices to promote sustainable development. This research examines whether and how the 2015 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) catalyzed the Global Movement for Voluntary Living Wages (GMVLW). The GMVLW encourages and empowers companies to voluntarily pay workers enough to meet their basic needs and save for emergencies. This “living wage” is, in most countries, above the legal minimum wage. The article first offers an original theoretical framework of seven types of steering effects: discursive, normative, institutional, relational, resource, problem-solving, and progress. This framework draws on, consolidates, and expands on existing research. It then draws on coded fieldnotes from 46 interviews and 54 events related to GMVLW to describe how the movement changed from 2004 to 2024, and to assess whether these changes correlate with the SDGs and how the SDGs may have steered them. This research finds that the SDGs quickly led several national development organizations and a few corporations to prioritize living wages. This support appears to have greatly accelerated the GMVLW. Most significantly, it seems to have enhanced the movement's capacity to solve problems related to living wage implementation, such as developing widely accepted methodologies and freely available estimates. At the same time, the SDGs do not appear to have steered the movement toward significant progress, as defined by the number of workers currently earning a living wage. New due diligence legislation and emerging ESG (environmental, social, governance) norms also appear to have supported progress in the GMVLW.
可持续发展目标与生活工资:全球目标能否引导私营部门的可持续性?
全球目标是理论上催化非国家行为体的现有战略和实践,以促进可持续发展。本研究探讨了2015年联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)是否以及如何促进了全球自愿生活工资运动(GMVLW)。GMVLW鼓励并授权公司自愿向工人支付足够的工资,以满足他们的基本需求,并为紧急情况储蓄。在大多数国家,这个“生活工资”高于法定最低工资。本文首先提出了话语型、规范型、制度型、关系型、资源型、问题解决型和进步型七种导向效应的理论框架。该框架借鉴、巩固并扩展了现有的研究。然后,它从46个访谈和54个与GMVLW相关的事件中提取了编码的现场笔记,以描述该运动从2004年到2024年的变化,并评估这些变化是否与可持续发展目标相关,以及可持续发展目标如何引导它们。这项研究发现,可持续发展目标迅速导致一些国家发展组织和一些公司优先考虑生活工资。这种支持似乎大大加速了GMVLW的发展。最重要的是,它似乎增强了该运动解决与生活工资执行有关的问题的能力,例如制定广泛接受的方法和免费提供的估计数。与此同时,可持续发展目标似乎并没有引导这一运动取得重大进展,这是由目前获得生活工资的工人数量来定义的。新的尽职调查立法和新兴的ESG(环境、社会、治理)规范似乎也支持了GMVLW的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书