Unpacking adaptation lock-ins: Explaining the persistence of the adaptation gap

IF 4.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2026.100320
Nicolas W. Jager , Meghan Alexander , Lisanne Groen , Dave Huitema , Bernd Siebenhüner , Julie P. King , John Turnpenny , Tim Rayner , Jean Hugé , Torsten Grothmann
{"title":"Unpacking adaptation lock-ins: Explaining the persistence of the adaptation gap","authors":"Nicolas W. Jager ,&nbsp;Meghan Alexander ,&nbsp;Lisanne Groen ,&nbsp;Dave Huitema ,&nbsp;Bernd Siebenhüner ,&nbsp;Julie P. King ,&nbsp;John Turnpenny ,&nbsp;Tim Rayner ,&nbsp;Jean Hugé ,&nbsp;Torsten Grothmann","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2026.100320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change adaptation is increasingly outpaced by accelerating climate risks, resulting in a persistent and widening adaptation gap. Many current interventions remain incremental and insufficient, failing to address the scale of transformation required. We argue that this shortfall is best understood through the concept of adaptation lock-ins—systemic constraints that both cause and result from maladaptation. These lock-ins generate self-reinforcing dynamics that trap institutions and policy systems in established trajectories, hindering more ambitious and forward-looking action. In this paper, we explore how a deeper understanding of lock-ins can help explain enduring adaptation deficits and structural barriers to sustainable change. We also discuss methodological approaches to identifying lock-in mechanisms and show how such insights can be mobilized to inform deliberate ‘unlocking’ strategies that enable more equitable and transformative adaptation pathways and sustainability transformations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811626000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change adaptation is increasingly outpaced by accelerating climate risks, resulting in a persistent and widening adaptation gap. Many current interventions remain incremental and insufficient, failing to address the scale of transformation required. We argue that this shortfall is best understood through the concept of adaptation lock-ins—systemic constraints that both cause and result from maladaptation. These lock-ins generate self-reinforcing dynamics that trap institutions and policy systems in established trajectories, hindering more ambitious and forward-looking action. In this paper, we explore how a deeper understanding of lock-ins can help explain enduring adaptation deficits and structural barriers to sustainable change. We also discuss methodological approaches to identifying lock-in mechanisms and show how such insights can be mobilized to inform deliberate ‘unlocking’ strategies that enable more equitable and transformative adaptation pathways and sustainability transformations.
拆解适应锁定:解释适应差距的持久性
气候变化适应日益被加速的气候风险超越,导致适应差距持续存在并不断扩大。目前的许多干预措施仍然是渐进的和不充分的,未能解决所需的转型规模。我们认为,最好通过适应锁定的概念来理解这种不足,适应锁定是导致和导致适应不良的系统约束。这些锁定产生了自我强化的动力,使机构和政策体系陷入既定轨道,阻碍了更有雄心和前瞻性的行动。在本文中,我们探讨了如何更深入地理解锁定有助于解释持久的适应缺陷和可持续变化的结构性障碍。我们还讨论了确定锁定机制的方法方法,并展示了如何利用这些见解为深思熟虑的“解锁”战略提供信息,从而实现更公平、更具变革性的适应途径和可持续性转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书