Contrasting biophysical impacts of vegetation growth and type transition greening on local temperature in Southwestern China

IF 5.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Advances in Climate Change Research Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.accre.2025.10.010
Na Dong , Zhen Liu , Ru Xu , Hua-Bing Huang
{"title":"Contrasting biophysical impacts of vegetation growth and type transition greening on local temperature in Southwestern China","authors":"Na Dong ,&nbsp;Zhen Liu ,&nbsp;Ru Xu ,&nbsp;Hua-Bing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.accre.2025.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is a noticeable greening trend observed in China over the first two decades of the 21st century attributed to both vegetation growth and type transition. However, the comparative impacts of these two greening on local climate and their associated biophysical mechanism have not been well appreciated, which is essential and beneficial for the development of regional ecological programs and climate mitigation. This study disentangles the influences of vegetation growth and type transitions on land surface temperature (LST) in southwestern China, employing a space-for-time approach utilizing satellite images from 2002–2022. Findings indicate that type transitions yield a more pronounced LST cooling, reaching 2–3 times that of vegetation growth. Leaf area index (LAI) induced cooling is the highest in cropland to grassland transition, with a remarkable decrease of −0.058 ± 0.049 K, while the greatest cooling in vegetation growth is in grassland growth, achieving −0.031 ± 0.033 K. The highest LST sensitivity for type transitions is in Guangxi at −1.49 ± 0.52 K, whereas for vegetation growth is in Guizhou at −1.11 ± 0.28 K. Both types of greening exhibit cooling impacts predominantly driven by evapotranspiration, offsetting the albedo warming effect. Additionally, both albedo and LST sensitivities gradually decay with the increasing of greening degree to higher LAI saturation. This highlights both vegetation growth and type transitions contribute to local cooling with different intensity and effectiveness across vegetation types and regions. It is critical to consider their distinctions comprehensively and individually when formulating regional ecological programs and climate mitigation measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48628,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Climate Change Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"Pages 175-188"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Climate Change Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927825002321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a noticeable greening trend observed in China over the first two decades of the 21st century attributed to both vegetation growth and type transition. However, the comparative impacts of these two greening on local climate and their associated biophysical mechanism have not been well appreciated, which is essential and beneficial for the development of regional ecological programs and climate mitigation. This study disentangles the influences of vegetation growth and type transitions on land surface temperature (LST) in southwestern China, employing a space-for-time approach utilizing satellite images from 2002–2022. Findings indicate that type transitions yield a more pronounced LST cooling, reaching 2–3 times that of vegetation growth. Leaf area index (LAI) induced cooling is the highest in cropland to grassland transition, with a remarkable decrease of −0.058 ± 0.049 K, while the greatest cooling in vegetation growth is in grassland growth, achieving −0.031 ± 0.033 K. The highest LST sensitivity for type transitions is in Guangxi at −1.49 ± 0.52 K, whereas for vegetation growth is in Guizhou at −1.11 ± 0.28 K. Both types of greening exhibit cooling impacts predominantly driven by evapotranspiration, offsetting the albedo warming effect. Additionally, both albedo and LST sensitivities gradually decay with the increasing of greening degree to higher LAI saturation. This highlights both vegetation growth and type transitions contribute to local cooling with different intensity and effectiveness across vegetation types and regions. It is critical to consider their distinctions comprehensively and individually when formulating regional ecological programs and climate mitigation measures.
西南地区植被生长和类型转换绿化对局地温度的生物物理影响对比
在21世纪的前20年,由于植被的生长和类型的转变,中国出现了明显的绿化趋势。然而,两种绿化对当地气候的比较影响及其相关的生物物理机制尚未得到很好的认识,这对区域生态规划的发展和气候减缓至关重要。利用2002-2022年的卫星影像,采用时空分析方法,研究了中国西南地区植被生长和类型转换对地表温度的影响。研究结果表明,类型转变会产生更明显的地表温度冷却,达到植被生长的2-3倍。叶面积指数(LAI)诱导的降温在农田向草地过渡时最大,减少幅度为- 0.058±0.049 K,而植被生长过程中降温幅度最大的是草地生长,达到- 0.031±0.033 K。广西对类型转换的地表温度敏感度最高,为- 1.49±0.52 K,而贵州对植被生长的地表温度敏感度最高,为- 1.11±0.28 K。两种绿化都表现出主要由蒸散发驱动的降温效应,抵消了反照率增温效应。反照率和地表温度敏感性随绿化程度的增加而逐渐衰减,LAI饱和度越高。这凸显了植被生长和类型转换对局部降温的贡献,在不同的植被类型和区域具有不同的强度和有效性。在制定区域生态规划和气候减缓措施时,综合和单独考虑它们之间的差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Climate Change Research
Advances in Climate Change Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
424
审稿时长
107 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Climate Change Research publishes scientific research and analyses on climate change and the interactions of climate change with society. This journal encompasses basic science and economic, social, and policy research, including studies on mitigation and adaptation to climate change. Advances in Climate Change Research attempts to promote research in climate change and provide an impetus for the application of research achievements in numerous aspects, such as socioeconomic sustainable development, responses to the adaptation and mitigation of climate change, diplomatic negotiations of climate and environment policies, and the protection and exploitation of natural resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书