The neural time course of self-oriented pointing and labeling in visual processing

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Brain and Language Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2026.105724
Spencer D. Kelly, Dylan Vlasak, Binghui Tang
{"title":"The neural time course of self-oriented pointing and labeling in visual processing","authors":"Spencer D. Kelly,&nbsp;Dylan Vlasak,&nbsp;Binghui Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2026.105724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pointing and labeling are traditionally seen as communicative behaviors; the present study examines their neurocognitive consequences when produced for oneself. Twenty-four participants completed a priming task in which they encoded a color prime in three within-subjects conditions: point, label, and point &amp; label. Following each prime, participants judged whether a target object belonged to the same (congruent) or different (incongruent) color category. Target-locked ERPs showed effects of congruence and encoding conditions spanning early and later processing stages. At early latencies, pointing elicited a more positive posterior P1 than labeling, while the combined point &amp; label condition was intermediate and did not differ reliably from either unimodal condition, consistent with a non-additive interaction at early perceptual-attentional stages. At later latencies, pointing alone elicited a larger posterior P2 and smaller central-parietal late negativity (300–500 ms) than labeling alone, and the combined condition diverged from pointing while closely paralleling labeling. Together, these results indicate that pointing and labeling for oneself exert distinct, non-additive influences on downstream object processing, with early processing showing graded interaction and later perceptual and conceptual processing increasingly influenced by labeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55330,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Language","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 105724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X26000192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pointing and labeling are traditionally seen as communicative behaviors; the present study examines their neurocognitive consequences when produced for oneself. Twenty-four participants completed a priming task in which they encoded a color prime in three within-subjects conditions: point, label, and point & label. Following each prime, participants judged whether a target object belonged to the same (congruent) or different (incongruent) color category. Target-locked ERPs showed effects of congruence and encoding conditions spanning early and later processing stages. At early latencies, pointing elicited a more positive posterior P1 than labeling, while the combined point & label condition was intermediate and did not differ reliably from either unimodal condition, consistent with a non-additive interaction at early perceptual-attentional stages. At later latencies, pointing alone elicited a larger posterior P2 and smaller central-parietal late negativity (300–500 ms) than labeling alone, and the combined condition diverged from pointing while closely paralleling labeling. Together, these results indicate that pointing and labeling for oneself exert distinct, non-additive influences on downstream object processing, with early processing showing graded interaction and later perceptual and conceptual processing increasingly influenced by labeling.
视觉加工中自我定向指向和标记的神经时间过程
指指点点和贴标签传统上被视为沟通行为;本研究考察了它们对自己产生的神经认知后果。24名参与者完成了一项启动任务,他们在三种受试者条件下编码颜色启动:点、标签和点&标签。在每个启动后,参与者判断目标物体是否属于相同(一致)或不同(不一致)的颜色类别。目标锁定的erp在加工的早期和后期表现出一致性和编码条件的影响。在早期潜伏期,指向比标记诱发了更积极的后验P1,而组合点和标签条件是中间的,与任何单峰条件都没有可靠的差异,与早期感知-注意阶段的非加性相互作用一致。在较晚的潜伏期,与单独标记相比,单独指向诱发了更大的后P2和更小的中央-顶叶晚期负性(300-500 ms),并且在密切平行标记时,联合状态偏离了指向。综上所述,这些结果表明,指向和自我标记对下游的客体加工具有明显的非加性影响,早期的客体加工表现出渐变的相互作用,而后期的知觉和概念加工则越来越受标记的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain and Language
Brain and Language 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
20.5 weeks
期刊介绍: An interdisciplinary journal, Brain and Language publishes articles that elucidate the complex relationships among language, brain, and behavior. The journal covers the large variety of modern techniques in cognitive neuroscience, including functional and structural brain imaging, electrophysiology, cellular and molecular neurobiology, genetics, lesion-based approaches, and computational modeling. All articles must relate to human language and be relevant to the understanding of its neurobiological and neurocognitive bases. Published articles in the journal are expected to have significant theoretical novelty and/or practical implications, and use perspectives and methods from psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience along with brain data and brain measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书