Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics: a 6-year evaluation of guideline adherence and stewardship impact in a Ukrainian maternity hospital

IF 1.9 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100515
O. Pechak , K. Bielka , M. Frank , H. Fomina , D. Yevstifeiev , L. Yanitska
{"title":"Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics: a 6-year evaluation of guideline adherence and stewardship impact in a Ukrainian maternity hospital","authors":"O. Pechak ,&nbsp;K. Bielka ,&nbsp;M. Frank ,&nbsp;H. Fomina ,&nbsp;D. Yevstifeiev ,&nbsp;L. Yanitska","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2026.100515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Surgical-site infections are a major concern in obstetric surgery. In Ukraine, evolving national guidelines and institutional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives have sought to optimize peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), but their impact on clinical outcomes requires rigorous evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2018–2023) of 474 obstetric surgeries to evaluate changes in PAP adherence and its association with length of stay (LOS). Adherence was assessed using a 3-point compliance score (timing, choice, and duration). The association between compliance and time to discharge was analysed using a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards model.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A marked improvement in practice was observed; full compliance increased from 11% to 71%, while mean LOS decreased from 9.9 to 4.7 days. Component analysis showed that structural interventions eliminated duration errors, while errors in antibiotic choice persisted. In the multi-variable model, the ‘year of surgery’ was the strongest predictor of earlier discharge (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), acting as a proxy for holistic systemic improvements. While the compliance score was not an independent predictor in the overall cohort, binary compliance showed a trend towards significance (<em>P</em> = 0.098), remaining statistically subordinate to secular trends. A significant association was found only in the highly standardized laparoscopy subgroup, suggesting the impact of protocol adherence is most visible in predictable clinical environments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multi-faceted AMS programs can successfully optimize PAP adherence and improve outcomes. While the overall reduction in LOS is driven by broad improvements over time, specific guideline adherence remains a crucial quality indicator, particularly for standardized procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088926000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgical-site infections are a major concern in obstetric surgery. In Ukraine, evolving national guidelines and institutional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives have sought to optimize peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), but their impact on clinical outcomes requires rigorous evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2018–2023) of 474 obstetric surgeries to evaluate changes in PAP adherence and its association with length of stay (LOS). Adherence was assessed using a 3-point compliance score (timing, choice, and duration). The association between compliance and time to discharge was analysed using a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards model.

Findings

A marked improvement in practice was observed; full compliance increased from 11% to 71%, while mean LOS decreased from 9.9 to 4.7 days. Component analysis showed that structural interventions eliminated duration errors, while errors in antibiotic choice persisted. In the multi-variable model, the ‘year of surgery’ was the strongest predictor of earlier discharge (P < 0.001), acting as a proxy for holistic systemic improvements. While the compliance score was not an independent predictor in the overall cohort, binary compliance showed a trend towards significance (P = 0.098), remaining statistically subordinate to secular trends. A significant association was found only in the highly standardized laparoscopy subgroup, suggesting the impact of protocol adherence is most visible in predictable clinical environments.

Conclusion

Multi-faceted AMS programs can successfully optimize PAP adherence and improve outcomes. While the overall reduction in LOS is driven by broad improvements over time, specific guideline adherence remains a crucial quality indicator, particularly for standardized procedures.
产科围手术期抗生素预防:乌克兰一家妇产医院指南依从性和管理影响的6年评估
手术部位感染是产科外科的一个主要问题。在乌克兰,不断发展的国家指南和机构抗菌素管理(AMS)举措力求优化围手术期抗生素预防(PAP),但其对临床结果的影响需要严格评估。方法对474例产科手术进行回顾性队列研究(2018-2023),以评估PAP依从性的变化及其与住院时间(LOS)的关系。依从性采用3分依从性评分(时间、选择和持续时间)进行评估。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型分析依从性与出院时间之间的关系。在实践中观察到明显的改善;完全依从性从11%增加到71%,而平均LOS从9.9天减少到4.7天。成分分析表明,结构性干预消除了持续时间错误,而抗生素选择的错误仍然存在。在多变量模型中,“手术年份”是早期出院的最强预测因子(P < 0.001),作为整体系统改善的代理。虽然依从性评分在整个队列中不是一个独立的预测因子,但二元依从性显示出显著的趋势(P = 0.098),在统计上仍然服从于长期趋势。只有在高度标准化的腹腔镜亚组中发现了显著的关联,这表明方案依从性的影响在可预测的临床环境中最为明显。结论多方面的辅助医疗方案可以优化PAP的依从性,提高疗效。虽然随着时间的推移,LOS的总体减少是由广泛的改进所驱动的,但具体的指南遵守仍然是一个关键的质量指标,特别是对于标准化程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书