Experimental and analytical evaluation of crumb rubber concrete with multi-blended industrial waste aggregate and SCMs: Strength, durability, microstructure, and ML prediction

IF 8.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Subham Mishra , Swetapadma Panda , Debashis Bhowmik , Sayantan Guha
{"title":"Experimental and analytical evaluation of crumb rubber concrete with multi-blended industrial waste aggregate and SCMs: Strength, durability, microstructure, and ML prediction","authors":"Subham Mishra ,&nbsp;Swetapadma Panda ,&nbsp;Debashis Bhowmik ,&nbsp;Sayantan Guha","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rubberized concrete offers notable environmental benefits through waste tire utilization; however, its application is constrained by comparatively low mechanical strength. The addition of suitable industrial waste materials may offer a viable strategy to offset the strength reduction and improve the structural performance of rubberized concrete. Consequently, researchers are investigating supplemental cementitious materials (SCMs) as alternatives to conventional binders and industrial waste materials as substitutes for fine aggregates in the construction industry. This study proposes a framework to improve the properties of blended crumb rubber concrete (BCRC) incorporating industrial by-products such as copper slag (CS) and steel slag (SS) as fine aggregates, along with silica fume (SF) and rice husk ash (RHA) as SCMs. Four types of BCRC mixes were investigated for fresh concrete properties, mechanical properties through compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths, as well as durability indicators like alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT). Out of all mixes, BCRC4 (20 %CR+20 %SF+10 %RHA+20 %CS+10 %SS) shows the 54 % improved strength and durability properties that resulted from balanced use of SCMs and industrial waste materials. However, predicting the compressive strength of BCRC remains complex due to its heterogeneous composition and age-dependent behavior. To address this, seven widely used machine-learning techniques were employed to estimate compressive strength at advanced curing ages, including linear regression, decision tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and Lloyd’s algorithm (K-means clustering). Model performance was evaluated using regression analysis and statistical indicators. Among the models, linear regression demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an R² value of 0.94 with the lowest mean squared error (0.39) and mean absolute error (0.48). Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was conducted for the optimal BCRC4 mix to interpret the contribution of individual input variables, providing valuable insights into the influence of alternative fine aggregates and SCMs on compressive strength development with curing age.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"516 ","pages":"Article 145677"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061826005787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rubberized concrete offers notable environmental benefits through waste tire utilization; however, its application is constrained by comparatively low mechanical strength. The addition of suitable industrial waste materials may offer a viable strategy to offset the strength reduction and improve the structural performance of rubberized concrete. Consequently, researchers are investigating supplemental cementitious materials (SCMs) as alternatives to conventional binders and industrial waste materials as substitutes for fine aggregates in the construction industry. This study proposes a framework to improve the properties of blended crumb rubber concrete (BCRC) incorporating industrial by-products such as copper slag (CS) and steel slag (SS) as fine aggregates, along with silica fume (SF) and rice husk ash (RHA) as SCMs. Four types of BCRC mixes were investigated for fresh concrete properties, mechanical properties through compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths, as well as durability indicators like alkali–silica reaction (ASR) and rapid chloride penetration test (RCPT). Out of all mixes, BCRC4 (20 %CR+20 %SF+10 %RHA+20 %CS+10 %SS) shows the 54 % improved strength and durability properties that resulted from balanced use of SCMs and industrial waste materials. However, predicting the compressive strength of BCRC remains complex due to its heterogeneous composition and age-dependent behavior. To address this, seven widely used machine-learning techniques were employed to estimate compressive strength at advanced curing ages, including linear regression, decision tree, random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and Lloyd’s algorithm (K-means clustering). Model performance was evaluated using regression analysis and statistical indicators. Among the models, linear regression demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, achieving an R² value of 0.94 with the lowest mean squared error (0.39) and mean absolute error (0.48). Furthermore, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was conducted for the optimal BCRC4 mix to interpret the contribution of individual input variables, providing valuable insights into the influence of alternative fine aggregates and SCMs on compressive strength development with curing age.
工业废骨料与SCMs混合橡胶颗粒混凝土的试验与分析评价:强度、耐久性、微观结构和ML预测
橡胶混凝土通过对废旧轮胎的利用,具有显著的环境效益;但其机械强度较低,制约了其应用。添加合适的工业废料可以提供一个可行的策略,以抵消强度降低,提高橡胶混凝土的结构性能。因此,研究人员正在研究补充胶凝材料(SCMs)作为传统粘合剂的替代品和工业废料作为建筑行业细骨料的替代品。本研究提出了一个框架来改善混合橡胶屑混凝土(BCRC)的性能,该混凝土采用工业副产品,如铜渣(CS)和钢渣(SS)作为细骨料,以及硅灰(SF)和稻壳灰(RHA)作为细骨料。研究了四种BCRC混合料的新拌混凝土性能、抗压、劈裂拉伸和抗弯强度的力学性能,以及碱-硅反应(ASR)和快速氯化物渗透试验(RCPT)等耐久性指标。在所有混合料中,BCRC4(20 %CR+20 %SF+10 %RHA+20 %CS+10 %SS)显示出54 %的强度和耐久性提高,这是由于平衡使用scm和工业废料。然而,预测BCRC的抗压强度仍然很复杂,因为它的异质性组成和年龄依赖性行为。为了解决这个问题,研究人员采用了7种广泛使用的机器学习技术来估计高龄养护时的抗压强度,包括线性回归、决策树、随机森林、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、支持向量机(SVM)和劳埃德算法(K-means聚类)。采用回归分析和统计指标对模型性能进行评价。其中,线性回归模型的预测精度最高,R²值为0.94,均方误差(0.39)和平均绝对误差(0.48)最低。此外,对最佳BCRC4混合料进行了SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)分析,以解释各个输入变量的贡献,为细骨料和细颗粒对抗压强度随养护龄期发展的影响提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书