How do workers decide to work safely? Mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Safety Science Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107144
Yang Liu , Gui Ye , Qingting Xiang , Sen Wang
{"title":"How do workers decide to work safely? Mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure","authors":"Yang Liu ,&nbsp;Gui Ye ,&nbsp;Qingting Xiang ,&nbsp;Sen Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Occupational safety decision-making failures among employees represent a fundamental challenge for organizations, as such failures are<!--> <!-->a significant factor<!--> <!-->in unsafe behaviors and accidents. However, the specific causes of occupational safety decision-making failure remain inadequately understood. To address this research gap, this study explores the mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure from the perspective of the matching degree between safety decision-making capability and task demands. Drawing on the task-capability interface model and resource limitation theory, this study proposes that a U-shaped relationship between the matching degree of safety decision-making capability and task demands, and safety decision-making failure. Through an experimental vignette study involving 252 industry employees and hierarchical regression analysis, the study validates the proposed model. The results indicate that the impact of the matching degree between safety decision-making capability and task demands on safety decision-making failure is U-shaped. Additionally, optimism bias moderates this U-shaped relationship. Theoretically, this study is the first to propose and validate the U-shaped impact of safety decision-making capability-task demand matching degree on safety decision-making failure. This finding not only deepens the understanding of the potential mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure but also contributes to the development of the task-capability interface model. Practically, the study emphasizes the importance of dynamically balancing safety decision-making capability and task demands. Organizations should not only prevent risks arising from insufficient safety decision-making capability relative to task demands but also avoid decision laxity and distraction caused by excessive capability. This balance ensures optimal decision-making and reduces occupational safety accidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107144"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753526000354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational safety decision-making failures among employees represent a fundamental challenge for organizations, as such failures are a significant factor in unsafe behaviors and accidents. However, the specific causes of occupational safety decision-making failure remain inadequately understood. To address this research gap, this study explores the mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure from the perspective of the matching degree between safety decision-making capability and task demands. Drawing on the task-capability interface model and resource limitation theory, this study proposes that a U-shaped relationship between the matching degree of safety decision-making capability and task demands, and safety decision-making failure. Through an experimental vignette study involving 252 industry employees and hierarchical regression analysis, the study validates the proposed model. The results indicate that the impact of the matching degree between safety decision-making capability and task demands on safety decision-making failure is U-shaped. Additionally, optimism bias moderates this U-shaped relationship. Theoretically, this study is the first to propose and validate the U-shaped impact of safety decision-making capability-task demand matching degree on safety decision-making failure. This finding not only deepens the understanding of the potential mechanisms of occupational safety decision-making failure but also contributes to the development of the task-capability interface model. Practically, the study emphasizes the importance of dynamically balancing safety decision-making capability and task demands. Organizations should not only prevent risks arising from insufficient safety decision-making capability relative to task demands but also avoid decision laxity and distraction caused by excessive capability. This balance ensures optimal decision-making and reduces occupational safety accidents.
工人如何决定安全工作?职业安全决策失效的机制
员工的职业安全决策失误对组织来说是一个根本性的挑战,因为这种失误是不安全行为和事故的重要因素。然而,职业安全决策失败的具体原因仍然没有得到充分的了解。为弥补这一研究空白,本研究从安全决策能力与任务需求匹配度的角度探讨职业安全决策失效的机制。利用任务-能力接口模型和资源限制理论,提出安全决策能力与任务需求匹配程度与安全决策失败呈u型关系。通过252名行业从业人员的实验研究和层次回归分析,验证了模型的有效性。结果表明:安全决策能力与任务需求的匹配程度对安全决策失败的影响呈u型;此外,乐观偏见调节了这种u型关系。在理论上,本研究首次提出并验证了安全决策能力-任务需求匹配度对安全决策失败的u型影响。这一发现不仅加深了对职业安全决策失败潜在机制的理解,而且有助于任务-能力界面模型的发展。实际上,研究强调了安全决策能力与任务需求动态平衡的重要性。组织既要防止安全决策能力相对于任务需求不足带来的风险,又要避免能力过大导致的决策松弛和分散注意力。这种平衡确保了最佳决策并减少了职业安全事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书