Impact of harvesting via flocculation on protein yield from Chlorella vulgaris following pulsed electric field and high-pressure homogenization treatments

IF 5 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Viviane de Carvalho Arabidian , Alexander S.K. Müller , Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto , Débora Pez Jaeschke , Tito Roberto Sant'Anna Cadaval Jr. , Wolfgang Frey , Christian Gusbeth
{"title":"Impact of harvesting via flocculation on protein yield from Chlorella vulgaris following pulsed electric field and high-pressure homogenization treatments","authors":"Viviane de Carvalho Arabidian ,&nbsp;Alexander S.K. Müller ,&nbsp;Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto ,&nbsp;Débora Pez Jaeschke ,&nbsp;Tito Roberto Sant'Anna Cadaval Jr. ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Frey ,&nbsp;Christian Gusbeth","doi":"10.1016/j.algal.2026.104611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing interest in sustainable biomass sources has encouraged research on microalgae, particularly focusing on improving the efficiency of cell separation and extraction processes. Currently, the harvesting step is primarily performed by centrifugation, which requires high energy consumption, especially for large-scale cultivation volumes. Therefore, this study aimed to explore coagulation/flocculation as an alternative harvesting method for <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em>, using FeCl<sub>2</sub>, FeCl<sub>3</sub>, and chitosan. Additionally, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the different flocculants on subsequent protein extraction, comparing extraction yields obtained by pulsed electric field (PEF) and high-pressure homogenization (HPH) treatment for the first time. The results indicated that FeCl<sub>3</sub> had the highest flocculation efficiency, reaching over 99% with a lower dosage than the other flocculants (200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>). Although FeCl₃ achieved the highest flocculation efficiency (over 99% at a low dosage of 200 mg·L<sup>−1</sup>), the subsequent protein extraction yields were lower compared to centrifuged biomass. Protein recovery from FeCl₃-flocculated biomass reached only 9.22% of cell dry weight (CDW) with HPH and 0.5% of CDW with PEF, whereas centrifugation resulted in higher yields of 49.4% and 19.5% of CDW, respectively. These results indicate that while floc formation is effective for biomass harvesting, it may hinder protein extraction and reduce biomolecule recovery. Additionally, the protein profile analyzed by SDS-PAGE confirmed the negative impact of using flocculants, showing a disappearance or reduction of bands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7855,"journal":{"name":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 104611"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211926426000962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing interest in sustainable biomass sources has encouraged research on microalgae, particularly focusing on improving the efficiency of cell separation and extraction processes. Currently, the harvesting step is primarily performed by centrifugation, which requires high energy consumption, especially for large-scale cultivation volumes. Therefore, this study aimed to explore coagulation/flocculation as an alternative harvesting method for Chlorella vulgaris, using FeCl2, FeCl3, and chitosan. Additionally, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of the different flocculants on subsequent protein extraction, comparing extraction yields obtained by pulsed electric field (PEF) and high-pressure homogenization (HPH) treatment for the first time. The results indicated that FeCl3 had the highest flocculation efficiency, reaching over 99% with a lower dosage than the other flocculants (200 mg L−1). Although FeCl₃ achieved the highest flocculation efficiency (over 99% at a low dosage of 200 mg·L−1), the subsequent protein extraction yields were lower compared to centrifuged biomass. Protein recovery from FeCl₃-flocculated biomass reached only 9.22% of cell dry weight (CDW) with HPH and 0.5% of CDW with PEF, whereas centrifugation resulted in higher yields of 49.4% and 19.5% of CDW, respectively. These results indicate that while floc formation is effective for biomass harvesting, it may hinder protein extraction and reduce biomolecule recovery. Additionally, the protein profile analyzed by SDS-PAGE confirmed the negative impact of using flocculants, showing a disappearance or reduction of bands.

Abstract Image

脉冲电场和高压均质处理下絮凝收获对小球藻蛋白质产量的影响
对可持续生物质来源的日益增长的兴趣鼓励了对微藻的研究,特别是侧重于提高细胞分离和提取过程的效率。目前,收获步骤主要是通过离心进行,这需要很高的能量消耗,特别是对于大规模的种植量。因此,本研究旨在探索以FeCl2、FeCl3和壳聚糖为原料的混凝/絮凝法作为普通小球藻的替代收获方法。此外,本研究旨在评估不同絮凝剂对后续蛋白质提取的影响,首次比较脉冲电场(PEF)和高压均质(HPH)处理的提取率。结果表明,FeCl3的絮凝效果最好,在投加量(200 mg L−1)较低的情况下,絮凝效果可达99%以上。虽然FeCl₃取得了最高的絮凝效率(在200 mg·L−1的低剂量下超过99%),但与离心生物质相比,随后的蛋白质提取率较低。用HPH法和PEF法对FeCl₃絮凝生物量的蛋白质回收率分别为细胞干重(CDW)的9.22%和0.5%,而离心法的回收率分别为49.4%和19.5%。这些结果表明,虽然絮凝体的形成对生物量的收获是有效的,但它可能会阻碍蛋白质的提取并降低生物分子的回收率。此外,SDS-PAGE分析的蛋白质谱图证实了絮凝剂的负面影响,显示出条带消失或减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts
Algal Research-Biomass Biofuels and Bioproducts BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.80%
发文量
332
期刊介绍: Algal Research is an international phycology journal covering all areas of emerging technologies in algae biology, biomass production, cultivation, harvesting, extraction, bioproducts, biorefinery, engineering, and econometrics. Algae is defined to include cyanobacteria, microalgae, and protists and symbionts of interest in biotechnology. The journal publishes original research and reviews for the following scope: algal biology, including but not exclusive to: phylogeny, biodiversity, molecular traits, metabolic regulation, and genetic engineering, algal cultivation, e.g. phototrophic systems, heterotrophic systems, and mixotrophic systems, algal harvesting and extraction systems, biotechnology to convert algal biomass and components into biofuels and bioproducts, e.g., nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, animal feed, plastics, etc. algal products and their economic assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书