Designing lightweight nanolattices: multiscale optimization of geometry and size effects

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Thin-Walled Structures Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.tws.2026.114704
Hyoui Yoon , Hyobi Lee , Sangryun Lee
{"title":"Designing lightweight nanolattices: multiscale optimization of geometry and size effects","authors":"Hyoui Yoon ,&nbsp;Hyobi Lee ,&nbsp;Sangryun Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2026.114704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lattice–truss structures have emerged as lightweight architected materials capable of achieving exceptional stiffness-to-weight ratios through geometry-driven design. Nanolattice architectures—composed of periodic networks of nanoscale beams—offer an opportunity to realize lightweight yet mechanically robust materials, whose properties can surpass those of bulk alternatives. However, the mechanical behavior of nanolattices remains difficult to predict accurately, as intrinsic size effects due to surface stresses can substantially alter nanolattice properties. Although multiscale approaches coupling atomistic simulations with continuum models have been employed, the individual contributions of surface-induced stresses and geometric design to nanolattice stiffness have not been clearly distinguished. To address this issue, this study introduces a unified multiscale framework that explicitly separates and quantifies surface-stress effects and beam geometry effects in nanolattice structures. By coupling molecular statics (MS) simulations with finite element analysis (FEA), the mechanical behaviors of body-centered (BC) and octet-truss (OT) lattices are evaluated under controlled beam geometries and lattice size variations. The results demonstrate that the optimal geometries identified at the continuum scale remain valid at the nanoscale when surface effects are incorporated. Surface-stress-corrected MS results exhibit strong agreement with FEA predictions, confirming that geometry-driven stress redistribution, rather than intrinsic surface tension, governs the effective stiffness response. Both BC and OT lattices exhibit a size-dependent stiffening trend, originating from the increase in the axial stiffness of individual nanobeams as their diameter decreases. These findings elucidate how geometry, scale, and surface energy collectively govern mechanical stiffness in nanolattices, providing fundamental design guidelines for lightweight and high-stiffness nanoscale architectures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 114704"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823126002284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lattice–truss structures have emerged as lightweight architected materials capable of achieving exceptional stiffness-to-weight ratios through geometry-driven design. Nanolattice architectures—composed of periodic networks of nanoscale beams—offer an opportunity to realize lightweight yet mechanically robust materials, whose properties can surpass those of bulk alternatives. However, the mechanical behavior of nanolattices remains difficult to predict accurately, as intrinsic size effects due to surface stresses can substantially alter nanolattice properties. Although multiscale approaches coupling atomistic simulations with continuum models have been employed, the individual contributions of surface-induced stresses and geometric design to nanolattice stiffness have not been clearly distinguished. To address this issue, this study introduces a unified multiscale framework that explicitly separates and quantifies surface-stress effects and beam geometry effects in nanolattice structures. By coupling molecular statics (MS) simulations with finite element analysis (FEA), the mechanical behaviors of body-centered (BC) and octet-truss (OT) lattices are evaluated under controlled beam geometries and lattice size variations. The results demonstrate that the optimal geometries identified at the continuum scale remain valid at the nanoscale when surface effects are incorporated. Surface-stress-corrected MS results exhibit strong agreement with FEA predictions, confirming that geometry-driven stress redistribution, rather than intrinsic surface tension, governs the effective stiffness response. Both BC and OT lattices exhibit a size-dependent stiffening trend, originating from the increase in the axial stiffness of individual nanobeams as their diameter decreases. These findings elucidate how geometry, scale, and surface energy collectively govern mechanical stiffness in nanolattices, providing fundamental design guidelines for lightweight and high-stiffness nanoscale architectures.
设计轻量化纳米晶格:几何和尺寸效应的多尺度优化
格架结构已经成为一种轻质建筑材料,能够通过几何驱动设计实现特殊的刚度-重量比。纳米晶格结构——由纳米级光束的周期性网络组成——提供了一个实现轻量化但机械坚固的材料的机会,其性能可以超过那些块状替代品。然而,纳米晶格的力学行为仍然难以准确预测,因为表面应力引起的固有尺寸效应可以大大改变纳米晶格的性质。虽然已经采用了多尺度方法将原子模拟与连续介质模型相结合,但表面诱导应力和几何设计对纳米晶格刚度的单独贡献尚未得到明确区分。为了解决这个问题,本研究引入了一个统一的多尺度框架,明确地分离和量化纳米晶格结构中的表面应力效应和梁几何效应。通过分子静力学(MS)模拟与有限元分析(FEA)相结合的方法,研究了受控梁几何形状和晶格尺寸变化下体心(BC)和八元桁架(OT)晶格的力学行为。结果表明,当考虑表面效应时,在连续尺度上确定的最佳几何形状在纳米尺度上仍然有效。表面应力校正的质谱结果与有限元预测结果非常吻合,证实了几何驱动的应力重分布,而不是固有的表面张力,决定了有效的刚度响应。BC和OT晶格都表现出与尺寸相关的硬化趋势,这源于单个纳米梁的轴向刚度随着其直径的减小而增加。这些发现阐明了几何、尺度和表面能如何共同控制纳米晶格的机械刚度,为轻量化和高刚度纳米尺度结构提供了基本的设计指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书