Generative artificial intelligence and urban transport resilience: Rethinking sustainable mobility

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Safety Science Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107148
Jinran Wu , Xin Tian , Qingyang Liu , Tong Li , Chanjuan Liu , Jing Xu , Huida Zhao
{"title":"Generative artificial intelligence and urban transport resilience: Rethinking sustainable mobility","authors":"Jinran Wu ,&nbsp;Xin Tian ,&nbsp;Qingyang Liu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Chanjuan Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Xu ,&nbsp;Huida Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban transport systems face compounding shocks, cascading failures, and rapid context shifts that challenge conventional artificial intelligence (AI) tools designed for structured inputs and stable data regimes. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) expands disruption management by enabling interaction with heterogeneous information, evidence-grounded synthesis, scenario generation under deep uncertainty, and decision support. This review maps the emerging field and clarifies how GAI can strengthen urban transport resilience while introducing new safety-critical risks. We first conduct a dual-corpus bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Core Collection (2016–2025), covering 1670 AI and resilience publications and a 114-paper GAI subset. We then develop a phase-linked framework that connects four GAI roles — information extraction, knowledge integration, scenario generation, and decision support — to the resilience phases of absorption, adaptation, recovery, and transformation. Synthesising empirical studies across transport operations, planning, and Earth observation (EO) and remote-sensing vision-language model (VLM)–large language model (LLM) pipelines, we find that current evidence is strongest at the capability level, whereas phase-specific transport impacts are less routinely quantified under real operational constraints. Finally, we translate these gaps into an agenda for evaluation and governance, emphasising reliability and uncertainty communication, cybersecurity, data governance and interoperability, and equity-oriented public value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107148"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753526000391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban transport systems face compounding shocks, cascading failures, and rapid context shifts that challenge conventional artificial intelligence (AI) tools designed for structured inputs and stable data regimes. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) expands disruption management by enabling interaction with heterogeneous information, evidence-grounded synthesis, scenario generation under deep uncertainty, and decision support. This review maps the emerging field and clarifies how GAI can strengthen urban transport resilience while introducing new safety-critical risks. We first conduct a dual-corpus bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Core Collection (2016–2025), covering 1670 AI and resilience publications and a 114-paper GAI subset. We then develop a phase-linked framework that connects four GAI roles — information extraction, knowledge integration, scenario generation, and decision support — to the resilience phases of absorption, adaptation, recovery, and transformation. Synthesising empirical studies across transport operations, planning, and Earth observation (EO) and remote-sensing vision-language model (VLM)–large language model (LLM) pipelines, we find that current evidence is strongest at the capability level, whereas phase-specific transport impacts are less routinely quantified under real operational constraints. Finally, we translate these gaps into an agenda for evaluation and governance, emphasising reliability and uncertainty communication, cybersecurity, data governance and interoperability, and equity-oriented public value.
生成式人工智能与城市交通弹性:重新思考可持续交通
城市交通系统面临着复杂的冲击、级联故障和快速的环境变化,这些挑战了传统的人工智能(AI)工具,这些工具专为结构化输入和稳定的数据制度而设计。生成式人工智能(GAI)通过支持与异构信息的交互、基于证据的合成、深度不确定性下的场景生成和决策支持来扩展中断管理。这篇综述描绘了新兴领域,并阐明了GAI如何在引入新的安全关键风险的同时加强城市交通弹性。我们首先对Web of Science核心馆藏(2016-2025)进行了双语料库文献计量分析,涵盖了1670篇AI和弹性出版物以及114篇GAI论文子集。然后,我们开发了一个相关联的框架,将四个GAI角色——信息提取、知识集成、场景生成和决策支持——与吸收、适应、恢复和转换的弹性阶段联系起来。综合运输运营、规划、地球观测(EO)和遥感视觉语言模型(VLM) -大型语言模型(LLM)管道的经验研究,我们发现目前的证据在能力层面上是最强的,而在实际运营约束下,特定阶段的运输影响较少被量化。最后,我们将这些差距转化为评估和治理议程,强调可靠性和不确定性通信、网络安全、数据治理和互操作性,以及以公平为导向的公共价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书