Rosemary HM Lim , Sophie Hide , Omotoyosi Akanbi , Jane Carthey , Claire Cox , Clare Crowley , Christopher Elston , Saskia Fursland , Tracey Herlihey , Scott Hislop , Catherine Leon , Cherry Lumley , Jenny O’Donnell , Catherine O’Reilly , Melanie Ottewill , Deinniol Owens , Laura Pickup , Louise Pye , Yasmin Razmus , Nicholas Seaton , Nicholas Woodier
{"title":"Development of a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators: a modified e-Delphi study","authors":"Rosemary HM Lim , Sophie Hide , Omotoyosi Akanbi , Jane Carthey , Claire Cox , Clare Crowley , Christopher Elston , Saskia Fursland , Tracey Herlihey , Scott Hislop , Catherine Leon , Cherry Lumley , Jenny O’Donnell , Catherine O’Reilly , Melanie Ottewill , Deinniol Owens , Laura Pickup , Louise Pye , Yasmin Razmus , Nicholas Seaton , Nicholas Woodier","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Systems-based healthcare safety investigation is an important initiative to improve patient safety worldwide. It requires the use of credible methods and approaches by competent investigators. There is currently no empirically developed competency framework for the healthcare safety investigator role. We developed a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators using an empirical research approach.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We used a two-round modified Delphi technique electronically. Two web-based surveys were sent to a panel of experts in healthcare safety investigations in England. The panel rated the relevance of a proposed set of competencies and provided qualitative comments. Strength of agreement was assessed using the interquartile range (IQR), the median and percentage agreement. Participants’ comments were reviewed, with reference to the contemporary healthcare safety literature and practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 participants completed the round-one survey. In round two, 24 of the 28 participants completed the survey. At the end of the round-two survey, 38 competencies and 82 corresponding descriptors were agreed as relevant with high agreement levels (IQR ≤ 1.25, median ≥ 4, percentage agreement ≥ 70%). These were organised in four domains: 1. Personal qualities, 2. Investigation knowledge and skill application, 3. Effective and compassionate engagement, and 4. Manages investigation lifecycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, this is the first empirically derived competency framework specifically focused on the healthcare safety investigator role. The high levels of agreement among participants give credibility to the findings. This competency framework provides an evidence base to inform the scope and requirements of the healthcare safety investigator workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107161"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753526000524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Systems-based healthcare safety investigation is an important initiative to improve patient safety worldwide. It requires the use of credible methods and approaches by competent investigators. There is currently no empirically developed competency framework for the healthcare safety investigator role. We developed a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators using an empirical research approach.
Method
We used a two-round modified Delphi technique electronically. Two web-based surveys were sent to a panel of experts in healthcare safety investigations in England. The panel rated the relevance of a proposed set of competencies and provided qualitative comments. Strength of agreement was assessed using the interquartile range (IQR), the median and percentage agreement. Participants’ comments were reviewed, with reference to the contemporary healthcare safety literature and practice.
Results
A total of 28 participants completed the round-one survey. In round two, 24 of the 28 participants completed the survey. At the end of the round-two survey, 38 competencies and 82 corresponding descriptors were agreed as relevant with high agreement levels (IQR ≤ 1.25, median ≥ 4, percentage agreement ≥ 70%). These were organised in four domains: 1. Personal qualities, 2. Investigation knowledge and skill application, 3. Effective and compassionate engagement, and 4. Manages investigation lifecycle.
Conclusion
To our knowledge, this is the first empirically derived competency framework specifically focused on the healthcare safety investigator role. The high levels of agreement among participants give credibility to the findings. This competency framework provides an evidence base to inform the scope and requirements of the healthcare safety investigator workforce.
期刊介绍:
Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.