Development of a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators: a modified e-Delphi study

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Safety Science Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107161
Rosemary HM Lim , Sophie Hide , Omotoyosi Akanbi , Jane Carthey , Claire Cox , Clare Crowley , Christopher Elston , Saskia Fursland , Tracey Herlihey , Scott Hislop , Catherine Leon , Cherry Lumley , Jenny O’Donnell , Catherine O’Reilly , Melanie Ottewill , Deinniol Owens , Laura Pickup , Louise Pye , Yasmin Razmus , Nicholas Seaton , Nicholas Woodier
{"title":"Development of a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators: a modified e-Delphi study","authors":"Rosemary HM Lim ,&nbsp;Sophie Hide ,&nbsp;Omotoyosi Akanbi ,&nbsp;Jane Carthey ,&nbsp;Claire Cox ,&nbsp;Clare Crowley ,&nbsp;Christopher Elston ,&nbsp;Saskia Fursland ,&nbsp;Tracey Herlihey ,&nbsp;Scott Hislop ,&nbsp;Catherine Leon ,&nbsp;Cherry Lumley ,&nbsp;Jenny O’Donnell ,&nbsp;Catherine O’Reilly ,&nbsp;Melanie Ottewill ,&nbsp;Deinniol Owens ,&nbsp;Laura Pickup ,&nbsp;Louise Pye ,&nbsp;Yasmin Razmus ,&nbsp;Nicholas Seaton ,&nbsp;Nicholas Woodier","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2026.107161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Systems-based healthcare safety investigation is an important initiative to improve patient safety worldwide. It requires the use of credible methods and approaches by competent investigators. There is currently no empirically developed competency framework for the healthcare safety investigator role. We developed a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators using an empirical research approach.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We used a two-round modified Delphi technique electronically. Two web-based surveys were sent to a panel of experts in healthcare safety investigations in England. The panel rated the relevance of a proposed set of competencies and provided qualitative comments. Strength of agreement was assessed using the interquartile range (IQR), the median and percentage agreement. Participants’ comments were reviewed, with reference to the contemporary healthcare safety literature and practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 28 participants completed the round-one survey. In round two, 24 of the 28 participants completed the survey. At the end of the round-two survey, 38 competencies and 82 corresponding descriptors were agreed as relevant with high agreement levels (IQR ≤ 1.25, median ≥ 4, percentage agreement ≥ 70%). These were organised in four domains: 1. Personal qualities, 2. Investigation knowledge and skill application, 3. Effective and compassionate engagement, and 4. Manages investigation lifecycle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To our knowledge, this is the first empirically derived competency framework specifically focused on the healthcare safety investigator role. The high levels of agreement among participants give credibility to the findings. This competency framework provides an evidence base to inform the scope and requirements of the healthcare safety investigator workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107161"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753526000524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Systems-based healthcare safety investigation is an important initiative to improve patient safety worldwide. It requires the use of credible methods and approaches by competent investigators. There is currently no empirically developed competency framework for the healthcare safety investigator role. We developed a competency framework for healthcare safety investigators using an empirical research approach.

Method

We used a two-round modified Delphi technique electronically. Two web-based surveys were sent to a panel of experts in healthcare safety investigations in England. The panel rated the relevance of a proposed set of competencies and provided qualitative comments. Strength of agreement was assessed using the interquartile range (IQR), the median and percentage agreement. Participants’ comments were reviewed, with reference to the contemporary healthcare safety literature and practice.

Results

A total of 28 participants completed the round-one survey. In round two, 24 of the 28 participants completed the survey. At the end of the round-two survey, 38 competencies and 82 corresponding descriptors were agreed as relevant with high agreement levels (IQR ≤ 1.25, median ≥ 4, percentage agreement ≥ 70%). These were organised in four domains: 1. Personal qualities, 2. Investigation knowledge and skill application, 3. Effective and compassionate engagement, and 4. Manages investigation lifecycle.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first empirically derived competency framework specifically focused on the healthcare safety investigator role. The high levels of agreement among participants give credibility to the findings. This competency framework provides an evidence base to inform the scope and requirements of the healthcare safety investigator workforce.
医疗安全调查人员能力框架的发展:一项修改的e-德尔菲研究
背景:基于系统的医疗安全调查是提高全球患者安全的重要举措。它要求有能力的调查人员使用可信的方法和途径。目前还没有针对医疗安全调查员角色的经验开发的能力框架。我们使用实证研究方法为医疗安全调查人员开发了一个能力框架。方法采用两轮改进德尔菲电子技术。两份基于网络的调查被发送给英国医疗安全调查专家小组。该小组对拟议的一套胜任能力的相关性进行了评级,并提供了定性评论。一致性强度采用四分位数范围(IQR)、中位数和一致性百分比进行评估。参考当代卫生保健安全文献和实践,回顾了与会者的意见。结果共有28名参与者完成了第一轮调查。在第二轮中,28名参与者中有24人完成了调查。在第二轮调查结束时,38个胜任力和82个相应的描述符被认为具有高一致性水平(IQR≤1.25,中位数≥4,百分比一致性≥70%)。这些被组织在四个领域:1。2.个人素质;2 .调查知识与技能应用;有效和富有同情心的参与;管理调查生命周期。据我们所知,这是第一个专门针对医疗安全调查员角色的经验推导的能力框架。参与者之间的高度一致为研究结果提供了可信度。该能力框架提供了一个证据基础,以告知医疗安全调查员工作人员的范围和要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书