Scaling up floating offshore wind farm installation: From conventional to modular strategies

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Applied Energy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127560
Manu Centeno-Telleria , Raúl Guanche , Markel Penalba
{"title":"Scaling up floating offshore wind farm installation: From conventional to modular strategies","authors":"Manu Centeno-Telleria ,&nbsp;Raúl Guanche ,&nbsp;Markel Penalba","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With only small-scale floating offshore wind (FOW) farms installed to date, and commercial-scale projects anticipated in the coming years, reconsidering conventional installation strategies is essential to understand the challenges associated with scaling up. To this end, this paper introduces a novel discrete-event simulation model, <em>instaSIM®</em>, which is validated against data corresponding to the Hywind Scotland farm, demonstrating discrepancies of less than five days between simulated and observed durations. Once validated, different scenarios for scaling up FOW installation are evaluated. Results indicate that farms comprising more than 10–15 turbines cannot be installed within a single year using the conventional installation strategy, with installation costs increasing significantly due to metocean-related delays. To address these limitations, three modular installation strategies are proposed and evaluated for a 40-turbine and 600-MW FOW farm: parallel, consecutive and hybrid. Compared to the conventional baseline of 1200 days and 225 M€, all three strategies reduce total installation costs by 54%. However, the total duration varies across strategies: the parallel approach requires 137 days (88% reduction), while the hybrid strategy requires 500 days (58% lower) and the consecutive configuration extends to 1232 days. In addition to cost savings, the modular strategies enable an earlier power generation and faster CAPEX recovery. By the time the conventional strategy completes installation and starts producing energy, the consecutive, hybrid and parallel approaches would have already produced 3.8 TWh, 6.4 TWh and 7.7 TWh of electricity, respectively, corresponding to revenues of 840 M€, 1370 M€ and 1650 M€, and CAPEX recoveries of 29%, 48% and 57%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127560"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926002126","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With only small-scale floating offshore wind (FOW) farms installed to date, and commercial-scale projects anticipated in the coming years, reconsidering conventional installation strategies is essential to understand the challenges associated with scaling up. To this end, this paper introduces a novel discrete-event simulation model, instaSIM®, which is validated against data corresponding to the Hywind Scotland farm, demonstrating discrepancies of less than five days between simulated and observed durations. Once validated, different scenarios for scaling up FOW installation are evaluated. Results indicate that farms comprising more than 10–15 turbines cannot be installed within a single year using the conventional installation strategy, with installation costs increasing significantly due to metocean-related delays. To address these limitations, three modular installation strategies are proposed and evaluated for a 40-turbine and 600-MW FOW farm: parallel, consecutive and hybrid. Compared to the conventional baseline of 1200 days and 225 M€, all three strategies reduce total installation costs by 54%. However, the total duration varies across strategies: the parallel approach requires 137 days (88% reduction), while the hybrid strategy requires 500 days (58% lower) and the consecutive configuration extends to 1232 days. In addition to cost savings, the modular strategies enable an earlier power generation and faster CAPEX recovery. By the time the conventional strategy completes installation and starts producing energy, the consecutive, hybrid and parallel approaches would have already produced 3.8 TWh, 6.4 TWh and 7.7 TWh of electricity, respectively, corresponding to revenues of 840 M€, 1370 M€ and 1650 M€, and CAPEX recoveries of 29%, 48% and 57%.
扩大浮动海上风电场的安装:从传统到模块化策略
由于目前只安装了小型海上浮式风力发电场(FOW),预计未来几年将有商业规模的项目,因此重新考虑传统的安装策略对于理解扩大规模所带来的挑战至关重要。为此,本文介绍了一种新的离散事件模拟模型instaSIM®,该模型根据Hywind苏格兰农场的相应数据进行了验证,结果表明模拟持续时间与观测持续时间之间的差异小于5天。验证后,将评估扩展flow安装的不同场景。结果表明,使用传统的安装策略,由10-15台以上涡轮机组成的农场无法在一年内安装完毕,由于海洋相关的延迟,安装成本显着增加。为了解决这些限制,提出并评估了40台涡轮机和600兆瓦FOW农场的三种模块化安装策略:并联,连续和混合。与传统的1200天和2.25亿欧元的基线相比,这三种策略将总安装成本降低了54%。然而,不同策略的总持续时间不同:并行方法需要137天(减少88%),而混合策略需要500天(减少58%),连续配置延长到1232天。除了节省成本外,模块化策略还可以实现更早的发电和更快的资本支出回收。当传统策略完成安装并开始发电时,连续、混合和并行方法将分别产生3.8太瓦时、6.4太瓦时和7.7太瓦时的电力,相应的收入为8.4亿欧元、13.7亿欧元和16.5亿欧元,资本支出回收率为29%、48%和57%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书