Autotrophic denitrification filter prepared using gasification coarse slag and pyrite: Physicochemical characteristics and performance removal of nitrogen

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Shuhan Yang , Defu Xu , Jing Su , Zhengxuan Li , Alan Howard
{"title":"Autotrophic denitrification filter prepared using gasification coarse slag and pyrite: Physicochemical characteristics and performance removal of nitrogen","authors":"Shuhan Yang ,&nbsp;Defu Xu ,&nbsp;Jing Su ,&nbsp;Zhengxuan Li ,&nbsp;Alan Howard","doi":"10.1016/j.ibiod.2026.106312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conventional heterotrophic denitrification processes face challenges in achieving the requirements of sustainable development goals due to their dependence on external organic carbon sources and the risk of secondary pollution. In this study, the nitrogen removal performance of a sulfur autotrophic denitrification filter prepared from gasification coarse slag (GCS) and pyrite was evaluated, and its underlying mechanisms were elucidated using microbial community, EDS-SEM, BET, and FT-IR analyses. Pyrite and GCS were combined at a 4:6 mass ratio, followed by the addition of Silica fume (7%), NaOH (4%), and Portland cement (10%) all expressed as percentages relative to the total mass of GCS and pyrite mass). The resulting mixture was granulated to form 10-mm GCS-PRFM particles and steam-cured at 80 °C. The GCS-PRFM exhibited a compressive strength of 3.0 MPa, bulk density of 1272 kg/m<sup>3</sup>, water absorption rate of 13.5%, specific surface area of 17.00 m<sup>2</sup>/g, and total pore volume of 0.048 cm<sup>3</sup>/g. Its specific surface area and total pore volume were 10.3-fold and 16-fold greater, respectively, than those of the pyrite filter (PRFM). The nitrate removal efficiency of GCS-PRFM (81.23%) was approximately double that of PRFM (40.92%). GCS-PRFM supported a higher abundance of <em>Thiobacillus</em>, <em>Rhodanobacter</em>, <em>Ferruginibacter</em>, and <em>Sulfurimonas</em> than PRFM. Following wastewater treatment, sulfur content decreased by 77.19% in GCS-PRFM compared with only 6.23% in PRFM, indicating greater sulfur utilization by autotrophic microorganisms. These findings demonstrate that the higher surface area, pore volume, and sulfur availability of GCS-PRFM promote microbial growth and enhance nitrate removal efficiency. The study provides a novel approach for preparing sulfur autotrophic denitrification filters using pyrite and industrial solid waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13643,"journal":{"name":"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 106312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830526000375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional heterotrophic denitrification processes face challenges in achieving the requirements of sustainable development goals due to their dependence on external organic carbon sources and the risk of secondary pollution. In this study, the nitrogen removal performance of a sulfur autotrophic denitrification filter prepared from gasification coarse slag (GCS) and pyrite was evaluated, and its underlying mechanisms were elucidated using microbial community, EDS-SEM, BET, and FT-IR analyses. Pyrite and GCS were combined at a 4:6 mass ratio, followed by the addition of Silica fume (7%), NaOH (4%), and Portland cement (10%) all expressed as percentages relative to the total mass of GCS and pyrite mass). The resulting mixture was granulated to form 10-mm GCS-PRFM particles and steam-cured at 80 °C. The GCS-PRFM exhibited a compressive strength of 3.0 MPa, bulk density of 1272 kg/m3, water absorption rate of 13.5%, specific surface area of 17.00 m2/g, and total pore volume of 0.048 cm3/g. Its specific surface area and total pore volume were 10.3-fold and 16-fold greater, respectively, than those of the pyrite filter (PRFM). The nitrate removal efficiency of GCS-PRFM (81.23%) was approximately double that of PRFM (40.92%). GCS-PRFM supported a higher abundance of Thiobacillus, Rhodanobacter, Ferruginibacter, and Sulfurimonas than PRFM. Following wastewater treatment, sulfur content decreased by 77.19% in GCS-PRFM compared with only 6.23% in PRFM, indicating greater sulfur utilization by autotrophic microorganisms. These findings demonstrate that the higher surface area, pore volume, and sulfur availability of GCS-PRFM promote microbial growth and enhance nitrate removal efficiency. The study provides a novel approach for preparing sulfur autotrophic denitrification filters using pyrite and industrial solid waste.
利用气化粗渣和黄铁矿制备自养反硝化过滤器:理化特性及脱氮性能
传统异养反硝化工艺由于依赖外部有机碳源和存在二次污染风险,在实现可持续发展目标方面面临挑战。本研究以气化粗渣(GCS)和黄铁矿为原料制备的硫自养反硝化过滤器的脱氮性能进行了评价,并通过微生物群落、EDS-SEM、BET和FT-IR分析阐明了其潜在机制。黄铁矿和黄铁矿以4:6的质量比混合,其次是硅灰(7%)、NaOH(4%)和波特兰水泥(10%)(均以相对于黄铁矿和黄铁矿总质量的百分比表示)。将得到的混合物造粒,形成10mm的GCS-PRFM颗粒,并在80℃下进行蒸汽固化。GCS-PRFM的抗压强度为3.0 MPa,容重为1272 kg/m3,吸水率为13.5%,比表面积为17.00 m2/g,总孔容为0.048 cm3/g。其比表面积和总孔容分别是黄铁矿过滤器(PRFM)的10.3倍和16倍。GCS-PRFM的硝酸盐去除率为81.23%,约为PRFM(40.92%)的2倍。GCS-PRFM比PRFM支持更高丰度的硫杆菌、罗丹诺杆菌、铁杆菌和硫单胞菌。废水处理后,GCS-PRFM的硫含量下降了77.19%,而PRFM的硫含量仅下降了6.23%,表明自养微生物对硫的利用更大。研究结果表明,GCS-PRFM具有较高的比表面积、孔隙体积和硫利用率,有利于微生物生长,提高硝酸盐去除效率。本研究为利用黄铁矿和工业固体废弃物制备硫自养反硝化滤池提供了一种新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
107
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation publishes original research papers and reviews on the biological causes of deterioration or degradation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书