Nishant Tyagi , Alexander Roth , Anibal Sanjab , Erik Delarue
{"title":"Sector coupling reimagined: Synthesizing fragmented perspectives into a unified framework","authors":"Nishant Tyagi , Alexander Roth , Anibal Sanjab , Erik Delarue","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sector coupling (SC), the integration of energy vectors and end-use sectors, is increasingly central to the net-zero transition but remains conceptually fragmented. This fragmentation causes modeling inconsistencies, hinders cross-study comparison, and undermines energy policy coordination. We address this gap through a structured mapping of existing definitions, categorizing them along three dimensions, namely, structural, functional, and electricity-centric, and analyzing their limitations. Drawing on these insights, we propose a coherent definition that captures SC in its full diversity and complexity: SC is the establishment of physical or non-physical interconnections, in any direction, among energy-carrying vectors, among energy-consuming end-use sectors, between vectors and sectors, and within the layers that link them (energy processing, transfer, markets, and policy). This framing clarifies what constitutes a “sector”, distinguishes “sector coupling” from related concepts such as “flexibility”, and encompasses the entire spectrum of interlinkages in a sector-coupled energy system. Building on this definition, we organize the SC interlinkages into six categories based on their driving mechanisms: vector coupling, end-use sector coupling, vector-shift coupling, network coupling, market coupling, and policy coupling. Together, our definition and classification provide a shared conceptual foundation for the SC field. The framework’s modular architecture enables extension to new end-use sectors, non-energy material flows, and material-energy circularity pathways. It can enable modelers to avoid unintentional mismatches in model scopes, standardize SC implementation in models, and trace cascading, system-wide interactions. It can also support policymakers in designing structured scenarios, identifying which SC pathway works best in specific settings, and coordinating cross-sector cross-vector policies. By synthesizing fragmented concepts into a coherent and comprehensive whole, this work advances the theory of the SC domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127550"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926002023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sector coupling (SC), the integration of energy vectors and end-use sectors, is increasingly central to the net-zero transition but remains conceptually fragmented. This fragmentation causes modeling inconsistencies, hinders cross-study comparison, and undermines energy policy coordination. We address this gap through a structured mapping of existing definitions, categorizing them along three dimensions, namely, structural, functional, and electricity-centric, and analyzing their limitations. Drawing on these insights, we propose a coherent definition that captures SC in its full diversity and complexity: SC is the establishment of physical or non-physical interconnections, in any direction, among energy-carrying vectors, among energy-consuming end-use sectors, between vectors and sectors, and within the layers that link them (energy processing, transfer, markets, and policy). This framing clarifies what constitutes a “sector”, distinguishes “sector coupling” from related concepts such as “flexibility”, and encompasses the entire spectrum of interlinkages in a sector-coupled energy system. Building on this definition, we organize the SC interlinkages into six categories based on their driving mechanisms: vector coupling, end-use sector coupling, vector-shift coupling, network coupling, market coupling, and policy coupling. Together, our definition and classification provide a shared conceptual foundation for the SC field. The framework’s modular architecture enables extension to new end-use sectors, non-energy material flows, and material-energy circularity pathways. It can enable modelers to avoid unintentional mismatches in model scopes, standardize SC implementation in models, and trace cascading, system-wide interactions. It can also support policymakers in designing structured scenarios, identifying which SC pathway works best in specific settings, and coordinating cross-sector cross-vector policies. By synthesizing fragmented concepts into a coherent and comprehensive whole, this work advances the theory of the SC domain.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.