Sector coupling reimagined: Synthesizing fragmented perspectives into a unified framework

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Applied Energy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127550
Nishant Tyagi , Alexander Roth , Anibal Sanjab , Erik Delarue
{"title":"Sector coupling reimagined: Synthesizing fragmented perspectives into a unified framework","authors":"Nishant Tyagi ,&nbsp;Alexander Roth ,&nbsp;Anibal Sanjab ,&nbsp;Erik Delarue","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sector coupling (SC), the integration of energy vectors and end-use sectors, is increasingly central to the net-zero transition but remains conceptually fragmented. This fragmentation causes modeling inconsistencies, hinders cross-study comparison, and undermines energy policy coordination. We address this gap through a structured mapping of existing definitions, categorizing them along three dimensions, namely, structural, functional, and electricity-centric, and analyzing their limitations. Drawing on these insights, we propose a coherent definition that captures SC in its full diversity and complexity: SC is the establishment of physical or non-physical interconnections, in any direction, among energy-carrying vectors, among energy-consuming end-use sectors, between vectors and sectors, and within the layers that link them (energy processing, transfer, markets, and policy). This framing clarifies what constitutes a “sector”, distinguishes “sector coupling” from related concepts such as “flexibility”, and encompasses the entire spectrum of interlinkages in a sector-coupled energy system. Building on this definition, we organize the SC interlinkages into six categories based on their driving mechanisms: vector coupling, end-use sector coupling, vector-shift coupling, network coupling, market coupling, and policy coupling. Together, our definition and classification provide a shared conceptual foundation for the SC field. The framework’s modular architecture enables extension to new end-use sectors, non-energy material flows, and material-energy circularity pathways. It can enable modelers to avoid unintentional mismatches in model scopes, standardize SC implementation in models, and trace cascading, system-wide interactions. It can also support policymakers in designing structured scenarios, identifying which SC pathway works best in specific settings, and coordinating cross-sector cross-vector policies. By synthesizing fragmented concepts into a coherent and comprehensive whole, this work advances the theory of the SC domain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127550"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926002023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sector coupling (SC), the integration of energy vectors and end-use sectors, is increasingly central to the net-zero transition but remains conceptually fragmented. This fragmentation causes modeling inconsistencies, hinders cross-study comparison, and undermines energy policy coordination. We address this gap through a structured mapping of existing definitions, categorizing them along three dimensions, namely, structural, functional, and electricity-centric, and analyzing their limitations. Drawing on these insights, we propose a coherent definition that captures SC in its full diversity and complexity: SC is the establishment of physical or non-physical interconnections, in any direction, among energy-carrying vectors, among energy-consuming end-use sectors, between vectors and sectors, and within the layers that link them (energy processing, transfer, markets, and policy). This framing clarifies what constitutes a “sector”, distinguishes “sector coupling” from related concepts such as “flexibility”, and encompasses the entire spectrum of interlinkages in a sector-coupled energy system. Building on this definition, we organize the SC interlinkages into six categories based on their driving mechanisms: vector coupling, end-use sector coupling, vector-shift coupling, network coupling, market coupling, and policy coupling. Together, our definition and classification provide a shared conceptual foundation for the SC field. The framework’s modular architecture enables extension to new end-use sectors, non-energy material flows, and material-energy circularity pathways. It can enable modelers to avoid unintentional mismatches in model scopes, standardize SC implementation in models, and trace cascading, system-wide interactions. It can also support policymakers in designing structured scenarios, identifying which SC pathway works best in specific settings, and coordinating cross-sector cross-vector policies. By synthesizing fragmented concepts into a coherent and comprehensive whole, this work advances the theory of the SC domain.
重新构想部门耦合:将碎片化的透视图合成为统一的框架
部门耦合(SC),即能源载体和最终用途部门的整合,对净零转型越来越重要,但在概念上仍然分散。这种碎片化导致建模不一致,阻碍了交叉研究比较,并破坏了能源政策协调。我们通过现有定义的结构化映射来解决这一差距,沿着三个维度对它们进行分类,即结构、功能和以电为中心,并分析它们的局限性。根据这些见解,我们提出了一个连贯的定义,以充分体现能源供应链的多样性和复杂性:能源供应链是在任何方向上,在能源运输载体之间,在能源消费终端使用部门之间,在向量和部门之间,以及在连接它们的层内(能源处理,转移,市场和政策)建立物理或非物理互连。这一框架阐明了“部门”的构成,将“部门耦合”与“灵活性”等相关概念区分开来,并涵盖了部门耦合能源系统中所有相互联系的范围。在此定义的基础上,我们根据其驱动机制将供应链相互联系分为六类:矢量耦合、最终用途部门耦合、矢量转移耦合、网络耦合、市场耦合和政策耦合。总之,我们的定义和分类为SC领域提供了一个共享的概念基础。该框架的模块化架构可以扩展到新的终端使用部门、非能源材料流和材料-能源循环路径。它可以使建模者避免模型范围中无意的不匹配,使模型中的SC实现标准化,并跟踪级联的、系统范围的交互。它还可以支持决策者设计结构化方案,确定在特定情况下哪种SC途径最有效,并协调跨部门的跨矢量政策。通过将支离破碎的概念综合成一个连贯和全面的整体,本工作推进了SC领域的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书