Decision-oriented assessment of redox flow batteries for grid-scale energy storage: Scalability, system complexity, and intelligent operation

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Applied Energy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127548
Behnam Seyyedi , Esmaeil Habibi
{"title":"Decision-oriented assessment of redox flow batteries for grid-scale energy storage: Scalability, system complexity, and intelligent operation","authors":"Behnam Seyyedi ,&nbsp;Esmaeil Habibi","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are widely regarded as promising candidates for grid-scale, long-duration energy storage due to their intrinsic safety, decoupled scaling of power and energy, and long cycle life. However, despite decades of intensive research and significant advances in electrolyte chemistry, electrode design, and system modeling, commercial deployment remains limited and concentrated in a small number of mature chemistries, indicating that performance-oriented optimization alone is insufficient to ensure deployability. In this review, we introduce a decision-oriented assessment framework-Scalability-Complexity-Intelligence (SCI) - to systematically evaluate RFB technologies based on their readiness for long-term operation, tolerance to system-level complexity, and the conditional value of intelligent control. Electrolyte chemistries, electrode and membrane components, modeling strategies, and hybrid system architectures are examined through a unified lens that emphasizes durability, manufacturability, operational predictability, and levelized cost of storage. The analysis demonstrates that many proposed RFB concepts achieve promising laboratory metrics at the expense of escalating system complexity, undermining scalability and long-term reliability, whereas technologies characterized by intrinsic chemical stability, transparent degradation behavior, and simplified system architectures exhibit stronger alignment with deployment realities. Advanced modeling, digital twins, and AI-assisted control are shown to deliver meaningful benefits primarily in chemically stable and operationally predictable systems, where intelligence enhances reliability rather than compensating for fundamental material or architectural limitations. By explicitly distinguishing deployable solutions from conditionally viable pathways and systemically constrained concepts, this review provides actionable guidance for researchers, system designers, and energy stakeholders seeking to translate redox flow battery innovation into reliable grid-scale energy storage infrastructure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127548"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192600200X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Redox flow batteries (RFBs) are widely regarded as promising candidates for grid-scale, long-duration energy storage due to their intrinsic safety, decoupled scaling of power and energy, and long cycle life. However, despite decades of intensive research and significant advances in electrolyte chemistry, electrode design, and system modeling, commercial deployment remains limited and concentrated in a small number of mature chemistries, indicating that performance-oriented optimization alone is insufficient to ensure deployability. In this review, we introduce a decision-oriented assessment framework-Scalability-Complexity-Intelligence (SCI) - to systematically evaluate RFB technologies based on their readiness for long-term operation, tolerance to system-level complexity, and the conditional value of intelligent control. Electrolyte chemistries, electrode and membrane components, modeling strategies, and hybrid system architectures are examined through a unified lens that emphasizes durability, manufacturability, operational predictability, and levelized cost of storage. The analysis demonstrates that many proposed RFB concepts achieve promising laboratory metrics at the expense of escalating system complexity, undermining scalability and long-term reliability, whereas technologies characterized by intrinsic chemical stability, transparent degradation behavior, and simplified system architectures exhibit stronger alignment with deployment realities. Advanced modeling, digital twins, and AI-assisted control are shown to deliver meaningful benefits primarily in chemically stable and operationally predictable systems, where intelligence enhances reliability rather than compensating for fundamental material or architectural limitations. By explicitly distinguishing deployable solutions from conditionally viable pathways and systemically constrained concepts, this review provides actionable guidance for researchers, system designers, and energy stakeholders seeking to translate redox flow battery innovation into reliable grid-scale energy storage infrastructure.

Abstract Image

面向电网规模储能的氧化还原液流电池决策评估:可扩展性、系统复杂性和智能运行
氧化还原液流电池(rfb)由于其固有的安全性、功率和能量的解耦缩放以及长循环寿命而被广泛认为是电网规模、长时间储能的有前途的候选者。然而,尽管在电解质化学、电极设计和系统建模方面进行了数十年的深入研究并取得了重大进展,但商业应用仍然有限,并且集中在少数成熟的化学物质中,这表明仅以性能为导向的优化不足以确保可部署性。在这篇综述中,我们引入了一个面向决策的评估框架——可扩展性-复杂性-智能(SCI)——来系统地评估RFB技术,基于它们对长期运行的准备程度、对系统级复杂性的容忍度以及智能控制的条件价值。电解质化学、电极和膜组件、建模策略和混合系统架构通过一个统一的镜头进行检查,强调耐用性、可制造性、操作可预测性和存储的平准化成本。分析表明,许多提出的RFB概念以增加系统复杂性、破坏可扩展性和长期可靠性为代价实现了有希望的实验室指标,而以内在化学稳定性、透明退化行为和简化的系统架构为特征的技术则表现出与部署现实更强的一致性。先进的建模、数字孪生和人工智能辅助控制主要在化学稳定和操作可预测的系统中提供了有意义的好处,在这些系统中,智能提高了可靠性,而不是补偿基本材料或架构的限制。通过明确区分可部署的解决方案与有条件可行的途径和系统约束的概念,本综述为研究人员、系统设计师和能源利益相关者提供了可操作的指导,以寻求将氧化还原液流电池创新转化为可靠的电网规模储能基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书