Identification of critical soil moisture thresholds and the water–energy regulation mechanisms in semi-arid sand dune–meadow ecosystems

IF 7.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110235
Simin Zhang , Limin Duan , Yongzhi Bao , Lina Hao , Xin Tong , V.P. Singh , Tingxi Liu
{"title":"Identification of critical soil moisture thresholds and the water–energy regulation mechanisms in semi-arid sand dune–meadow ecosystems","authors":"Simin Zhang ,&nbsp;Limin Duan ,&nbsp;Yongzhi Bao ,&nbsp;Lina Hao ,&nbsp;Xin Tong ,&nbsp;V.P. Singh ,&nbsp;Tingxi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dryland ecosystems are highly sensitive to global change, with their carbon–water cycling strongly regulated by soil moisture (SM). The critical soil moisture content at which the ecosystem shifts from energy limitation to water limitation during drought can be regarded as a soil moisture threshold that characterizes this regulation. Accurately quantifying critical soil moisture thresholds (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>) remains a key scientific challenge in elucidating the mechanisms of carbon–water interactions. This study focuses on the Horqin Sandy Land, one of the four major sandy regions in northern China, using long-term eddy covariance and environmental data collected from dune and meadow ecosystems during the growing seasons (May–September) from 2013 to 2024. Three methods—evaporative fraction (EF), covariance (Cov), and correlation difference (corr)—were used to identify to <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, marking the transition from energy-limited to water-limited states during drought. Furthermore, interpretable machine learning (XGBoost–SHAP) and dominance analysis (DA) were employed to elucidate the driving mechanisms of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>. Results showed that meadow ecosystems had stronger carbon uptake capacity, water regulatory potential, and environmental stability than dune ecosystems. The three methods yielded highly consistent <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> for both dune (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>EF</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.0676, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>Cov</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.0564, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>corr</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.0544 m³/m³) and meadow (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>EF</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.4335, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>Cov</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.4178, <span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>corr</mi></mrow></msubsup></math></span>: 0.3934 m³/m³) ecosystems, with standard deviations of 0.005 and 0.023 m³ /m³ , respectively. In dunes, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> was primarily driven by rainfall (Rain) and evapotranspiration (ET), with gross primary productivity (GPP) and ET jointly contributing over 50 % to its formation. In meadows, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> was regulated by Rain and canopy conductance (gc), with GPP and gc contributing 28.98 % and 19.57 %, respectively. As shown for the two ecosystems examined, the dune and meadow ecosystems exhibit pronounced differences in the critical soil moisture thresholds at which the system shifts between water and energy limitation. Given that drylands encompass a wide range of ecosystems—including grasslands, forests, and croplands. This highlights the necessity of establishing coordinated, multi-ecosystem observational networks across drylands to compare responses systematically and clarify vegetation–water interactions. This is essential for effective water resource management and ecosystem restoration in arid regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 110235"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377426001162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dryland ecosystems are highly sensitive to global change, with their carbon–water cycling strongly regulated by soil moisture (SM). The critical soil moisture content at which the ecosystem shifts from energy limitation to water limitation during drought can be regarded as a soil moisture threshold that characterizes this regulation. Accurately quantifying critical soil moisture thresholds (θt) remains a key scientific challenge in elucidating the mechanisms of carbon–water interactions. This study focuses on the Horqin Sandy Land, one of the four major sandy regions in northern China, using long-term eddy covariance and environmental data collected from dune and meadow ecosystems during the growing seasons (May–September) from 2013 to 2024. Three methods—evaporative fraction (EF), covariance (Cov), and correlation difference (corr)—were used to identify to θt, marking the transition from energy-limited to water-limited states during drought. Furthermore, interpretable machine learning (XGBoost–SHAP) and dominance analysis (DA) were employed to elucidate the driving mechanisms of θt. Results showed that meadow ecosystems had stronger carbon uptake capacity, water regulatory potential, and environmental stability than dune ecosystems. The three methods yielded highly consistent θt for both dune (θtEF: 0.0676, θtCov: 0.0564, θtcorr: 0.0544 m³/m³) and meadow (θtEF: 0.4335, θtCov: 0.4178, θtcorr: 0.3934 m³/m³) ecosystems, with standard deviations of 0.005 and 0.023 m³ /m³ , respectively. In dunes, θt was primarily driven by rainfall (Rain) and evapotranspiration (ET), with gross primary productivity (GPP) and ET jointly contributing over 50 % to its formation. In meadows, θt was regulated by Rain and canopy conductance (gc), with GPP and gc contributing 28.98 % and 19.57 %, respectively. As shown for the two ecosystems examined, the dune and meadow ecosystems exhibit pronounced differences in the critical soil moisture thresholds at which the system shifts between water and energy limitation. Given that drylands encompass a wide range of ecosystems—including grasslands, forests, and croplands. This highlights the necessity of establishing coordinated, multi-ecosystem observational networks across drylands to compare responses systematically and clarify vegetation–water interactions. This is essential for effective water resource management and ecosystem restoration in arid regions.
半干旱沙地-草甸生态系统土壤临界水分阈值识别及水能调节机制
旱地生态系统对全球变化高度敏感,其碳水循环受土壤湿度的强烈调节。在干旱期间,生态系统从能量限制向水分限制转变的临界土壤水分含量可以被视为表征这一调节的土壤水分阈值。准确量化土壤临界水分阈值(θt)仍然是阐明碳水相互作用机制的关键科学挑战。以中国北方四大沙区之一的科尔沁沙地为研究对象,利用2013 - 2024年生长季(5 - 9月)沙丘和草甸生态系统的长期涡动相关方差和环境数据进行研究。利用蒸发分数(EF)、协方差(Cov)和相关差(corr)三种方法识别θt,标志着干旱期间从能量限制状态向水限制状态的转变。此外,采用可解释机器学习(XGBoost-SHAP)和优势度分析(DA)来阐明θt的驱动机制。结果表明,草甸生态系统比沙丘生态系统具有更强的碳吸收能力、水调节潜力和环境稳定性。三种方法对沙丘(θtEF: 0.0676, θtCov: 0.0564, θtcorr: 0.0544 m³/m³)和草甸(θtEF: 0.4335, θtCov: 0.4178, θtcorr: 0.3934 m³/m³)生态系统的θt结果高度一致,标准差分别为0.005和0.023 m³/m³。沙丘θt主要由降雨(Rain)和蒸散发(ET)驱动,总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散发对其形成的共同贡献率超过50%。草甸θt受雨导(GPP)和冠层导(gc)的调节,其中GPP和gc分别贡献28.98%和19.57%。正如所研究的两个生态系统所示,沙丘和草甸生态系统在临界土壤湿度阈值上表现出明显的差异,在这个阈值上,系统在水和能量限制之间转换。鉴于旱地包含了广泛的生态系统,包括草原、森林和农田。这突出了在旱地建立协调的多生态系统观测网络的必要性,以便系统地比较响应并澄清植被-水的相互作用。这对干旱区有效的水资源管理和生态系统恢复至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书