An integrated spatiotemporal techno-economic assessment of offshore renewable energy complementarity: A case study in China's maritime zones

IF 12.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Applied Energy Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127513
Wenjie Du , Guotian Cai , Jixiang Zhang , Yaodong Li , Zhou Zhou , Xiaoyu Chen , Shuai Nie
{"title":"An integrated spatiotemporal techno-economic assessment of offshore renewable energy complementarity: A case study in China's maritime zones","authors":"Wenjie Du ,&nbsp;Guotian Cai ,&nbsp;Jixiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yaodong Li ,&nbsp;Zhou Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Chen ,&nbsp;Shuai Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore wind/solar/wave complementarity can unlock large scale renewable potential, yet spatial potential, temporal stability and techno-economic performance are rarely evaluated together. This paper develops a grid-level spatiotemporal techno-economic framework combining spatial suitability screening, hourly simulations, multi-indicator stability optimization and lifecycle cost evaluation. Under future floating deployment, wind-wave and wind-solar hybrids use about 69% and 31% of wind-suitable waters but deliver 98% and 73% of wind-only electricity, respectively, markedly increasing generation per unit area. Stability-optimized wind-solar reduces offshore wind variability(<em>CV</em>/<em>FR</em>) and intermittency(<em>ZS</em>), whereas wind-wave delivers even stronger <em>FR</em> and <em>ZS</em> reductions but slightly increases <em>CV</em>, with smaller generation losses (12% versus 35% for wind-solar). Techno-economic results show that wind-solar hybrids achieve the lowest LCOE, falling to 43 €/MWh (aggressive case) by 2050, while wind-wave remains about two to three times higher. Relative to wind plus storage reference, wind-solar complementarity reduces lifecycle cost by around 83% across suitable maritime zones, whereas cost reductions for wind-wave occur mainly in southern offshore regions, indicating that temporal complementarity can economically substitute most of the storage required for output smoothing. Technology progress reduces LCOE by only 0.7% for wind-solar but by 40% for wind-wave, lowering the aggressive wind-wave median to about 56 €/MWh and allowing wind-wave to outperform wind-solar in parts of sea. Overall, a cost-effective nearshore belt is dominated by wind-solar hybrids, while wind-wave becomes increasingly attractive in deeper southern offshore waters as technology advances. These findings support wind-based complementary development pathways, clarify spatiotemporal trade-offs and monsoon-driven complementarity mechanisms in China's offshore regions, and offer insights that are relevant to region-specific coastal energy transition strategies, with a framework transferable to other marine regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127513"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926001650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offshore wind/solar/wave complementarity can unlock large scale renewable potential, yet spatial potential, temporal stability and techno-economic performance are rarely evaluated together. This paper develops a grid-level spatiotemporal techno-economic framework combining spatial suitability screening, hourly simulations, multi-indicator stability optimization and lifecycle cost evaluation. Under future floating deployment, wind-wave and wind-solar hybrids use about 69% and 31% of wind-suitable waters but deliver 98% and 73% of wind-only electricity, respectively, markedly increasing generation per unit area. Stability-optimized wind-solar reduces offshore wind variability(CV/FR) and intermittency(ZS), whereas wind-wave delivers even stronger FR and ZS reductions but slightly increases CV, with smaller generation losses (12% versus 35% for wind-solar). Techno-economic results show that wind-solar hybrids achieve the lowest LCOE, falling to 43 €/MWh (aggressive case) by 2050, while wind-wave remains about two to three times higher. Relative to wind plus storage reference, wind-solar complementarity reduces lifecycle cost by around 83% across suitable maritime zones, whereas cost reductions for wind-wave occur mainly in southern offshore regions, indicating that temporal complementarity can economically substitute most of the storage required for output smoothing. Technology progress reduces LCOE by only 0.7% for wind-solar but by 40% for wind-wave, lowering the aggressive wind-wave median to about 56 €/MWh and allowing wind-wave to outperform wind-solar in parts of sea. Overall, a cost-effective nearshore belt is dominated by wind-solar hybrids, while wind-wave becomes increasingly attractive in deeper southern offshore waters as technology advances. These findings support wind-based complementary development pathways, clarify spatiotemporal trade-offs and monsoon-driven complementarity mechanisms in China's offshore regions, and offer insights that are relevant to region-specific coastal energy transition strategies, with a framework transferable to other marine regions.
海上可再生能源互补性的时空技术经济综合评价——以中国海域为例
海上风能/太阳能/波浪的互补性可以释放大规模的可再生能源潜力,但空间潜力、时间稳定性和技术经济性能很少被同时评估。结合空间适宜性筛选、逐时模拟、多指标稳定性优化和生命周期成本评估,构建了网格级时空技术经济框架。在未来的浮动部署下,风浪和风能-太阳能混合动力将分别使用69%和31%的适合风力的水域,但分别提供98%和73%的纯风力电力,显著提高单位面积发电量。稳定性优化的风能-太阳能减少了海上风的可变性(CV/FR)和间歇性(ZS),而风波带来更强的FR和ZS减少,但略有增加CV,发电量损失更小(12%,而风能-太阳能为35%)。技术经济结果表明,到2050年,风能-太阳能混合发电的LCOE将降至43欧元/兆瓦时(激进的情况),而风能发电的LCOE仍将是风能发电的两到三倍。相对于风能+储能参考,在合适的海域,风能-太阳能互补性可将生命周期成本降低约83%,而风浪的成本降低主要发生在南部近海地区,这表明时间互补性可以经济地替代输出平滑所需的大部分储能。技术进步使风能-太阳能的LCOE仅降低了0.7%,但使风浪的LCOE降低了40%,使风浪的中位数降至56欧元/兆瓦时左右,使风浪在部分海域的性能优于风能-太阳能。总的来说,低成本的近岸地带主要由风能-太阳能混合动力车主导,而随着技术的进步,在南部更深的近海水域,风浪变得越来越有吸引力。这些发现支持了基于风能的互补发展路径,阐明了中国近海地区的时空权衡和季风驱动的互补机制,并提供了与特定区域的沿海能源转型战略相关的见解,其框架可转移到其他海洋地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书