Wenjie Du , Guotian Cai , Jixiang Zhang , Yaodong Li , Zhou Zhou , Xiaoyu Chen , Shuai Nie
{"title":"An integrated spatiotemporal techno-economic assessment of offshore renewable energy complementarity: A case study in China's maritime zones","authors":"Wenjie Du , Guotian Cai , Jixiang Zhang , Yaodong Li , Zhou Zhou , Xiaoyu Chen , Shuai Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2026.127513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Offshore wind/solar/wave complementarity can unlock large scale renewable potential, yet spatial potential, temporal stability and techno-economic performance are rarely evaluated together. This paper develops a grid-level spatiotemporal techno-economic framework combining spatial suitability screening, hourly simulations, multi-indicator stability optimization and lifecycle cost evaluation. Under future floating deployment, wind-wave and wind-solar hybrids use about 69% and 31% of wind-suitable waters but deliver 98% and 73% of wind-only electricity, respectively, markedly increasing generation per unit area. Stability-optimized wind-solar reduces offshore wind variability(<em>CV</em>/<em>FR</em>) and intermittency(<em>ZS</em>), whereas wind-wave delivers even stronger <em>FR</em> and <em>ZS</em> reductions but slightly increases <em>CV</em>, with smaller generation losses (12% versus 35% for wind-solar). Techno-economic results show that wind-solar hybrids achieve the lowest LCOE, falling to 43 €/MWh (aggressive case) by 2050, while wind-wave remains about two to three times higher. Relative to wind plus storage reference, wind-solar complementarity reduces lifecycle cost by around 83% across suitable maritime zones, whereas cost reductions for wind-wave occur mainly in southern offshore regions, indicating that temporal complementarity can economically substitute most of the storage required for output smoothing. Technology progress reduces LCOE by only 0.7% for wind-solar but by 40% for wind-wave, lowering the aggressive wind-wave median to about 56 €/MWh and allowing wind-wave to outperform wind-solar in parts of sea. Overall, a cost-effective nearshore belt is dominated by wind-solar hybrids, while wind-wave becomes increasingly attractive in deeper southern offshore waters as technology advances. These findings support wind-based complementary development pathways, clarify spatiotemporal trade-offs and monsoon-driven complementarity mechanisms in China's offshore regions, and offer insights that are relevant to region-specific coastal energy transition strategies, with a framework transferable to other marine regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"410 ","pages":"Article 127513"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261926001650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Offshore wind/solar/wave complementarity can unlock large scale renewable potential, yet spatial potential, temporal stability and techno-economic performance are rarely evaluated together. This paper develops a grid-level spatiotemporal techno-economic framework combining spatial suitability screening, hourly simulations, multi-indicator stability optimization and lifecycle cost evaluation. Under future floating deployment, wind-wave and wind-solar hybrids use about 69% and 31% of wind-suitable waters but deliver 98% and 73% of wind-only electricity, respectively, markedly increasing generation per unit area. Stability-optimized wind-solar reduces offshore wind variability(CV/FR) and intermittency(ZS), whereas wind-wave delivers even stronger FR and ZS reductions but slightly increases CV, with smaller generation losses (12% versus 35% for wind-solar). Techno-economic results show that wind-solar hybrids achieve the lowest LCOE, falling to 43 €/MWh (aggressive case) by 2050, while wind-wave remains about two to three times higher. Relative to wind plus storage reference, wind-solar complementarity reduces lifecycle cost by around 83% across suitable maritime zones, whereas cost reductions for wind-wave occur mainly in southern offshore regions, indicating that temporal complementarity can economically substitute most of the storage required for output smoothing. Technology progress reduces LCOE by only 0.7% for wind-solar but by 40% for wind-wave, lowering the aggressive wind-wave median to about 56 €/MWh and allowing wind-wave to outperform wind-solar in parts of sea. Overall, a cost-effective nearshore belt is dominated by wind-solar hybrids, while wind-wave becomes increasingly attractive in deeper southern offshore waters as technology advances. These findings support wind-based complementary development pathways, clarify spatiotemporal trade-offs and monsoon-driven complementarity mechanisms in China's offshore regions, and offer insights that are relevant to region-specific coastal energy transition strategies, with a framework transferable to other marine regions.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.