Integrating technology acceptance, self-determination, and self-regulation: A structural model of generative AI-supported learning and competence

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2026.108933
Shu Ching Yang
{"title":"Integrating technology acceptance, self-determination, and self-regulation: A structural model of generative AI-supported learning and competence","authors":"Shu Ching Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2026.108933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes an integrated framework that synthesizes Technology Acceptance, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) to explain how learners engage with and learn from AI tools. SRL, which involves proactive planning, monitoring, evaluation, and the regulation of cognition and motivation, is particularly crucial in AI contexts, where learners must manage their learning processes and regulate interactions with intelligent systems that influence cognitive load and task structure. Students using AI need to evaluate AI-generated responses, revise prompts, compare alternative outputs, and integrate AI suggestions with their own reasoning. These tasks represent a sophisticated form of SRL—AI-augmented regulation—where learners coordinate internal metacognition with external AI scaffolding. This study distinguishes between SRL as a macro-level regulatory capacity and Metacognitive Strategy Use (MSU) as a micro-level metacognitive enactment. SRL encompasses broad processes, such as goal setting, planning, and monitoring, while MSU refers to specific, real-time strategies during task execution, such as checking accuracy and revising prompts. By framing SRL and MSU in this way, the study clarifies how broader regulatory capacities enable specific metacognitive actions, facilitating deep learning and task engagement in AI-mediated contexts. This framework offers a developmental account of AI-supported learning that extends beyond simple acceptance to explain the processes by which learners sustain, regulate, and deepen their interaction with AI tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 108933"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563226000300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes an integrated framework that synthesizes Technology Acceptance, Self-Determination Theory (SDT), and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) to explain how learners engage with and learn from AI tools. SRL, which involves proactive planning, monitoring, evaluation, and the regulation of cognition and motivation, is particularly crucial in AI contexts, where learners must manage their learning processes and regulate interactions with intelligent systems that influence cognitive load and task structure. Students using AI need to evaluate AI-generated responses, revise prompts, compare alternative outputs, and integrate AI suggestions with their own reasoning. These tasks represent a sophisticated form of SRL—AI-augmented regulation—where learners coordinate internal metacognition with external AI scaffolding. This study distinguishes between SRL as a macro-level regulatory capacity and Metacognitive Strategy Use (MSU) as a micro-level metacognitive enactment. SRL encompasses broad processes, such as goal setting, planning, and monitoring, while MSU refers to specific, real-time strategies during task execution, such as checking accuracy and revising prompts. By framing SRL and MSU in this way, the study clarifies how broader regulatory capacities enable specific metacognitive actions, facilitating deep learning and task engagement in AI-mediated contexts. This framework offers a developmental account of AI-supported learning that extends beyond simple acceptance to explain the processes by which learners sustain, regulate, and deepen their interaction with AI tools.
整合技术接受、自决和自我调节:生成式人工智能支持的学习和能力的结构模型
本研究提出了一个综合技术接受、自决理论(SDT)和自我调节学习(SRL)的综合框架,以解释学习者如何参与并从人工智能工具中学习。SRL包括对认知和动机的主动规划、监测、评估和调节,在人工智能环境中尤为重要,因为学习者必须管理他们的学习过程,并调节与影响认知负荷和任务结构的智能系统的交互。使用人工智能的学生需要评估人工智能生成的回答,修改提示,比较不同的输出,并将人工智能建议与自己的推理结合起来。这些任务代表了srl - AI增强规则的一种复杂形式——学习者将内部元认知与外部AI框架协调起来。本研究区分了SRL作为宏观层面的调节能力和MSU作为微观层面的元认知行为。SRL包含广泛的过程,如目标设置、计划和监视,而MSU指的是任务执行期间具体的实时策略,如检查准确性和修改提示。通过以这种方式构建SRL和MSU,该研究阐明了更广泛的调节能力如何实现特定的元认知行为,促进人工智能介导背景下的深度学习和任务参与。该框架提供了人工智能支持学习的发展描述,超越了简单的接受,解释了学习者维持、调节和深化与人工智能工具互动的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书