Catherine Sam Lerose , M. Nils Peterson , Lincoln R. Larson , William Casola , Lauren D. Pharr , Carol S. Price , Justin Beall , Richard von Furstenberg , Audrey Vaughn , Amelia Barber
{"title":"Assessing public attitudes towards sharks using the Implicit Association Test","authors":"Catherine Sam Lerose , M. Nils Peterson , Lincoln R. Larson , William Casola , Lauren D. Pharr , Carol S. Price , Justin Beall , Richard von Furstenberg , Audrey Vaughn , Amelia Barber","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2026.107076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fear and negative attitudes toward sharks make conservation of the species challenging. Despite the importance of attitudes in shaping public perceptions, little is known about whether they are innate or learned, and no research has explored implicit attitudes toward sharks. In this study, we used the implicit association test (IAT) to measure implicit attitudes towards sharks in a sample of 389 adults living in a coastal U.S. state (North Carolina) and assess demographic correlates of those implicit attitudes. The overall average IAT score was negative (M = −0.11, SD = 0.46), with 62 % of the respondents displaying negative IAT scores and 38 % displaying positive scores. Few demographic differences were observed, although the respondents with college degrees expressed more negative implicit attitudes toward sharks (β= −0.05, SE = 0.02). Future research is needed to determine if and how lifestyles associated with higher educational achievement contribute to negative implicit attitudes toward sharks, even when explicit attitudes are positive. Overall, the study results support the hypothesis of implicit attitudes creating aversion to sharks. Thus, efforts to reduce human persecution of sharks may benefit from acknowledging and addressing these implicit attitudes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107076"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X26000461","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fear and negative attitudes toward sharks make conservation of the species challenging. Despite the importance of attitudes in shaping public perceptions, little is known about whether they are innate or learned, and no research has explored implicit attitudes toward sharks. In this study, we used the implicit association test (IAT) to measure implicit attitudes towards sharks in a sample of 389 adults living in a coastal U.S. state (North Carolina) and assess demographic correlates of those implicit attitudes. The overall average IAT score was negative (M = −0.11, SD = 0.46), with 62 % of the respondents displaying negative IAT scores and 38 % displaying positive scores. Few demographic differences were observed, although the respondents with college degrees expressed more negative implicit attitudes toward sharks (β= −0.05, SE = 0.02). Future research is needed to determine if and how lifestyles associated with higher educational achievement contribute to negative implicit attitudes toward sharks, even when explicit attitudes are positive. Overall, the study results support the hypothesis of implicit attitudes creating aversion to sharks. Thus, efforts to reduce human persecution of sharks may benefit from acknowledging and addressing these implicit attitudes.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.