Inteligencia artificial en la educación basada en simulación clínica en América Latina: un estudio transversal de los conocimientos, prácticas y percepciones de los educadores

IF 0.7 Q2 Social Sciences
Educacion Medica Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1016/j.edumed.2026.101172
Diego Andrés Díaz-Guio , Valeria Aylin Infante-Villagrán , Camilo Ángel-Díaz , Diana Montes , Ana Sofía Díaz-Gómez , Andy Pantoja , Cyndi Meneses
{"title":"Inteligencia artificial en la educación basada en simulación clínica en América Latina: un estudio transversal de los conocimientos, prácticas y percepciones de los educadores","authors":"Diego Andrés Díaz-Guio ,&nbsp;Valeria Aylin Infante-Villagrán ,&nbsp;Camilo Ángel-Díaz ,&nbsp;Diana Montes ,&nbsp;Ana Sofía Díaz-Gómez ,&nbsp;Andy Pantoja ,&nbsp;Cyndi Meneses","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2026.101172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Given the scarcity of Latin American publications on Artificial Intelligence in Simulation-Based Education, this study describes the knowledge, usage practices, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes toward the use of Artificial Intelligence among simulation educators in Latin America regarding AI.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A quantitative, cross-sectional, and exploratory study (N = 242) was conducted with educators from 16 countries. A sociodemographic questionnaire, an AI knowledge test (α = 0.758), questions on AI practices, and instruments assessing technology acceptance (α = 0.822) and attitudes toward AI use (α = 0.808) were applied. Group comparisons were performed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance on the knowledge test was high (correct responses: 58.3%–87.2%), with chatbots being the most frequently used tools. Positive valence was observed for perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes. Statistically significant differences were identified in declarative knowledge and perceived usefulness according to gender and self-perceived level of proficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Simulation educators in Latin America show a generally positive perspective toward Artificial Intelligence. However, the gap between high interest and limited implementation highlights the need to strengthen Artificial Intelligence literacy and faculty development to accelerate the ethical and equitable adoption of these technologies in Simulation-Based Education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 101172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181326000240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Given the scarcity of Latin American publications on Artificial Intelligence in Simulation-Based Education, this study describes the knowledge, usage practices, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitudes toward the use of Artificial Intelligence among simulation educators in Latin America regarding AI.

Materials and methods

A quantitative, cross-sectional, and exploratory study (N = 242) was conducted with educators from 16 countries. A sociodemographic questionnaire, an AI knowledge test (α = 0.758), questions on AI practices, and instruments assessing technology acceptance (α = 0.822) and attitudes toward AI use (α = 0.808) were applied. Group comparisons were performed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

Performance on the knowledge test was high (correct responses: 58.3%–87.2%), with chatbots being the most frequently used tools. Positive valence was observed for perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes. Statistically significant differences were identified in declarative knowledge and perceived usefulness according to gender and self-perceived level of proficiency.

Conclusion

Simulation educators in Latin America show a generally positive perspective toward Artificial Intelligence. However, the gap between high interest and limited implementation highlights the need to strengthen Artificial Intelligence literacy and faculty development to accelerate the ethical and equitable adoption of these technologies in Simulation-Based Education.
拉丁美洲以临床模拟为基础的人工智能教育:教育者的知识、实践和认知的横断面研究
鉴于拉丁美洲关于基于模拟的教育中人工智能的出版物的稀缺性,本研究描述了拉丁美洲关于人工智能的模拟教育工作者对人工智能使用的知识、使用实践、感知有用性、感知易用性和态度。材料和方法对来自16个国家的教育工作者进行了定量、横断面和探索性研究(N = 242)。采用了社会人口调查问卷、人工智能知识测试(α = 0.758)、人工智能实践问题,以及评估技术接受度(α = 0.822)和对人工智能使用态度(α = 0.808)的工具。采用非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行组间比较。结果在知识测试中的表现较高(正确率58.3% ~ 87.2%),其中聊天机器人是最常用的工具。在感知有用性、易用性和态度方面观察到正效价。在陈述性知识和感知有用性方面,性别和自我感知熟练程度存在统计学显著差异。结论拉丁美洲的模拟教育工作者对人工智能普遍持积极态度。然而,高兴趣和有限实施之间的差距突出了加强人工智能素养和教师发展的必要性,以加速在基于模拟的教育中道德和公平地采用这些技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书