Comparative evaluation of four nanocarriers in shrimp larvae and transcriptomic dissection of mesoporous silica nanoparticle-induced stress

IF 9.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sheng Huang , Falin Zhou , Ziyang Cao , Dianchang Zhang , Qibin Yang , Song Jiang , Lishi Yang , Jianhua Huang , Erchao Li , Yundong Li
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of four nanocarriers in shrimp larvae and transcriptomic dissection of mesoporous silica nanoparticle-induced stress","authors":"Sheng Huang ,&nbsp;Falin Zhou ,&nbsp;Ziyang Cao ,&nbsp;Dianchang Zhang ,&nbsp;Qibin Yang ,&nbsp;Song Jiang ,&nbsp;Lishi Yang ,&nbsp;Jianhua Huang ,&nbsp;Erchao Li ,&nbsp;Yundong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2026.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To evaluate the biocompatibility of various nanomaterials in aquatic invertebrates and their biocompatibility profiles relevant to gene delivery applications, this study systematically compares the effects of four representative nanocarriers—mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN), chitosan derivatives (CTMT), PEI–PEG copolymers (TNP), and lipid nanoparticles (LNP)—across four developmental stages of <em>Penaeus monodon</em> (Nauplius, Zoea, Mysis, and Post-larva). Acute effects on larval survival and development, tissue injury, and molecular responses were comprehensively assessed through mortality rates, morphological abnormalities, and multichannel fluorescence staining. Among the tested materials, MSN induced the most pronounced cellular damage and lethality at all stages, whereas TNP and LNP caused lower mortality, fewer larval malformations, and weaker cellular stress responses, indicating superior biocompatibility. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that MSN exposure triggered extensive differential gene expression associated with energy metabolism, protease regulation, and immune response, displaying distinct stage-specific patterns. Core gene network analysis identified <em>RHOA, CASP1</em>, and <em>Spn88Ea</em> as key mediators potentially involved in MSN-induced apoptosis and stress responses. Collectively, the findings indicate that TNP and LNP exhibit higher biocompatibility and may represent safer candidates for future nucleic-acid delivery studies, whereas MSN, despite its structural advantages, requires stringent control of dosage and exposure duration prior to application. This study provides essential data and theoretical support for the selection and safety evaluation of nano-delivery systems in aquatic animals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277241662600029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the biocompatibility of various nanomaterials in aquatic invertebrates and their biocompatibility profiles relevant to gene delivery applications, this study systematically compares the effects of four representative nanocarriers—mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN), chitosan derivatives (CTMT), PEI–PEG copolymers (TNP), and lipid nanoparticles (LNP)—across four developmental stages of Penaeus monodon (Nauplius, Zoea, Mysis, and Post-larva). Acute effects on larval survival and development, tissue injury, and molecular responses were comprehensively assessed through mortality rates, morphological abnormalities, and multichannel fluorescence staining. Among the tested materials, MSN induced the most pronounced cellular damage and lethality at all stages, whereas TNP and LNP caused lower mortality, fewer larval malformations, and weaker cellular stress responses, indicating superior biocompatibility. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that MSN exposure triggered extensive differential gene expression associated with energy metabolism, protease regulation, and immune response, displaying distinct stage-specific patterns. Core gene network analysis identified RHOA, CASP1, and Spn88Ea as key mediators potentially involved in MSN-induced apoptosis and stress responses. Collectively, the findings indicate that TNP and LNP exhibit higher biocompatibility and may represent safer candidates for future nucleic-acid delivery studies, whereas MSN, despite its structural advantages, requires stringent control of dosage and exposure duration prior to application. This study provides essential data and theoretical support for the selection and safety evaluation of nano-delivery systems in aquatic animals.

Abstract Image

四种纳米载体在虾仔体内的比较评价及介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒诱导应激的转录组解剖
为了评估各种纳米材料在水生无脊椎动物中的生物相容性及其与基因传递应用相关的生物相容性特征,本研究系统地比较了四种具有代表性的纳米载体——介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒(MSN)、壳聚糖衍生物(CTMT)、PEI-PEG共聚物(TNP)和脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)在单对虾(Nauplius、Zoea、Mysis和幼虫后)四个发育阶段的影响。通过死亡率、形态学异常和多通道荧光染色综合评估对幼虫存活和发育、组织损伤和分子反应的急性影响。在所测试的材料中,MSN在所有阶段诱导的细胞损伤和致死性最为明显,而TNP和LNP的死亡率较低,幼虫畸形较少,细胞应激反应较弱,表明其具有较好的生物相容性。转录组学分析显示,MSN暴露引发了与能量代谢、蛋白酶调节和免疫反应相关的广泛差异基因表达,显示出不同的阶段特异性模式。核心基因网络分析发现,RHOA、CASP1和Spn88Ea是可能参与msn诱导的细胞凋亡和应激反应的关键介质。总的来说,研究结果表明TNP和LNP具有更高的生物相容性,可能是未来核酸递送研究中更安全的候选物,而MSN尽管具有结构优势,但在应用前需要严格控制剂量和暴露时间。本研究为水生动物纳米给药系统的选择和安全性评价提供了必要的数据和理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书