Altar to Attic to Analysis: Geochemical Authentication of a Rediscovered Victorian Thin Section of Stonehenge’s Altar stone

IF 1.6 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Anthony J.I. Clarke , Christopher L. Kirkland , Arthur de Oliveira Vicentini , Lisa Brown
{"title":"Altar to Attic to Analysis: Geochemical Authentication of a Rediscovered Victorian Thin Section of Stonehenge’s Altar stone","authors":"Anthony J.I. Clarke ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Kirkland ,&nbsp;Arthur de Oliveira Vicentini ,&nbsp;Lisa Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Authenticating purported fragments of the Altar Stone, the central six-tonne megalith at Stonehenge, underpins ongoing archaeological investigations and helps preserve valuable material by limiting the need for further destructive sampling. Here, using automated mineralogy and U–Pb zircon–apatite isotopes we examine Victorian thin-section S45 rediscovered in 2021, to evaluate its provenance. Pb-contamination from antique coverslip balsam resin complicates obtaining primary zircon U–Pb ratios. To address this issue, we subset time-resolved zircon isotopic ratio integrations from laser ablation signals and calculate internal grain-level regressions, maximising data recovery. This approach yields twelve zircon dates spanning 389–1850 Ma, while apatite yields components at <em>ca.</em> 1043 and 449 Ma. These ages are consistent with a provenance from northeast Scotland’s Upper Old Red Sandstone Orcadian Basin. Our findings support S45 as an Altar Stone fragment and demonstrate a framework for extracting reliable U–Pb ages from historic thin sections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 105619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X26000544","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authenticating purported fragments of the Altar Stone, the central six-tonne megalith at Stonehenge, underpins ongoing archaeological investigations and helps preserve valuable material by limiting the need for further destructive sampling. Here, using automated mineralogy and U–Pb zircon–apatite isotopes we examine Victorian thin-section S45 rediscovered in 2021, to evaluate its provenance. Pb-contamination from antique coverslip balsam resin complicates obtaining primary zircon U–Pb ratios. To address this issue, we subset time-resolved zircon isotopic ratio integrations from laser ablation signals and calculate internal grain-level regressions, maximising data recovery. This approach yields twelve zircon dates spanning 389–1850 Ma, while apatite yields components at ca. 1043 and 449 Ma. These ages are consistent with a provenance from northeast Scotland’s Upper Old Red Sandstone Orcadian Basin. Our findings support S45 as an Altar Stone fragment and demonstrate a framework for extracting reliable U–Pb ages from historic thin sections.
从祭坛到阁楼再到分析:重新发现的维多利亚时代巨石阵祭坛石薄片的地球化学鉴定
鉴定所谓的“祭坛石”(位于巨石阵中心的重达6吨的巨石)碎片的真实性,为正在进行的考古调查提供了基础,并通过限制进一步破坏性取样的需要,有助于保存有价值的材料。在这里,我们使用自动化矿物学和U-Pb锆石-磷灰石同位素检查了2021年重新发现的维多利亚薄片S45,以评估其来源。仿古凤仙花树脂的铅污染使原始锆石U-Pb比值的获得复杂化。为了解决这个问题,我们从激光烧蚀信号中提取时间分辨锆石同位素比值积分,并计算内部颗粒级回归,最大限度地提高数据恢复。这种方法得到了12个锆石日期跨度为389-1850 Ma,而磷灰石则得到了大约1043和449 Ma的成分。这些年龄与苏格兰东北部上老红砂岩奥克迪亚盆地的物源一致。我们的发现支持S45作为祭坛石碎片,并展示了从历史薄片中提取可靠U-Pb年龄的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书