Advances in Additive Manufacturing for Architectural Acoustics: Design, Materials, Validation, and Implementation Challenges in Building Construction

IF 5.2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Additive manufacturing letters Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100368
Taiwo Martins Esan, Williams Kehinde Kupolati, Chris Ackerman
{"title":"Advances in Additive Manufacturing for Architectural Acoustics: Design, Materials, Validation, and Implementation Challenges in Building Construction","authors":"Taiwo Martins Esan,&nbsp;Williams Kehinde Kupolati,&nbsp;Chris Ackerman","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly referred to as 3D printing, has emerged as a transformative technology in the construction sector, enabling unprecedented geometric freedom, automation, and material efficiency. While its adoption for structural applications has accelerated, its integration into building acoustics remains limited and fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 79 peer-reviewed studies to evaluate the current state of AM for architectural acoustic applications, with emphasis on materials, design strategies, validation methods, and implementation challenges. Four dominant constraint categories are identified: material limitations (≈38%), structural and design constraints (≈19%), modeling and prediction inaccuracies (≈16%), and acoustic performance limitations, particularly narrow operational bandwidths (≈27%). The review highlights the critical role of geometry-driven design, including acoustic metamaterials and micro-perforated panels, enabled by AM processes such as material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, and powder bed fusion. However, persistent challenges related to sustainability, process scalability, surface quality, and limited field-scale validation restrict broader adoption. Emerging solutions, including AI-assisted material formulation, generative acoustic design, and hybrid computational–experimental workflows, are identified as key enablers for progress. The findings provide actionable insights for engineers and designers seeking to deploy AM-based acoustic components in buildings and establish a roadmap for advancing scalable, sustainable, and high-performance architectural acoustics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369026000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly referred to as 3D printing, has emerged as a transformative technology in the construction sector, enabling unprecedented geometric freedom, automation, and material efficiency. While its adoption for structural applications has accelerated, its integration into building acoustics remains limited and fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 79 peer-reviewed studies to evaluate the current state of AM for architectural acoustic applications, with emphasis on materials, design strategies, validation methods, and implementation challenges. Four dominant constraint categories are identified: material limitations (≈38%), structural and design constraints (≈19%), modeling and prediction inaccuracies (≈16%), and acoustic performance limitations, particularly narrow operational bandwidths (≈27%). The review highlights the critical role of geometry-driven design, including acoustic metamaterials and micro-perforated panels, enabled by AM processes such as material extrusion, vat photopolymerization, and powder bed fusion. However, persistent challenges related to sustainability, process scalability, surface quality, and limited field-scale validation restrict broader adoption. Emerging solutions, including AI-assisted material formulation, generative acoustic design, and hybrid computational–experimental workflows, are identified as key enablers for progress. The findings provide actionable insights for engineers and designers seeking to deploy AM-based acoustic components in buildings and establish a roadmap for advancing scalable, sustainable, and high-performance architectural acoustics.
建筑声学增材制造的进展:建筑施工中的设计、材料、验证和实施挑战
增材制造(AM),通常被称为3D打印,已经成为建筑领域的一项变革性技术,实现了前所未有的几何自由度、自动化和材料效率。虽然它在结构应用中的应用已经加速,但它与建筑声学的整合仍然有限和分散。本系统综述综合了79项同行评议的研究结果,以评估AM在建筑声学应用中的现状,重点是材料、设计策略、验证方法和实施挑战。确定了四个主要的约束类别:材料限制(≈38%),结构和设计限制(≈19%),建模和预测不准确性(≈16%),以及声学性能限制,特别是窄操作带宽(≈27%)。该综述强调了几何驱动设计的关键作用,包括声学超材料和微穿孔板,这些都是通过增材制造工艺(如材料挤压、容器光聚合和粉末床融合)实现的。然而,与可持续性、工艺可扩展性、表面质量和有限的现场规模验证相关的持续挑战限制了该技术的广泛应用。新兴的解决方案,包括人工智能辅助材料配方、生成声学设计和混合计算实验工作流程,被认为是取得进展的关键推动因素。研究结果为工程师和设计师在建筑中部署基于am的声学组件提供了可行的见解,并为推进可扩展、可持续和高性能的建筑声学建立了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Additive manufacturing letters
Additive manufacturing letters Materials Science (General), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书