{"title":"A Buckingham-Pi dimensionless analysis for melt pool stability and defect prediction in additive manufacturing","authors":"Mahdi Alishavandi, Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamci","doi":"10.1016/j.addlet.2026.100366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Melt pool instabilities limit the reliability of additive manufacturing. Here, we demonstrate that a minimal Buckingham-<span><math><mi>π</mi></math></span> framework, supplemented by a normalized enthalpy (NE) metric, consolidates process outcomes across heat source settings (power, speed, spot) and material properties. IN738LC was processed on an EOS M290; single-track and bulk responses, melt pool geometric features, part relative density (<span><math><msup><mrow><mi>ρ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup></math></span>), and areal roughness parameters <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>z</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, were quantified and subsequently mapped onto compact NE-dimensionless number spaces after the normalized-enthalpy metric had been calibrated using an effective absorptivity inferred from the measured melt pool depth. The recoil number cleanly delineates modes: <span><math><mrow><mi>Recoil</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>≲</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>2</mn></mrow></math></span> (conduction<span><math><mo>→</mo></math></span>stable keyhole) maintains <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>ρ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>∗</mo></mrow></msup><mspace></mspace><mo>≳</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>99</mn><mtext>%</mtext></mrow></math></span> with low <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, whereas <span><math><mrow><mi>Recoil</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>≳</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>4</mn></mrow></math></span>–5 marks an unstable keyhole with spatter and porosity. Within this map, favorable transport balances are <span><math><mrow><mi>Re</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>≲</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>100</mn></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mi>We</mi><mspace></mspace><mo><</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span>, small <span><math><mi>Ca</mi></math></span> and not-too-small <span><math><mi>Oh</mi></math></span>, and <span><math><mrow><mi>Fo</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>></mo><mspace></mspace><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span>; external convection remains negligible (<span><math><mrow><mi>Nu</mi><mspace></mspace><mo>≪</mo><mspace></mspace><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span>). Rather than VED, we advocate working directly in <span><math><mi>Π</mi></math></span>-space <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>NE</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Recoil</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Re</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>We</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Ca</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Oh</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Fo</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>Nu</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>—to define, compare, and transfer qualifiable process windows across machines and alloys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72068,"journal":{"name":"Additive manufacturing letters","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Additive manufacturing letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772369026000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Melt pool instabilities limit the reliability of additive manufacturing. Here, we demonstrate that a minimal Buckingham- framework, supplemented by a normalized enthalpy (NE) metric, consolidates process outcomes across heat source settings (power, speed, spot) and material properties. IN738LC was processed on an EOS M290; single-track and bulk responses, melt pool geometric features, part relative density (), and areal roughness parameters and , were quantified and subsequently mapped onto compact NE-dimensionless number spaces after the normalized-enthalpy metric had been calibrated using an effective absorptivity inferred from the measured melt pool depth. The recoil number cleanly delineates modes: (conductionstable keyhole) maintains with low , whereas –5 marks an unstable keyhole with spatter and porosity. Within this map, favorable transport balances are , , small and not-too-small , and ; external convection remains negligible (). Rather than VED, we advocate working directly in -space —to define, compare, and transfer qualifiable process windows across machines and alloys.