A generalization of von Neumann’s reduction from the assignment problem to zero-sum games

IF 1.1 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Games and Economic Behavior Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.geb.2026.01.009
Ilan Adler , Martin Bullinger , Vijay V. Vazirani
{"title":"A generalization of von Neumann’s reduction from the assignment problem to zero-sum games","authors":"Ilan Adler ,&nbsp;Martin Bullinger ,&nbsp;Vijay V. Vazirani","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The equivalence between von Neumann’s Minimax Theorem for zero-sum games and the LP Duality Theorem connects cornerstone problems of the two fields of game theory and optimization, respectively, and has been the subject of intense scrutiny for seven decades. Yet, as observed in this paper, the proof of the difficult direction of this equivalence is unsatisfactory: It does not assign distinct roles to the two players of the game, as is natural from the definition of a zero-sum game.</div><div>In retrospect, a partial resolution to this predicament was provided in another brilliant paper of von Neumann (1953), which reduced the assignment problem to zero-sum games. However, the underlying LP is highly specialized — all entries of its objective function vector are strictly positive, the constraint vector is all ones, and the constraint matrix is 0/1.</div><div>We generalize von Neumann’s result along two directions, each allowing negative entries in certain parts of the LP. Our reductions make explicit the roles of the two players of the reduced game, namely their maximin strategies are to play optimal solutions to the primal and dual LPs. Furthermore, unlike previous reductions, the value of the reduced game reveals the value of the given LP. Our generalizations encompass several basic economic scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48291,"journal":{"name":"Games and Economic Behavior","volume":"157 ","pages":"Pages 226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Games and Economic Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899825626000199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The equivalence between von Neumann’s Minimax Theorem for zero-sum games and the LP Duality Theorem connects cornerstone problems of the two fields of game theory and optimization, respectively, and has been the subject of intense scrutiny for seven decades. Yet, as observed in this paper, the proof of the difficult direction of this equivalence is unsatisfactory: It does not assign distinct roles to the two players of the game, as is natural from the definition of a zero-sum game.
In retrospect, a partial resolution to this predicament was provided in another brilliant paper of von Neumann (1953), which reduced the assignment problem to zero-sum games. However, the underlying LP is highly specialized — all entries of its objective function vector are strictly positive, the constraint vector is all ones, and the constraint matrix is 0/1.
We generalize von Neumann’s result along two directions, each allowing negative entries in certain parts of the LP. Our reductions make explicit the roles of the two players of the reduced game, namely their maximin strategies are to play optimal solutions to the primal and dual LPs. Furthermore, unlike previous reductions, the value of the reduced game reveals the value of the given LP. Our generalizations encompass several basic economic scenarios.
将冯·诺伊曼的简化方法从分配问题推广到零和博弈
冯·诺伊曼的零和博弈极小极大定理与LP对偶定理之间的等价性,分别连接了博弈论和优化这两个领域的基石问题,70年来一直是人们密切关注的主题。然而,正如本文所观察到的那样,这种等价的困难方向的证明并不令人满意:它没有为游戏的两个参与者分配不同的角色,这是零和游戏定义的自然结果。回想起来,冯·诺伊曼(1953)的另一篇杰出论文为这一困境提供了部分解决方案,该论文将分配问题简化为零和博弈。然而,底层LP是高度专门化的——它的目标函数向量的所有项都是严格正的,约束向量都是1,约束矩阵是0/1。我们沿着两个方向推广冯·诺伊曼的结果,每个方向都允许在LP的某些部分出现负值。我们的约简明确了两个博弈参与者的角色,即他们的最大化策略是对原始lp和双lp进行最优解。此外,与之前的缩减不同,缩减后的游戏价值揭示了给定LP的价值。我们的概括包括几种基本的经济情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: Games and Economic Behavior facilitates cross-fertilization between theories and applications of game theoretic reasoning. It consistently attracts the best quality and most creative papers in interdisciplinary studies within the social, biological, and mathematical sciences. Most readers recognize it as the leading journal in game theory. Research Areas Include: • Game theory • Economics • Political science • Biology • Computer science • Mathematics • Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书