{"title":"Assessing stage-dependent impacts of environmental factors on public-perceived flood risk: Insights from a GeoXAI framework","authors":"Bo Li , Zhiqi Zhang , Xuefei Wang , Shaobin Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flooding is among the most destructive natural hazards, posing a major threat to sustainable development. Accurate assessment of public-perceived flood risk (PPFR) is essential for improving flood impact evaluation and informing management strategies. Taking the “7.20 Extreme Rainfall” event in Zhengzhou in 2021 as a case study, this study quantifies PPFR and its evolution across the pre-flood, during-flood, and post-flood stages using social media data. By incorporating a Geospatial Explainable Artificial Intelligence (GeoXAI) framework, this study assesses the nonlinear effects and spatial heterogeneity of natural, built, and socioeconomic environmental factors on PPFR. The results show that: (a) Precipitation, road density, building density, population density, and night light index are the key determinants of PPFR; (b) These five key factors exhibit highly similar threshold effects across the three stages. However, the magnitudes of their positive and negative effects show significant stage-specific variations, peaking in the during-flood stage and remaining weakest in the pre-flood stage; (c) High-value positive areas for natural and built environmental factors exhibit a relatively stable spatial pattern, whereas those of socioeconomic environmental factors shift significantly across stages. Based on these findings, a stage-specific and dynamically adjustable prioritization mechanism is recommended to enhance the precision and efficiency of urban flood management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 108402"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925526000764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Flooding is among the most destructive natural hazards, posing a major threat to sustainable development. Accurate assessment of public-perceived flood risk (PPFR) is essential for improving flood impact evaluation and informing management strategies. Taking the “7.20 Extreme Rainfall” event in Zhengzhou in 2021 as a case study, this study quantifies PPFR and its evolution across the pre-flood, during-flood, and post-flood stages using social media data. By incorporating a Geospatial Explainable Artificial Intelligence (GeoXAI) framework, this study assesses the nonlinear effects and spatial heterogeneity of natural, built, and socioeconomic environmental factors on PPFR. The results show that: (a) Precipitation, road density, building density, population density, and night light index are the key determinants of PPFR; (b) These five key factors exhibit highly similar threshold effects across the three stages. However, the magnitudes of their positive and negative effects show significant stage-specific variations, peaking in the during-flood stage and remaining weakest in the pre-flood stage; (c) High-value positive areas for natural and built environmental factors exhibit a relatively stable spatial pattern, whereas those of socioeconomic environmental factors shift significantly across stages. Based on these findings, a stage-specific and dynamically adjustable prioritization mechanism is recommended to enhance the precision and efficiency of urban flood management.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.