Integrating artificial intelligence and data envelopment analysis for sustainable efficiency assessment in higher education

IF 23.4 Q1 Social Sciences
William Villegas-Ch , Rommel Gutierrez , Angel Jaramillo-Alcazar , Alexandra Maldonado-Navarro
{"title":"Integrating artificial intelligence and data envelopment analysis for sustainable efficiency assessment in higher education","authors":"William Villegas-Ch ,&nbsp;Rommel Gutierrez ,&nbsp;Angel Jaramillo-Alcazar ,&nbsp;Alexandra Maldonado-Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid digitalization of higher education has exposed inconsistencies between increased investments in technological infrastructure, teaching resources, and energy consumption, and the expected improvements in academic performance. This gap highlights the need for predictive and explainable approaches that can evaluate course-level efficiency while incorporating sustainability principles. In this study, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) under the output-oriented BCC formulation was applied to fifteen university courses to estimate their relative efficiency based on multiple inputs, including teaching staff, technological investment, digital resource usage, and energy consumption, and outputs such as passing, retention, completion, satisfaction, and learning outcomes. Only three courses achieved full efficiency (<span><math><mi>h</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1.0</mn></math></span>), whereas the remaining ones showed efficiency gaps ranging from 5.4% to 20.2% relative to the frontier. Energy consumption and learning outcomes emerged as the most influential determinants of efficiency. Artificial intelligence models were then trained under DEA supervision to predict efficiency scores with high fidelity (<span><math><msup><mi>R</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo>&gt;</mo><mn>0.90</mn></math></span> for Random Forest and Gradient Boosting), replicating DEA behavior and enabling prospective analysis. Finally, indicators aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4 and 12) demonstrated that equitable digital access management reduces dropout rates. At the same time, optimized energy use enhances sustainability metrics by up to twelve points, reinforcing the relevance of AI-driven learning analytics for efficient and sustainable educational management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100557"},"PeriodicalIF":23.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X26000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of higher education has exposed inconsistencies between increased investments in technological infrastructure, teaching resources, and energy consumption, and the expected improvements in academic performance. This gap highlights the need for predictive and explainable approaches that can evaluate course-level efficiency while incorporating sustainability principles. In this study, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) under the output-oriented BCC formulation was applied to fifteen university courses to estimate their relative efficiency based on multiple inputs, including teaching staff, technological investment, digital resource usage, and energy consumption, and outputs such as passing, retention, completion, satisfaction, and learning outcomes. Only three courses achieved full efficiency (h=1.0), whereas the remaining ones showed efficiency gaps ranging from 5.4% to 20.2% relative to the frontier. Energy consumption and learning outcomes emerged as the most influential determinants of efficiency. Artificial intelligence models were then trained under DEA supervision to predict efficiency scores with high fidelity (R2>0.90 for Random Forest and Gradient Boosting), replicating DEA behavior and enabling prospective analysis. Finally, indicators aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4 and 12) demonstrated that equitable digital access management reduces dropout rates. At the same time, optimized energy use enhances sustainability metrics by up to twelve points, reinforcing the relevance of AI-driven learning analytics for efficient and sustainable educational management.
结合人工智能和数据包络分析的高等教育可持续效率评估
高等教育的快速数字化暴露了在技术基础设施、教学资源和能源消耗方面增加投资与学业成绩预期改善之间的不一致。这一差距突出表明,需要采用可预测和可解释的方法来评估课程水平的效率,同时纳入可持续性原则。本研究采用产出导向的BCC公式下的数据包络分析(DEA),对15门大学课程进行了基于教学人员、技术投入、数字资源使用和能源消耗等多投入,以及通过、保留、完成、满意度和学习成果等产出的相对效率评估。只有三个课程达到了完全效率(h=1.0),而其余课程相对于前沿的效率差距在5.4%到20.2%之间。能源消耗和学习成果成为影响效率的最重要决定因素。然后在DEA监督下训练人工智能模型,以高保真度预测效率分数(随机森林和梯度增强的R2>;0.90),复制DEA行为并进行前瞻性分析。最后,与可持续发展目标(可持续发展目标4和12)相一致的指标表明,公平的数字访问管理可以降低辍学率。与此同时,优化的能源使用将可持续性指标提高了12个点,加强了人工智能驱动的学习分析与高效和可持续教育管理的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书